Cargando…
Stakeholders’ perceptions of policy options to support the integration of community health workers in health systems
BACKGROUND: Community health workers (CHWs) are an important component of the health workforce in many countries. The World Health Organization (WHO) has developed a guideline to support the integration of CHWs into health systems. This study assesses stakeholders’ valuation of outcomes of interest,...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6379925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30777095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-019-0348-6 |
_version_ | 1783396211317800960 |
---|---|
author | Ajuebor, Onyema Cometto, Giorgio Boniol, Mathieu Akl, Elie A. |
author_facet | Ajuebor, Onyema Cometto, Giorgio Boniol, Mathieu Akl, Elie A. |
author_sort | Ajuebor, Onyema |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Community health workers (CHWs) are an important component of the health workforce in many countries. The World Health Organization (WHO) has developed a guideline to support the integration of CHWs into health systems. This study assesses stakeholders’ valuation of outcomes of interest, acceptability and feasibility of policy options considered for the CHW guideline development. METHODS: A cross-sectional mixed methods (quantitative and qualitative) study targeting stakeholders involved directly or indirectly in country implementation of CHW programmes was conducted in 2017. Data was collected from 96 stakeholders from five WHO regions using an online questionnaire. A Likert scale (1 to 9) was used to grade participants’ assessments of the outcomes of interest, and the acceptability and feasibility of policy options were considered. RESULTS: All outcomes of interest were considered by at least 90% of participants as ‘important’ or ‘critical’. Most critical outcomes were ‘improved quality of CHW health services’ and ‘increased health service coverage’ (91.5% and 86.2% participants judging them as ‘critical’ respectively). Out of 40 policy options, 35 were considered as ‘definitely acceptable’ and 36 ‘definitely feasible’ by most participants. The least acceptable option (37% of participants rating ‘definitely not acceptable’) was the selection of candidates based on age. The least feasible option (29% of participants rating ‘definitely not feasible’) was the selection of CHWs with a minimum of secondary education. CONCLUSION: Outcomes of interest and policy options proposed were rated highly by most stakeholders. This finding helps to reinforce their usefulness in meeting the expectations of the CHW guideline end-users to properly integrate CHWs into health systems. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12960-019-0348-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6379925 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63799252019-02-28 Stakeholders’ perceptions of policy options to support the integration of community health workers in health systems Ajuebor, Onyema Cometto, Giorgio Boniol, Mathieu Akl, Elie A. Hum Resour Health Research BACKGROUND: Community health workers (CHWs) are an important component of the health workforce in many countries. The World Health Organization (WHO) has developed a guideline to support the integration of CHWs into health systems. This study assesses stakeholders’ valuation of outcomes of interest, acceptability and feasibility of policy options considered for the CHW guideline development. METHODS: A cross-sectional mixed methods (quantitative and qualitative) study targeting stakeholders involved directly or indirectly in country implementation of CHW programmes was conducted in 2017. Data was collected from 96 stakeholders from five WHO regions using an online questionnaire. A Likert scale (1 to 9) was used to grade participants’ assessments of the outcomes of interest, and the acceptability and feasibility of policy options were considered. RESULTS: All outcomes of interest were considered by at least 90% of participants as ‘important’ or ‘critical’. Most critical outcomes were ‘improved quality of CHW health services’ and ‘increased health service coverage’ (91.5% and 86.2% participants judging them as ‘critical’ respectively). Out of 40 policy options, 35 were considered as ‘definitely acceptable’ and 36 ‘definitely feasible’ by most participants. The least acceptable option (37% of participants rating ‘definitely not acceptable’) was the selection of candidates based on age. The least feasible option (29% of participants rating ‘definitely not feasible’) was the selection of CHWs with a minimum of secondary education. CONCLUSION: Outcomes of interest and policy options proposed were rated highly by most stakeholders. This finding helps to reinforce their usefulness in meeting the expectations of the CHW guideline end-users to properly integrate CHWs into health systems. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12960-019-0348-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6379925/ /pubmed/30777095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-019-0348-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Ajuebor, Onyema Cometto, Giorgio Boniol, Mathieu Akl, Elie A. Stakeholders’ perceptions of policy options to support the integration of community health workers in health systems |
title | Stakeholders’ perceptions of policy options to support the integration of community health workers in health systems |
title_full | Stakeholders’ perceptions of policy options to support the integration of community health workers in health systems |
title_fullStr | Stakeholders’ perceptions of policy options to support the integration of community health workers in health systems |
title_full_unstemmed | Stakeholders’ perceptions of policy options to support the integration of community health workers in health systems |
title_short | Stakeholders’ perceptions of policy options to support the integration of community health workers in health systems |
title_sort | stakeholders’ perceptions of policy options to support the integration of community health workers in health systems |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6379925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30777095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-019-0348-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ajueboronyema stakeholdersperceptionsofpolicyoptionstosupporttheintegrationofcommunityhealthworkersinhealthsystems AT comettogiorgio stakeholdersperceptionsofpolicyoptionstosupporttheintegrationofcommunityhealthworkersinhealthsystems AT boniolmathieu stakeholdersperceptionsofpolicyoptionstosupporttheintegrationofcommunityhealthworkersinhealthsystems AT akleliea stakeholdersperceptionsofpolicyoptionstosupporttheintegrationofcommunityhealthworkersinhealthsystems |