Cargando…

Diagnostic accuracy of a deep learning approach to calculate FFR from coronary CT angiography

BACKGROUND: The computational fluid dynamics (CFD) approach has been frequently applied to compute the fractional flow reserve (FFR) using computed tomography angiography (CTA). This technique is efficient. We developed the DEEPVESSEL-FFR platform using the emerging deep learning technique to calcul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Zhi-Qiang, Zhou, Yu-Jie, Zhao, Ying-Xin, Shi, Dong-Mei, Liu, Yu-Yang, Liu, Wei, Liu, Xiao-Li, Li, Yue-Ping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Science Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6379239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30800150
http://dx.doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.01.010
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The computational fluid dynamics (CFD) approach has been frequently applied to compute the fractional flow reserve (FFR) using computed tomography angiography (CTA). This technique is efficient. We developed the DEEPVESSEL-FFR platform using the emerging deep learning technique to calculate the FFR value out of CTA images in five minutes. This study is to evaluate the DEEPVESSEL-FFR platform using the emerging deep learning technique to calculate the FFR value from CTA images as an efficient method. METHODS: A single-center, prospective study was conducted and 63 patients were enrolled for the evaluation of the diagnostic performance of DEEPVESSEL-FFR. Automatic quantification method for the three-dimensional coronary arterial geometry and the deep learning based prediction of FFR were developed to assess the ischemic risk of the stenotic coronary arteries. Diagnostic performance of the DEEPVESSEL-FFR was assessed by using wire-based FFR as reference standard. The primary evaluation factor was defined by using the area under receiver-operation characteristics curve (AUC) analysis. RESULTS: For per-patient level, taking the cut-off value ≤ 0.8 referring to the FFR measurement, DEEPVESSEL-FFR presented higher diagnostic performance in determining ischemia-related lesions with area under the curve of 0.928 compare to CTA stenotic severity 0.664. DEEPVESSEL-FFR correlated with FFR (R = 0.686, P < 0.001), with a mean difference of –0.006 ± 0.0091 (P = 0.619). The secondary evaluation factors, indicating per vessel accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 87.3%, 97.14%, 75%, 82.93%, and 95.45%, respectively. CONCLUSION: DEEPVESSEL-FFR is a novel method that allows efficient assessment of the functional significance of coronary stenosis.