Cargando…

Effect of Noise Reduction Gain Errors on Simulated Cochlear Implant Speech Intelligibility

It has been suggested that the most important factor for obtaining high speech intelligibility in noise with cochlear implant (CI) recipients is to preserve the low-frequency amplitude modulations of speech across time and frequency by, for example, minimizing the amount of noise in the gaps between...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kressner, Abigail A., May, Tobias, Dau, Torsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6378641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30755108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216519825930
_version_ 1783395961397051392
author Kressner, Abigail A.
May, Tobias
Dau, Torsten
author_facet Kressner, Abigail A.
May, Tobias
Dau, Torsten
author_sort Kressner, Abigail A.
collection PubMed
description It has been suggested that the most important factor for obtaining high speech intelligibility in noise with cochlear implant (CI) recipients is to preserve the low-frequency amplitude modulations of speech across time and frequency by, for example, minimizing the amount of noise in the gaps between speech segments. In contrast, it has also been argued that the transient parts of the speech signal, such as speech onsets, provide the most important information for speech intelligibility. The present study investigated the relative impact of these two factors on the potential benefit of noise reduction for CI recipients by systematically introducing noise estimation errors within speech segments, speech gaps, and the transitions between them. The introduction of these noise estimation errors directly induces errors in the noise reduction gains within each of these regions. Speech intelligibility in both stationary and modulated noise was then measured using a CI simulation tested on normal-hearing listeners. The results suggest that minimizing noise in the speech gaps can improve intelligibility, at least in modulated noise. However, significantly larger improvements were obtained when both the noise in the gaps was minimized and the speech transients were preserved. These results imply that the ability to identify the boundaries between speech segments and speech gaps may be one of the most important factors for a noise reduction algorithm because knowing the boundaries makes it possible to minimize the noise in the gaps as well as enhance the low-frequency amplitude modulations of the speech.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6378641
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63786412019-02-22 Effect of Noise Reduction Gain Errors on Simulated Cochlear Implant Speech Intelligibility Kressner, Abigail A. May, Tobias Dau, Torsten Trends Hear Original Article It has been suggested that the most important factor for obtaining high speech intelligibility in noise with cochlear implant (CI) recipients is to preserve the low-frequency amplitude modulations of speech across time and frequency by, for example, minimizing the amount of noise in the gaps between speech segments. In contrast, it has also been argued that the transient parts of the speech signal, such as speech onsets, provide the most important information for speech intelligibility. The present study investigated the relative impact of these two factors on the potential benefit of noise reduction for CI recipients by systematically introducing noise estimation errors within speech segments, speech gaps, and the transitions between them. The introduction of these noise estimation errors directly induces errors in the noise reduction gains within each of these regions. Speech intelligibility in both stationary and modulated noise was then measured using a CI simulation tested on normal-hearing listeners. The results suggest that minimizing noise in the speech gaps can improve intelligibility, at least in modulated noise. However, significantly larger improvements were obtained when both the noise in the gaps was minimized and the speech transients were preserved. These results imply that the ability to identify the boundaries between speech segments and speech gaps may be one of the most important factors for a noise reduction algorithm because knowing the boundaries makes it possible to minimize the noise in the gaps as well as enhance the low-frequency amplitude modulations of the speech. SAGE Publications 2019-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6378641/ /pubmed/30755108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216519825930 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Kressner, Abigail A.
May, Tobias
Dau, Torsten
Effect of Noise Reduction Gain Errors on Simulated Cochlear Implant Speech Intelligibility
title Effect of Noise Reduction Gain Errors on Simulated Cochlear Implant Speech Intelligibility
title_full Effect of Noise Reduction Gain Errors on Simulated Cochlear Implant Speech Intelligibility
title_fullStr Effect of Noise Reduction Gain Errors on Simulated Cochlear Implant Speech Intelligibility
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Noise Reduction Gain Errors on Simulated Cochlear Implant Speech Intelligibility
title_short Effect of Noise Reduction Gain Errors on Simulated Cochlear Implant Speech Intelligibility
title_sort effect of noise reduction gain errors on simulated cochlear implant speech intelligibility
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6378641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30755108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216519825930
work_keys_str_mv AT kressnerabigaila effectofnoisereductiongainerrorsonsimulatedcochlearimplantspeechintelligibility
AT maytobias effectofnoisereductiongainerrorsonsimulatedcochlearimplantspeechintelligibility
AT dautorsten effectofnoisereductiongainerrorsonsimulatedcochlearimplantspeechintelligibility