Cargando…

LH Levels May Be Used as an Indicator for the Time of Antagonist Administration in GnRH Antagonist Protocols—A Proof-Of-Concept Study

Objective: To investigate whether circulating LH levels could be used as an indicator for the timing of antagonist addition in GnRH antagonist protocol. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: University-based hospital. Patients: A total of 567 women stimulated with recombinant FSH monotherapy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Minghui, Liu, Shan, Li, Lingxiu, Wang, Peng, Li, Huanhuan, Li, Yuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6379248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30809195
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2019.00067
_version_ 1783396038349946880
author Liu, Minghui
Liu, Shan
Li, Lingxiu
Wang, Peng
Li, Huanhuan
Li, Yuan
author_facet Liu, Minghui
Liu, Shan
Li, Lingxiu
Wang, Peng
Li, Huanhuan
Li, Yuan
author_sort Liu, Minghui
collection PubMed
description Objective: To investigate whether circulating LH levels could be used as an indicator for the timing of antagonist addition in GnRH antagonist protocol. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: University-based hospital. Patients: A total of 567 women stimulated with recombinant FSH monotherapy in a GnRH antagonist protocol were studied. Among them, 256 patients showed relatively low LH levels [highest LH level (LHmax) < 4 IU/L] during the entire ovarian stimulation process; 88 (Group A) and 168 patients (Group B) were stimulated without and with antagonist co-treatment, respectively. The remaining 311 patients had LHmax≥4 IU/L and were stimulated with a modified flexible antagonist protocol based on LH levels (Group C). Intervention(s): Patients in Group B and C received antagonist during ovarian stimulation, whereas patients in Group A did not. Main outcome measure: Clinical pregnancy rate and ongoing pregnancy rate. Results: The clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates were significantly higher in group A than group B (69.3 vs. 54.7%, P = 0.03 and 62.5 vs. 48.2%, P = 0.04, respectively), but the primary outcome measures did not differ between groups B and C. There were no significant differences in terms of patient demographics, LH levels, total dosage of gonadotrophin, duration of stimulation, follicular output rate between groups A and B, and between groups B and C. Also, there were no significant differences in laboratory and clinical outcomes in pairwise group comparisons. No canceled cycles due to premature ovulation was reported among the treated patients. Conclusion: LH levels may be used as an indicator for the time of antagonist addition. Patients with sustained low LH levels (LHmax<4 IU/L) during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) might not require antagonist administration. Although further well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to confirm our results, a novel treatment regimen based on LH measurements during COS might provide clinicians new insights about when to start antagonist administration in the GnRH antagonist protocol.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6379248
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63792482019-02-26 LH Levels May Be Used as an Indicator for the Time of Antagonist Administration in GnRH Antagonist Protocols—A Proof-Of-Concept Study Liu, Minghui Liu, Shan Li, Lingxiu Wang, Peng Li, Huanhuan Li, Yuan Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology Objective: To investigate whether circulating LH levels could be used as an indicator for the timing of antagonist addition in GnRH antagonist protocol. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: University-based hospital. Patients: A total of 567 women stimulated with recombinant FSH monotherapy in a GnRH antagonist protocol were studied. Among them, 256 patients showed relatively low LH levels [highest LH level (LHmax) < 4 IU/L] during the entire ovarian stimulation process; 88 (Group A) and 168 patients (Group B) were stimulated without and with antagonist co-treatment, respectively. The remaining 311 patients had LHmax≥4 IU/L and were stimulated with a modified flexible antagonist protocol based on LH levels (Group C). Intervention(s): Patients in Group B and C received antagonist during ovarian stimulation, whereas patients in Group A did not. Main outcome measure: Clinical pregnancy rate and ongoing pregnancy rate. Results: The clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates were significantly higher in group A than group B (69.3 vs. 54.7%, P = 0.03 and 62.5 vs. 48.2%, P = 0.04, respectively), but the primary outcome measures did not differ between groups B and C. There were no significant differences in terms of patient demographics, LH levels, total dosage of gonadotrophin, duration of stimulation, follicular output rate between groups A and B, and between groups B and C. Also, there were no significant differences in laboratory and clinical outcomes in pairwise group comparisons. No canceled cycles due to premature ovulation was reported among the treated patients. Conclusion: LH levels may be used as an indicator for the time of antagonist addition. Patients with sustained low LH levels (LHmax<4 IU/L) during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) might not require antagonist administration. Although further well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to confirm our results, a novel treatment regimen based on LH measurements during COS might provide clinicians new insights about when to start antagonist administration in the GnRH antagonist protocol. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6379248/ /pubmed/30809195 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2019.00067 Text en Copyright © 2019 Liu, Liu, Li, Wang, Li and Li. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Liu, Minghui
Liu, Shan
Li, Lingxiu
Wang, Peng
Li, Huanhuan
Li, Yuan
LH Levels May Be Used as an Indicator for the Time of Antagonist Administration in GnRH Antagonist Protocols—A Proof-Of-Concept Study
title LH Levels May Be Used as an Indicator for the Time of Antagonist Administration in GnRH Antagonist Protocols—A Proof-Of-Concept Study
title_full LH Levels May Be Used as an Indicator for the Time of Antagonist Administration in GnRH Antagonist Protocols—A Proof-Of-Concept Study
title_fullStr LH Levels May Be Used as an Indicator for the Time of Antagonist Administration in GnRH Antagonist Protocols—A Proof-Of-Concept Study
title_full_unstemmed LH Levels May Be Used as an Indicator for the Time of Antagonist Administration in GnRH Antagonist Protocols—A Proof-Of-Concept Study
title_short LH Levels May Be Used as an Indicator for the Time of Antagonist Administration in GnRH Antagonist Protocols—A Proof-Of-Concept Study
title_sort lh levels may be used as an indicator for the time of antagonist administration in gnrh antagonist protocols—a proof-of-concept study
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6379248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30809195
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2019.00067
work_keys_str_mv AT liuminghui lhlevelsmaybeusedasanindicatorforthetimeofantagonistadministrationingnrhantagonistprotocolsaproofofconceptstudy
AT liushan lhlevelsmaybeusedasanindicatorforthetimeofantagonistadministrationingnrhantagonistprotocolsaproofofconceptstudy
AT lilingxiu lhlevelsmaybeusedasanindicatorforthetimeofantagonistadministrationingnrhantagonistprotocolsaproofofconceptstudy
AT wangpeng lhlevelsmaybeusedasanindicatorforthetimeofantagonistadministrationingnrhantagonistprotocolsaproofofconceptstudy
AT lihuanhuan lhlevelsmaybeusedasanindicatorforthetimeofantagonistadministrationingnrhantagonistprotocolsaproofofconceptstudy
AT liyuan lhlevelsmaybeusedasanindicatorforthetimeofantagonistadministrationingnrhantagonistprotocolsaproofofconceptstudy