Cargando…

Segregation of salience network predicts treatment response of depression to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

BACKGROUND: The present study tested the hypothesis that network segregation, a graph theoretic measure of functional organization of the brain, is correlated with treatment response in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) undergoing repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fan, Jie, Tso, Ivy F., Maixner, Daniel F., Abagis, Tessa, Hernandez-Garcia, Luis, Taylor, Stephan F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6378906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30776777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101719
_version_ 1783396013553221632
author Fan, Jie
Tso, Ivy F.
Maixner, Daniel F.
Abagis, Tessa
Hernandez-Garcia, Luis
Taylor, Stephan F.
author_facet Fan, Jie
Tso, Ivy F.
Maixner, Daniel F.
Abagis, Tessa
Hernandez-Garcia, Luis
Taylor, Stephan F.
author_sort Fan, Jie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The present study tested the hypothesis that network segregation, a graph theoretic measure of functional organization of the brain, is correlated with treatment response in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) undergoing repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). METHODS: Network segregation, calculated from resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging scans, was measured in 32 patients with MDD who entered a sham-controlled, double-blinded, randomized trial of rTMS to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and a cohort of 20 healthy controls (HCs). Half of the MDD patients received sham treatment in the blinded phase, followed by active rTMS in the open-label phase. The analyses focused on segregation of the following networks: default mode (DMN), salience (SN), fronto-parietal (FPN), cingulo-opercular (CON), and memory retrieval (MRN). RESULTS: There was no differential change in network segregation comparing sham to active treatment. However, in the combined group of patients who completed active rTMS treatment (in the blinded plus open-label phases), higher baseline segregation of SN significantly predicted more symptom improvement after rTMS. Compared to HCs at baseline, MDD patients showed decreased segregation in DMN, and trend-level decreases in SN and MRN. CONCLUSION: The results highlight the importance of network segregation in MDD, particularly in the SN, where more normal baseline segregation of SN may predict better treatment response to rTMS in depression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6378906
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63789062019-02-27 Segregation of salience network predicts treatment response of depression to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation Fan, Jie Tso, Ivy F. Maixner, Daniel F. Abagis, Tessa Hernandez-Garcia, Luis Taylor, Stephan F. Neuroimage Clin Regular Article BACKGROUND: The present study tested the hypothesis that network segregation, a graph theoretic measure of functional organization of the brain, is correlated with treatment response in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) undergoing repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). METHODS: Network segregation, calculated from resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging scans, was measured in 32 patients with MDD who entered a sham-controlled, double-blinded, randomized trial of rTMS to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and a cohort of 20 healthy controls (HCs). Half of the MDD patients received sham treatment in the blinded phase, followed by active rTMS in the open-label phase. The analyses focused on segregation of the following networks: default mode (DMN), salience (SN), fronto-parietal (FPN), cingulo-opercular (CON), and memory retrieval (MRN). RESULTS: There was no differential change in network segregation comparing sham to active treatment. However, in the combined group of patients who completed active rTMS treatment (in the blinded plus open-label phases), higher baseline segregation of SN significantly predicted more symptom improvement after rTMS. Compared to HCs at baseline, MDD patients showed decreased segregation in DMN, and trend-level decreases in SN and MRN. CONCLUSION: The results highlight the importance of network segregation in MDD, particularly in the SN, where more normal baseline segregation of SN may predict better treatment response to rTMS in depression. Elsevier 2019-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6378906/ /pubmed/30776777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101719 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Regular Article
Fan, Jie
Tso, Ivy F.
Maixner, Daniel F.
Abagis, Tessa
Hernandez-Garcia, Luis
Taylor, Stephan F.
Segregation of salience network predicts treatment response of depression to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
title Segregation of salience network predicts treatment response of depression to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
title_full Segregation of salience network predicts treatment response of depression to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
title_fullStr Segregation of salience network predicts treatment response of depression to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Segregation of salience network predicts treatment response of depression to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
title_short Segregation of salience network predicts treatment response of depression to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
title_sort segregation of salience network predicts treatment response of depression to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6378906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30776777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101719
work_keys_str_mv AT fanjie segregationofsaliencenetworkpredictstreatmentresponseofdepressiontorepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT tsoivyf segregationofsaliencenetworkpredictstreatmentresponseofdepressiontorepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT maixnerdanielf segregationofsaliencenetworkpredictstreatmentresponseofdepressiontorepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT abagistessa segregationofsaliencenetworkpredictstreatmentresponseofdepressiontorepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT hernandezgarcialuis segregationofsaliencenetworkpredictstreatmentresponseofdepressiontorepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT taylorstephanf segregationofsaliencenetworkpredictstreatmentresponseofdepressiontorepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulation