Cargando…

Bone Response to Porous Alumina Implants Coated with Bioactive Materials, Observed Using Different Characterization Techniques

BACKGROUND: Implants or implantable devices should integrate into the host tissue faster than fibrous capsule formation, in which the design of the interface is one of the biggest challenges. Generally, bioactive materials are not viable for load-bearing applications, so inert biomaterials are propo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Camilo, Claudia C., Silveira, Celey A.E., Faeda, Rafael S., de Almeida Rollo, João M.D., de Moraes Purquerio, Benedito, Fortulan, Carlos Alberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6379886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28574101
http://dx.doi.org/10.5301/jabfm.5000347
_version_ 1783396208335650816
author Camilo, Claudia C.
Silveira, Celey A.E.
Faeda, Rafael S.
de Almeida Rollo, João M.D.
de Moraes Purquerio, Benedito
Fortulan, Carlos Alberto
author_facet Camilo, Claudia C.
Silveira, Celey A.E.
Faeda, Rafael S.
de Almeida Rollo, João M.D.
de Moraes Purquerio, Benedito
Fortulan, Carlos Alberto
author_sort Camilo, Claudia C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Implants or implantable devices should integrate into the host tissue faster than fibrous capsule formation, in which the design of the interface is one of the biggest challenges. Generally, bioactive materials are not viable for load-bearing applications, so inert biomaterials are proposed. However, the surface must be modified through techniques such as coating with bioactive materials, roughness and sized pores. The aim of this research was to validate an approach for the evaluation of the tissue growth on implants of porous alumina coated with bioactive materials. METHODS: Porous alumina implants were coated with 45S5 Bioglass® (BG) and hydroxyapatite (HA) and implanted in rat tibiae for a period of 28 days. Ex vivo resections were performed to analyze osseointegration, along with histological analysis, Scanning Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive X-Ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX) line scanning, radiography and biomechanical testing. RESULTS: Given that the process of implant integration needs with the bone tissue to be accelerated, it was then seen that BG acted to start the rapid integration, and HA acted to sustaining the process. CONCLUSIONS: Inert materials coated with bioglass and HA present a potential for application as bone substitutes, preferably with pores of diameters between 100 μm and 400 μm and, restrict for smaller than 100 μm, because it prevents pores without organized tissue formation or vacant. Designed as functional gradient material, stand out for applications in bone tissue under load, where, being the porous surface responsible for the osseointegration and the inner material to bear and to transmit the loads.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6379886
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63798862019-06-03 Bone Response to Porous Alumina Implants Coated with Bioactive Materials, Observed Using Different Characterization Techniques Camilo, Claudia C. Silveira, Celey A.E. Faeda, Rafael S. de Almeida Rollo, João M.D. de Moraes Purquerio, Benedito Fortulan, Carlos Alberto J Appl Biomater Funct Mater Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Implants or implantable devices should integrate into the host tissue faster than fibrous capsule formation, in which the design of the interface is one of the biggest challenges. Generally, bioactive materials are not viable for load-bearing applications, so inert biomaterials are proposed. However, the surface must be modified through techniques such as coating with bioactive materials, roughness and sized pores. The aim of this research was to validate an approach for the evaluation of the tissue growth on implants of porous alumina coated with bioactive materials. METHODS: Porous alumina implants were coated with 45S5 Bioglass® (BG) and hydroxyapatite (HA) and implanted in rat tibiae for a period of 28 days. Ex vivo resections were performed to analyze osseointegration, along with histological analysis, Scanning Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive X-Ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX) line scanning, radiography and biomechanical testing. RESULTS: Given that the process of implant integration needs with the bone tissue to be accelerated, it was then seen that BG acted to start the rapid integration, and HA acted to sustaining the process. CONCLUSIONS: Inert materials coated with bioglass and HA present a potential for application as bone substitutes, preferably with pores of diameters between 100 μm and 400 μm and, restrict for smaller than 100 μm, because it prevents pores without organized tissue formation or vacant. Designed as functional gradient material, stand out for applications in bone tissue under load, where, being the porous surface responsible for the osseointegration and the inner material to bear and to transmit the loads. SAGE Publications 2017-05-24 2017-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6379886/ /pubmed/28574101 http://dx.doi.org/10.5301/jabfm.5000347 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Camilo, Claudia C.
Silveira, Celey A.E.
Faeda, Rafael S.
de Almeida Rollo, João M.D.
de Moraes Purquerio, Benedito
Fortulan, Carlos Alberto
Bone Response to Porous Alumina Implants Coated with Bioactive Materials, Observed Using Different Characterization Techniques
title Bone Response to Porous Alumina Implants Coated with Bioactive Materials, Observed Using Different Characterization Techniques
title_full Bone Response to Porous Alumina Implants Coated with Bioactive Materials, Observed Using Different Characterization Techniques
title_fullStr Bone Response to Porous Alumina Implants Coated with Bioactive Materials, Observed Using Different Characterization Techniques
title_full_unstemmed Bone Response to Porous Alumina Implants Coated with Bioactive Materials, Observed Using Different Characterization Techniques
title_short Bone Response to Porous Alumina Implants Coated with Bioactive Materials, Observed Using Different Characterization Techniques
title_sort bone response to porous alumina implants coated with bioactive materials, observed using different characterization techniques
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6379886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28574101
http://dx.doi.org/10.5301/jabfm.5000347
work_keys_str_mv AT camiloclaudiac boneresponsetoporousaluminaimplantscoatedwithbioactivematerialsobservedusingdifferentcharacterizationtechniques
AT silveiraceleyae boneresponsetoporousaluminaimplantscoatedwithbioactivematerialsobservedusingdifferentcharacterizationtechniques
AT faedarafaels boneresponsetoporousaluminaimplantscoatedwithbioactivematerialsobservedusingdifferentcharacterizationtechniques
AT dealmeidarollojoaomd boneresponsetoporousaluminaimplantscoatedwithbioactivematerialsobservedusingdifferentcharacterizationtechniques
AT demoraespurqueriobenedito boneresponsetoporousaluminaimplantscoatedwithbioactivematerialsobservedusingdifferentcharacterizationtechniques
AT fortulancarlosalberto boneresponsetoporousaluminaimplantscoatedwithbioactivematerialsobservedusingdifferentcharacterizationtechniques