Cargando…
The Response of Retailers in Scotland to the Standardised Packaging of Tobacco Products Regulations and Tobacco Products Directive
INTRODUCTION: With most marketing channels prohibited, the retail environment has assumed greater importance for tobacco companies, even in markets with a ban on the open display of tobacco products. Research has yet to qualitatively explore how retailers respond to standardized packaging in a count...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6379025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30202853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/nty181 |
_version_ | 1783396022998794240 |
---|---|
author | Purves, Richard I Moodie, Crawford Eadie, Douglas Stead, Martine |
author_facet | Purves, Richard I Moodie, Crawford Eadie, Douglas Stead, Martine |
author_sort | Purves, Richard I |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: With most marketing channels prohibited, the retail environment has assumed greater importance for tobacco companies, even in markets with a ban on the open display of tobacco products. Research has yet to qualitatively explore how retailers respond to standardized packaging in a country where this has been introduced. METHODS: As part of the DISPLAY study, face-to-face interviews were conducted with 24 small retailers in Scotland between May 23 and June 26, 2017; the interviews were conducted after The Standardised Packaging of Tobacco Products Regulations and the Tobacco Products Directive were fully implemented. RESULTS: We found high retailer compliance with the legislation. With price-marked packs and packs containing less than 20 cigarettes and 30 g of rolling tobacco banned, retailers stated that this helped simplify ordering and stock management. The removal of price-marked packs also allowed them some flexibility to set their own prices, but many chose to stick closely to recommended retail price in order to remain competitive and avoid complaints from customers. In contrast to one of the tobacco industry’s arguments against standardized packaging, most retailers suggested that transaction times had not increased, even though the changes had only recently come into force. CONCLUSIONS: This study challenges some of the arguments used against standardized packaging and provides an insight into the storage and pricing strategies adopted by retailers following the removal of price-marked packs. IMPLICATIONS: This study explores the response of the retailers to the introduction of standardized tobacco packaging and provides an insight into the storage and pricing strategies adopted by retailers following the removal of price-marked packs. It explores the importance of the retailer in tobacco companies’ desire to maintain tobacco sales and challenges some of the arguments used against standardized packaging, such as an increase in transaction times. Countries seeking to introduce standardized packaging should monitor the experiences of retailers, preferably from preimplementation through to post implementation, to help understand how retailers respond to this policy and to inform compliance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6379025 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63790252019-02-22 The Response of Retailers in Scotland to the Standardised Packaging of Tobacco Products Regulations and Tobacco Products Directive Purves, Richard I Moodie, Crawford Eadie, Douglas Stead, Martine Nicotine Tob Res Original Investigations INTRODUCTION: With most marketing channels prohibited, the retail environment has assumed greater importance for tobacco companies, even in markets with a ban on the open display of tobacco products. Research has yet to qualitatively explore how retailers respond to standardized packaging in a country where this has been introduced. METHODS: As part of the DISPLAY study, face-to-face interviews were conducted with 24 small retailers in Scotland between May 23 and June 26, 2017; the interviews were conducted after The Standardised Packaging of Tobacco Products Regulations and the Tobacco Products Directive were fully implemented. RESULTS: We found high retailer compliance with the legislation. With price-marked packs and packs containing less than 20 cigarettes and 30 g of rolling tobacco banned, retailers stated that this helped simplify ordering and stock management. The removal of price-marked packs also allowed them some flexibility to set their own prices, but many chose to stick closely to recommended retail price in order to remain competitive and avoid complaints from customers. In contrast to one of the tobacco industry’s arguments against standardized packaging, most retailers suggested that transaction times had not increased, even though the changes had only recently come into force. CONCLUSIONS: This study challenges some of the arguments used against standardized packaging and provides an insight into the storage and pricing strategies adopted by retailers following the removal of price-marked packs. IMPLICATIONS: This study explores the response of the retailers to the introduction of standardized tobacco packaging and provides an insight into the storage and pricing strategies adopted by retailers following the removal of price-marked packs. It explores the importance of the retailer in tobacco companies’ desire to maintain tobacco sales and challenges some of the arguments used against standardized packaging, such as an increase in transaction times. Countries seeking to introduce standardized packaging should monitor the experiences of retailers, preferably from preimplementation through to post implementation, to help understand how retailers respond to this policy and to inform compliance. Oxford University Press 2018-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6379025/ /pubmed/30202853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/nty181 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Investigations Purves, Richard I Moodie, Crawford Eadie, Douglas Stead, Martine The Response of Retailers in Scotland to the Standardised Packaging of Tobacco Products Regulations and Tobacco Products Directive |
title | The Response of Retailers in Scotland to the Standardised Packaging of Tobacco Products Regulations and Tobacco Products Directive |
title_full | The Response of Retailers in Scotland to the Standardised Packaging of Tobacco Products Regulations and Tobacco Products Directive |
title_fullStr | The Response of Retailers in Scotland to the Standardised Packaging of Tobacco Products Regulations and Tobacco Products Directive |
title_full_unstemmed | The Response of Retailers in Scotland to the Standardised Packaging of Tobacco Products Regulations and Tobacco Products Directive |
title_short | The Response of Retailers in Scotland to the Standardised Packaging of Tobacco Products Regulations and Tobacco Products Directive |
title_sort | response of retailers in scotland to the standardised packaging of tobacco products regulations and tobacco products directive |
topic | Original Investigations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6379025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30202853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/nty181 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT purvesrichardi theresponseofretailersinscotlandtothestandardisedpackagingoftobaccoproductsregulationsandtobaccoproductsdirective AT moodiecrawford theresponseofretailersinscotlandtothestandardisedpackagingoftobaccoproductsregulationsandtobaccoproductsdirective AT eadiedouglas theresponseofretailersinscotlandtothestandardisedpackagingoftobaccoproductsregulationsandtobaccoproductsdirective AT steadmartine theresponseofretailersinscotlandtothestandardisedpackagingoftobaccoproductsregulationsandtobaccoproductsdirective AT purvesrichardi responseofretailersinscotlandtothestandardisedpackagingoftobaccoproductsregulationsandtobaccoproductsdirective AT moodiecrawford responseofretailersinscotlandtothestandardisedpackagingoftobaccoproductsregulationsandtobaccoproductsdirective AT eadiedouglas responseofretailersinscotlandtothestandardisedpackagingoftobaccoproductsregulationsandtobaccoproductsdirective AT steadmartine responseofretailersinscotlandtothestandardisedpackagingoftobaccoproductsregulationsandtobaccoproductsdirective |