Cargando…

No significant difference in clinically relevant findings between Pillcam(®) SB3 and Pillcam(®) SB2 capsules in a United States veteran population

BACKGROUND: Capsule endoscopy (CE) allows for a non-invasive small bowel evaluation for a wide range of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and diseases. Capsule technology has been rapidly advancing over recent years, often improving image frequency and quality. The Pillcam(®) SB3 (SB3) capsule is one s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aasen, Tyler D, Wilhoite, David, Rahman, Aynur, Devani, Kalpit, Young, Mark, Swenson, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6379749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30788031
http://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v11.i2.124
_version_ 1783396159581061120
author Aasen, Tyler D
Wilhoite, David
Rahman, Aynur
Devani, Kalpit
Young, Mark
Swenson, James
author_facet Aasen, Tyler D
Wilhoite, David
Rahman, Aynur
Devani, Kalpit
Young, Mark
Swenson, James
author_sort Aasen, Tyler D
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Capsule endoscopy (CE) allows for a non-invasive small bowel evaluation for a wide range of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and diseases. Capsule technology has been rapidly advancing over recent years, often improving image frequency and quality. The Pillcam(®) SB3 (SB3) capsule is one such technology that offers an adaptive frame rate advantage over the previous versions of the capsule the Pillcam(®) SB2 (SB2). Some have proposed that this improvement in capsule technology may lead to increased diagnostic yields; however, real world clinical data is currently lacking. AIM: To evaluate the clinically relevant findings of SB3 and SB2 capsules in a population of United States veterans. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 260 consecutive CE studies was performed including 130 SB3 and 130 SB2 capsule studies. Recorded variables included: age, gender, type of capsule, body mass index, exam completion, inpatient status, opioid use, diabetes, quality of preparation, gastric transit time, small bowel transit time, indication, finding, and if the exam resulted in a change in clinical management. The primary outcome measured was the detection of clinically relevant findings between SB3 and SB2 capsules. RESULTS: Mean age of the study population was 67.1 ± 10.4 years and 94.2% of patients were male. Of these 28.1% were on opioid users. The most common indications for capsule procedure were occult GI bleeding (74.6%) and overt GI bleeding (14.6%). Rates of incomplete exam were similar between SB3 and SB2 groups (16.9% vs 9.2%, P = 0.066). The overall rate of clinically relevant finding was 48.9% in our study. No significant difference was observed in SB3 vs SB2 capsules for clinically relevant findings (46.2% vs 51.5%, P = 0.385) or change in clinical management (40.8% vs 50.0%, P = 0.135). CONCLUSION: Our study found no significant difference in clinically relevant findings between SB3 and SB2 capsules.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6379749
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63797492019-02-20 No significant difference in clinically relevant findings between Pillcam(®) SB3 and Pillcam(®) SB2 capsules in a United States veteran population Aasen, Tyler D Wilhoite, David Rahman, Aynur Devani, Kalpit Young, Mark Swenson, James World J Gastrointest Endosc Retrospective Cohort Study BACKGROUND: Capsule endoscopy (CE) allows for a non-invasive small bowel evaluation for a wide range of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and diseases. Capsule technology has been rapidly advancing over recent years, often improving image frequency and quality. The Pillcam(®) SB3 (SB3) capsule is one such technology that offers an adaptive frame rate advantage over the previous versions of the capsule the Pillcam(®) SB2 (SB2). Some have proposed that this improvement in capsule technology may lead to increased diagnostic yields; however, real world clinical data is currently lacking. AIM: To evaluate the clinically relevant findings of SB3 and SB2 capsules in a population of United States veterans. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 260 consecutive CE studies was performed including 130 SB3 and 130 SB2 capsule studies. Recorded variables included: age, gender, type of capsule, body mass index, exam completion, inpatient status, opioid use, diabetes, quality of preparation, gastric transit time, small bowel transit time, indication, finding, and if the exam resulted in a change in clinical management. The primary outcome measured was the detection of clinically relevant findings between SB3 and SB2 capsules. RESULTS: Mean age of the study population was 67.1 ± 10.4 years and 94.2% of patients were male. Of these 28.1% were on opioid users. The most common indications for capsule procedure were occult GI bleeding (74.6%) and overt GI bleeding (14.6%). Rates of incomplete exam were similar between SB3 and SB2 groups (16.9% vs 9.2%, P = 0.066). The overall rate of clinically relevant finding was 48.9% in our study. No significant difference was observed in SB3 vs SB2 capsules for clinically relevant findings (46.2% vs 51.5%, P = 0.385) or change in clinical management (40.8% vs 50.0%, P = 0.135). CONCLUSION: Our study found no significant difference in clinically relevant findings between SB3 and SB2 capsules. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2019-02-16 2019-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6379749/ /pubmed/30788031 http://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v11.i2.124 Text en ©The Author(s) 2019. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Retrospective Cohort Study
Aasen, Tyler D
Wilhoite, David
Rahman, Aynur
Devani, Kalpit
Young, Mark
Swenson, James
No significant difference in clinically relevant findings between Pillcam(®) SB3 and Pillcam(®) SB2 capsules in a United States veteran population
title No significant difference in clinically relevant findings between Pillcam(®) SB3 and Pillcam(®) SB2 capsules in a United States veteran population
title_full No significant difference in clinically relevant findings between Pillcam(®) SB3 and Pillcam(®) SB2 capsules in a United States veteran population
title_fullStr No significant difference in clinically relevant findings between Pillcam(®) SB3 and Pillcam(®) SB2 capsules in a United States veteran population
title_full_unstemmed No significant difference in clinically relevant findings between Pillcam(®) SB3 and Pillcam(®) SB2 capsules in a United States veteran population
title_short No significant difference in clinically relevant findings between Pillcam(®) SB3 and Pillcam(®) SB2 capsules in a United States veteran population
title_sort no significant difference in clinically relevant findings between pillcam(®) sb3 and pillcam(®) sb2 capsules in a united states veteran population
topic Retrospective Cohort Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6379749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30788031
http://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v11.i2.124
work_keys_str_mv AT aasentylerd nosignificantdifferenceinclinicallyrelevantfindingsbetweenpillcamsb3andpillcamsb2capsulesinaunitedstatesveteranpopulation
AT wilhoitedavid nosignificantdifferenceinclinicallyrelevantfindingsbetweenpillcamsb3andpillcamsb2capsulesinaunitedstatesveteranpopulation
AT rahmanaynur nosignificantdifferenceinclinicallyrelevantfindingsbetweenpillcamsb3andpillcamsb2capsulesinaunitedstatesveteranpopulation
AT devanikalpit nosignificantdifferenceinclinicallyrelevantfindingsbetweenpillcamsb3andpillcamsb2capsulesinaunitedstatesveteranpopulation
AT youngmark nosignificantdifferenceinclinicallyrelevantfindingsbetweenpillcamsb3andpillcamsb2capsulesinaunitedstatesveteranpopulation
AT swensonjames nosignificantdifferenceinclinicallyrelevantfindingsbetweenpillcamsb3andpillcamsb2capsulesinaunitedstatesveteranpopulation