Cargando…

Plasma Profiles of Inflammatory Markers Associated With Active Tuberculosis in Antiretroviral Therapy-Naive Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Positive Individuals

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-coinfected individuals is challenging. We hypothesized that combinations of inflammatory markers could facilitate identification of active TB in HIV-positive individuals. METHODS: Participants were HIV-positive, treatme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olsson, Oskar, Björkman, Per, Jansson, Marianne, Balcha, Taye Tolera, Mulleta, Daba, Yeba, Habtamu, Valfridsson, Christine, Carlsson, Fredric, Skogmar, Sten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6379652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30800697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz015
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-coinfected individuals is challenging. We hypothesized that combinations of inflammatory markers could facilitate identification of active TB in HIV-positive individuals. METHODS: Participants were HIV-positive, treatment-naive adults systematically investigated for TB at Ethiopian health centers. Plasma samples from 130 subjects with TB (HIV(+)/TB(+)) and 130 subjects without TB (HIV(+)/TB(−)) were tested for concentration of the following markers: CCL5, C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin (IL)-6, IL12-p70, IL-18, IL-27, interferon-γ-induced protein-10 (IP-10), procalcitonin (PCT), and soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR). Analyzed markers were then assessed, either individually or in combination, with regard to infection status, CD4 cell count, and HIV ribonucleic acid (RNA) levels. RESULTS: The HIV(+)/TB(+) subjects had higher levels of all markers, except IL12p70, compared with HIV(+)/TB(−) subjects. The CRP showed the best performance for TB identification (median 27.9 vs 1.8 mg/L for HIV(+)/TB(+) and HIV(+)/TB(−), respectively; area under the curve [AUC]: 0.80). Performance was increased when CRP was combined with suPAR analysis (AUC, 0.83 [0.93 for subjects with CD4 cell count <200 cells/mm(3)]). Irrespective of TB status, IP-10 concentrations correlated with HIV RNA levels, and both IP-10 and IL-18 were inversely correlated to CD4 cell counts. CONCLUSIONS: Although CRP showed the best single marker discriminatory potential, combining CRP and suPAR analyses increased performance for TB identification.