Cargando…
An association analysis of sow parity, live-weight and back-fat depth as indicators of sow productivity
Understanding how critical sow live-weight and back-fat depth during gestation are in ensuring optimum sow productivity is important. The objective of this study was to quantify the association between sow parity, live-weight and back-fat depth during gestation with subsequent sow reproductive perfo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6378545/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30017016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118001799 |
_version_ | 1783395942430408704 |
---|---|
author | Lavery, A. Lawlor, P. G. Magowan, E. Miller, H. M. O’Driscoll, K. Berry, D. P. |
author_facet | Lavery, A. Lawlor, P. G. Magowan, E. Miller, H. M. O’Driscoll, K. Berry, D. P. |
author_sort | Lavery, A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Understanding how critical sow live-weight and back-fat depth during gestation are in ensuring optimum sow productivity is important. The objective of this study was to quantify the association between sow parity, live-weight and back-fat depth during gestation with subsequent sow reproductive performance. Records of 1058 sows and 13 827 piglets from 10 trials on two research farms between the years 2005 and 2015 were analysed. Sows ranged from parity 1 to 6 with the number of sows per parity distributed as follows: 232, 277, 180, 131, 132 and 106, respectively. Variables that were analysed included total born (TB), born alive (BA), piglet birth weight (BtWT), pre-weaning mortality (PWM), piglet wean weight (WnWT), number of piglets weaned (Wn), wean to service interval (WSI), piglets born alive in subsequent farrowing and sow lactation feed intake. Calculated variables included the within-litter CV in birth weight (LtV), pre-weaning growth rate per litter (PWG), total litter gain (TLG), lactation efficiency and litter size reared after cross-fostering. Data were analysed using linear mixed models accounting for covariance among records. Third and fourth parity sows had more (P<0.05) TB, BA and heavier BtWT compared with gilts and parity 6 sow contemporaries. Parities 2 and 3 sows weaned more (P<0.05) piglets than older sows. These piglets had heavier (P<0.05) birth weights than those from gilt litters. LtV and PWM were greater (P<0.01) in litters born to parity 5 sows than those born to younger sows. Sow live-weight and back-fat depth at service, days 25 and 50 of gestation were not associated with TB, BA, BtWT, LtV, PWG, WnWT or lactation efficiency (P>0.05). Heavier sow live-weight throughout gestation was associated with an increase in PWM (P<0.01) and reduced Wn and lactation feed intake (P<0.05). Deeper back-fat in late gestation was associated with fewer (P<0.05) BA but heavier (P<0.05) BtWT, whereas deeper back-fat depth throughout gestation was associated with reduced (P<0.01) lactation feed intake. Sow back-fat depth was not associated with LtV, PWG, TLG, WSI or piglets born alive in subsequent farrowing (P>0.05). In conclusion, this study showed that sow parity, live-weight and back-fat depth can be used as indicators of reproductive performance. In addition, this study also provides validation for future development of a benchmarking tool to monitor and improve the productivity of modern sow herd. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6378545 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63785452019-02-22 An association analysis of sow parity, live-weight and back-fat depth as indicators of sow productivity Lavery, A. Lawlor, P. G. Magowan, E. Miller, H. M. O’Driscoll, K. Berry, D. P. Animal Research Article Understanding how critical sow live-weight and back-fat depth during gestation are in ensuring optimum sow productivity is important. The objective of this study was to quantify the association between sow parity, live-weight and back-fat depth during gestation with subsequent sow reproductive performance. Records of 1058 sows and 13 827 piglets from 10 trials on two research farms between the years 2005 and 2015 were analysed. Sows ranged from parity 1 to 6 with the number of sows per parity distributed as follows: 232, 277, 180, 131, 132 and 106, respectively. Variables that were analysed included total born (TB), born alive (BA), piglet birth weight (BtWT), pre-weaning mortality (PWM), piglet wean weight (WnWT), number of piglets weaned (Wn), wean to service interval (WSI), piglets born alive in subsequent farrowing and sow lactation feed intake. Calculated variables included the within-litter CV in birth weight (LtV), pre-weaning growth rate per litter (PWG), total litter gain (TLG), lactation efficiency and litter size reared after cross-fostering. Data were analysed using linear mixed models accounting for covariance among records. Third and fourth parity sows had more (P<0.05) TB, BA and heavier BtWT compared with gilts and parity 6 sow contemporaries. Parities 2 and 3 sows weaned more (P<0.05) piglets than older sows. These piglets had heavier (P<0.05) birth weights than those from gilt litters. LtV and PWM were greater (P<0.01) in litters born to parity 5 sows than those born to younger sows. Sow live-weight and back-fat depth at service, days 25 and 50 of gestation were not associated with TB, BA, BtWT, LtV, PWG, WnWT or lactation efficiency (P>0.05). Heavier sow live-weight throughout gestation was associated with an increase in PWM (P<0.01) and reduced Wn and lactation feed intake (P<0.05). Deeper back-fat in late gestation was associated with fewer (P<0.05) BA but heavier (P<0.05) BtWT, whereas deeper back-fat depth throughout gestation was associated with reduced (P<0.01) lactation feed intake. Sow back-fat depth was not associated with LtV, PWG, TLG, WSI or piglets born alive in subsequent farrowing (P>0.05). In conclusion, this study showed that sow parity, live-weight and back-fat depth can be used as indicators of reproductive performance. In addition, this study also provides validation for future development of a benchmarking tool to monitor and improve the productivity of modern sow herd. Cambridge University Press 2018-07-18 2019-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6378545/ /pubmed/30017016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118001799 Text en © The Animal Consortium 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is included and the original work is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lavery, A. Lawlor, P. G. Magowan, E. Miller, H. M. O’Driscoll, K. Berry, D. P. An association analysis of sow parity, live-weight and back-fat depth as indicators of sow productivity |
title | An association analysis of sow parity, live-weight and back-fat depth as indicators of sow productivity |
title_full | An association analysis of sow parity, live-weight and back-fat depth as indicators of sow productivity |
title_fullStr | An association analysis of sow parity, live-weight and back-fat depth as indicators of sow productivity |
title_full_unstemmed | An association analysis of sow parity, live-weight and back-fat depth as indicators of sow productivity |
title_short | An association analysis of sow parity, live-weight and back-fat depth as indicators of sow productivity |
title_sort | association analysis of sow parity, live-weight and back-fat depth as indicators of sow productivity |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6378545/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30017016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118001799 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laverya anassociationanalysisofsowparityliveweightandbackfatdepthasindicatorsofsowproductivity AT lawlorpg anassociationanalysisofsowparityliveweightandbackfatdepthasindicatorsofsowproductivity AT magowane anassociationanalysisofsowparityliveweightandbackfatdepthasindicatorsofsowproductivity AT millerhm anassociationanalysisofsowparityliveweightandbackfatdepthasindicatorsofsowproductivity AT odriscollk anassociationanalysisofsowparityliveweightandbackfatdepthasindicatorsofsowproductivity AT berrydp anassociationanalysisofsowparityliveweightandbackfatdepthasindicatorsofsowproductivity AT laverya associationanalysisofsowparityliveweightandbackfatdepthasindicatorsofsowproductivity AT lawlorpg associationanalysisofsowparityliveweightandbackfatdepthasindicatorsofsowproductivity AT magowane associationanalysisofsowparityliveweightandbackfatdepthasindicatorsofsowproductivity AT millerhm associationanalysisofsowparityliveweightandbackfatdepthasindicatorsofsowproductivity AT odriscollk associationanalysisofsowparityliveweightandbackfatdepthasindicatorsofsowproductivity AT berrydp associationanalysisofsowparityliveweightandbackfatdepthasindicatorsofsowproductivity |