Cargando…
Rates and Risk Factors for Revision Open and Arthroscopic Proximal Biceps Tenodesis
BACKGROUND: Biceps tenodesis may be performed for symptomatic tendinopathy or tearing of the long head of the biceps tendon. Biceps tenodesis is also commonly performed as an adjunctive procedure. However, the indications and prevalence of biceps tenodesis have expanded. PURPOSE: To establish the in...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6378646/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30800694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118825473 |
_version_ | 1783395962642759680 |
---|---|
author | Forsythe, Brian Agarwalla, Avinesh Puzzitiello, Richard N. Mascarenhas, Randy Werner, Brian C. |
author_facet | Forsythe, Brian Agarwalla, Avinesh Puzzitiello, Richard N. Mascarenhas, Randy Werner, Brian C. |
author_sort | Forsythe, Brian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Biceps tenodesis may be performed for symptomatic tendinopathy or tearing of the long head of the biceps tendon. Biceps tenodesis is also commonly performed as an adjunctive procedure. However, the indications and prevalence of biceps tenodesis have expanded. PURPOSE: To establish the incidence and risk factors for revision biceps tenodesis. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: The PearlDiver database of Humana patient data was queried for patients undergoing arthroscopic or open biceps tenodesis (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] 29828 and CPT 23430, respectively) from 2008 through the first quarter of 2017. Patients without a CPT laterality modifier were excluded from analysis. Revision biceps tenodesis was defined as patients who underwent subsequent ipsilateral open or arthroscopic biceps tenodesis. The financial impact of revision biceps tenodesis was also calculated. Multivariate binomial logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for revision biceps tenodesis, such as patient demographics as well as concomitant procedures and diagnoses. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were calculated, and all statistical comparisons with P < .05 were considered significant. RESULTS: There were 15,257 patients who underwent biceps tenodesis. Of these, 9274 patients (60.8%) underwent arthroscopic biceps tenodesis, while 5983 (39.2%) underwent open biceps tenodesis. A total of 171 patients (1.8%) and 111 patients (1.9%) required revision biceps tenodesis after arthroscopic and open biceps tenodesis, respectively (P = .5). Male sex (OR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.04-1.85]; P = .02) was the only independent risk factor for revision biceps tenodesis after the index open biceps tenodesis. After arthroscopic biceps tenodesis, age >45 years (OR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.39-0.89]; P = .01) and concomitant rotator cuff tear (OR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.47-0.71]; P < .001) were independent protective factors for revision biceps tenodesis. The total cost of revision biceps tenodesis after open and arthroscopic biceps tenodesis was US$3427.95 and US$2174.33 per patient, respectively. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in the revision rate between arthroscopic and open biceps tenodesis. Risk factors for revision surgery included male sex for open biceps tenodesis, while age >45 years and rotator cuff tears were protective factors for arthroscopic biceps tenodesis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6378646 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63786462019-02-22 Rates and Risk Factors for Revision Open and Arthroscopic Proximal Biceps Tenodesis Forsythe, Brian Agarwalla, Avinesh Puzzitiello, Richard N. Mascarenhas, Randy Werner, Brian C. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Biceps tenodesis may be performed for symptomatic tendinopathy or tearing of the long head of the biceps tendon. Biceps tenodesis is also commonly performed as an adjunctive procedure. However, the indications and prevalence of biceps tenodesis have expanded. PURPOSE: To establish the incidence and risk factors for revision biceps tenodesis. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: The PearlDiver database of Humana patient data was queried for patients undergoing arthroscopic or open biceps tenodesis (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] 29828 and CPT 23430, respectively) from 2008 through the first quarter of 2017. Patients without a CPT laterality modifier were excluded from analysis. Revision biceps tenodesis was defined as patients who underwent subsequent ipsilateral open or arthroscopic biceps tenodesis. The financial impact of revision biceps tenodesis was also calculated. Multivariate binomial logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for revision biceps tenodesis, such as patient demographics as well as concomitant procedures and diagnoses. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were calculated, and all statistical comparisons with P < .05 were considered significant. RESULTS: There were 15,257 patients who underwent biceps tenodesis. Of these, 9274 patients (60.8%) underwent arthroscopic biceps tenodesis, while 5983 (39.2%) underwent open biceps tenodesis. A total of 171 patients (1.8%) and 111 patients (1.9%) required revision biceps tenodesis after arthroscopic and open biceps tenodesis, respectively (P = .5). Male sex (OR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.04-1.85]; P = .02) was the only independent risk factor for revision biceps tenodesis after the index open biceps tenodesis. After arthroscopic biceps tenodesis, age >45 years (OR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.39-0.89]; P = .01) and concomitant rotator cuff tear (OR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.47-0.71]; P < .001) were independent protective factors for revision biceps tenodesis. The total cost of revision biceps tenodesis after open and arthroscopic biceps tenodesis was US$3427.95 and US$2174.33 per patient, respectively. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in the revision rate between arthroscopic and open biceps tenodesis. Risk factors for revision surgery included male sex for open biceps tenodesis, while age >45 years and rotator cuff tears were protective factors for arthroscopic biceps tenodesis. SAGE Publications 2019-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6378646/ /pubmed/30800694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118825473 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Article Forsythe, Brian Agarwalla, Avinesh Puzzitiello, Richard N. Mascarenhas, Randy Werner, Brian C. Rates and Risk Factors for Revision Open and Arthroscopic Proximal Biceps Tenodesis |
title | Rates and Risk Factors for Revision Open and Arthroscopic Proximal Biceps Tenodesis |
title_full | Rates and Risk Factors for Revision Open and Arthroscopic Proximal Biceps Tenodesis |
title_fullStr | Rates and Risk Factors for Revision Open and Arthroscopic Proximal Biceps Tenodesis |
title_full_unstemmed | Rates and Risk Factors for Revision Open and Arthroscopic Proximal Biceps Tenodesis |
title_short | Rates and Risk Factors for Revision Open and Arthroscopic Proximal Biceps Tenodesis |
title_sort | rates and risk factors for revision open and arthroscopic proximal biceps tenodesis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6378646/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30800694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118825473 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT forsythebrian ratesandriskfactorsforrevisionopenandarthroscopicproximalbicepstenodesis AT agarwallaavinesh ratesandriskfactorsforrevisionopenandarthroscopicproximalbicepstenodesis AT puzzitiellorichardn ratesandriskfactorsforrevisionopenandarthroscopicproximalbicepstenodesis AT mascarenhasrandy ratesandriskfactorsforrevisionopenandarthroscopicproximalbicepstenodesis AT wernerbrianc ratesandriskfactorsforrevisionopenandarthroscopicproximalbicepstenodesis |