Cargando…

Anodal tDCS and High-Frequency tRNS Targeting the Occipitotemporal Cortex Do Not Always Enhance Face Perception

There has been increasing interest in the utility of transcranial electrical stimulation as a tool to enhance cognitive abilities. In the domain of face perception, enhancements have been reported for both transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and high-frequency transcranial random noise st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Willis, Megan L., Costantino, Andrea I., Nitsche, Michael. A., Palermo, Romina, Rivolta, Davide
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6379483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30809116
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00078
_version_ 1783396097057619968
author Willis, Megan L.
Costantino, Andrea I.
Nitsche, Michael. A.
Palermo, Romina
Rivolta, Davide
author_facet Willis, Megan L.
Costantino, Andrea I.
Nitsche, Michael. A.
Palermo, Romina
Rivolta, Davide
author_sort Willis, Megan L.
collection PubMed
description There has been increasing interest in the utility of transcranial electrical stimulation as a tool to enhance cognitive abilities. In the domain of face perception, enhancements have been reported for both transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and high-frequency transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) targeting the occipitotemporal cortex. In a series of two experiments, we attempted to replicate these findings for face identity perception, and extend on previous studies, to determine if similar enhancements are also observed for object and facial expression perception. In Experiment 1, using a single blind, between-subjects design in healthy volunteers (N = 53), we examined whether anodal tDCS over the occipitotemporal cortex enhanced performance on tasks involving perception of face identity, facial expression, and object stimuli, when compared to sham stimulation. We failed to replicate previous findings of enhanced performance on face and object perception, nor extend findings to facial expression perception. In Experiment 2, using a single blind, between-subjects design (N = 39), we examined the effect of high-frequency tRNS over the occipitotemporal cortex using the same three tasks employed in Experiment 1. We failed to replicate previous findings of enhanced face perception following high-frequency tRNS over the occipitotemporal cortex, relative to sham stimulation (although we used different stimulation parameters to that employed in a previous study). We also found no evidence of enhanced facial expression and object perception following high-frequency tRNS. The findings align with a growing body of studies that have failed to replicate previously reported enhancements following administration of tDCS and hint for different efficacy of, on first sight, related stimulation protocols. Future studies should explore the foundation of these differential effects in greater detail.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6379483
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63794832019-02-26 Anodal tDCS and High-Frequency tRNS Targeting the Occipitotemporal Cortex Do Not Always Enhance Face Perception Willis, Megan L. Costantino, Andrea I. Nitsche, Michael. A. Palermo, Romina Rivolta, Davide Front Neurosci Neuroscience There has been increasing interest in the utility of transcranial electrical stimulation as a tool to enhance cognitive abilities. In the domain of face perception, enhancements have been reported for both transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and high-frequency transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) targeting the occipitotemporal cortex. In a series of two experiments, we attempted to replicate these findings for face identity perception, and extend on previous studies, to determine if similar enhancements are also observed for object and facial expression perception. In Experiment 1, using a single blind, between-subjects design in healthy volunteers (N = 53), we examined whether anodal tDCS over the occipitotemporal cortex enhanced performance on tasks involving perception of face identity, facial expression, and object stimuli, when compared to sham stimulation. We failed to replicate previous findings of enhanced performance on face and object perception, nor extend findings to facial expression perception. In Experiment 2, using a single blind, between-subjects design (N = 39), we examined the effect of high-frequency tRNS over the occipitotemporal cortex using the same three tasks employed in Experiment 1. We failed to replicate previous findings of enhanced face perception following high-frequency tRNS over the occipitotemporal cortex, relative to sham stimulation (although we used different stimulation parameters to that employed in a previous study). We also found no evidence of enhanced facial expression and object perception following high-frequency tRNS. The findings align with a growing body of studies that have failed to replicate previously reported enhancements following administration of tDCS and hint for different efficacy of, on first sight, related stimulation protocols. Future studies should explore the foundation of these differential effects in greater detail. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6379483/ /pubmed/30809116 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00078 Text en Copyright © 2019 Willis, Costantino, Nitsche, Palermo and Rivolta. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Willis, Megan L.
Costantino, Andrea I.
Nitsche, Michael. A.
Palermo, Romina
Rivolta, Davide
Anodal tDCS and High-Frequency tRNS Targeting the Occipitotemporal Cortex Do Not Always Enhance Face Perception
title Anodal tDCS and High-Frequency tRNS Targeting the Occipitotemporal Cortex Do Not Always Enhance Face Perception
title_full Anodal tDCS and High-Frequency tRNS Targeting the Occipitotemporal Cortex Do Not Always Enhance Face Perception
title_fullStr Anodal tDCS and High-Frequency tRNS Targeting the Occipitotemporal Cortex Do Not Always Enhance Face Perception
title_full_unstemmed Anodal tDCS and High-Frequency tRNS Targeting the Occipitotemporal Cortex Do Not Always Enhance Face Perception
title_short Anodal tDCS and High-Frequency tRNS Targeting the Occipitotemporal Cortex Do Not Always Enhance Face Perception
title_sort anodal tdcs and high-frequency trns targeting the occipitotemporal cortex do not always enhance face perception
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6379483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30809116
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00078
work_keys_str_mv AT willismeganl anodaltdcsandhighfrequencytrnstargetingtheoccipitotemporalcortexdonotalwaysenhancefaceperception
AT costantinoandreai anodaltdcsandhighfrequencytrnstargetingtheoccipitotemporalcortexdonotalwaysenhancefaceperception
AT nitschemichaela anodaltdcsandhighfrequencytrnstargetingtheoccipitotemporalcortexdonotalwaysenhancefaceperception
AT palermoromina anodaltdcsandhighfrequencytrnstargetingtheoccipitotemporalcortexdonotalwaysenhancefaceperception
AT rivoltadavide anodaltdcsandhighfrequencytrnstargetingtheoccipitotemporalcortexdonotalwaysenhancefaceperception