Cargando…

Normal Population Reference Values for the Oxford and Harris Hip Scores – Electronic Data Collection and its Implications for Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess whether the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) were comparable in normal, healthy, pathology-free individuals of different age, gender, ethnicity, handedness and nationality. The purpose of this study was to establish normal populati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McLean, James M., Cappelletto, Jacob, Clarnette, Jock, Hill, Catherine L., Gill, Tiffany, Mandziak, Daniel, Leith, Jordan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6380093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27886359
http://dx.doi.org/10.5301/hipint.5000465
_version_ 1783396252148301824
author McLean, James M.
Cappelletto, Jacob
Clarnette, Jock
Hill, Catherine L.
Gill, Tiffany
Mandziak, Daniel
Leith, Jordan
author_facet McLean, James M.
Cappelletto, Jacob
Clarnette, Jock
Hill, Catherine L.
Gill, Tiffany
Mandziak, Daniel
Leith, Jordan
author_sort McLean, James M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess whether the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) were comparable in normal, healthy, pathology-free individuals of different age, gender, ethnicity, handedness and nationality. The purpose of this study was to establish normal population values for the HHS and OHS using an electronic data collection system. METHODS: 317 Australian and 310 Canadian citizens with no active hip pain, injury or pathology in the ipsilateral hip corresponding to their dominant arm, were evaluated. Participants completed an electronically-administered questionnaire and were assessed clinically. Chi-square tests, Fisher's exact test and Poisson regression models were used where appropriate, to investigate the association between hip scores, ethnicity, nationality, gender, handedness and age. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant association between the OHS and age (p<0.0001) and the HHS and age (p = 0.0006); demonstrating that as age increased, normal hip scores decreased. There was no statistically significant association between the HHS and gender (p = 0.1389); or HSS and nationality, adjusting for age (p = 0.5698) and adjusting for gender (p = 0.6997). There was no statistically significant association between the OHS and gender (p = 0.1350). Australians reported a statistically significant 4.2% higher overall OHS value compared to Canadians (p = 0.0490). There was no statistically significant association between the OHS and nationality in age groups 18-79 years. Participants >80 years reported a statistically significant association between the OHS and nationality (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Studies using an electronic control group should consider differences in gender, age, ethnicity and nationality when using the HHS and OHS to assess patient outcomes. This study has established an electronic, normal control group for studies using the HHS and OHS. When using the OHS, the control group should be sourced from the same country of origin. When using the HHS, the control group should be sourced from a pre-established control group within a database, without necessarily being sourced from the same country of origin.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6380093
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63800932019-06-03 Normal Population Reference Values for the Oxford and Harris Hip Scores – Electronic Data Collection and its Implications for Clinical Practice McLean, James M. Cappelletto, Jacob Clarnette, Jock Hill, Catherine L. Gill, Tiffany Mandziak, Daniel Leith, Jordan Hip Int Original Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess whether the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) were comparable in normal, healthy, pathology-free individuals of different age, gender, ethnicity, handedness and nationality. The purpose of this study was to establish normal population values for the HHS and OHS using an electronic data collection system. METHODS: 317 Australian and 310 Canadian citizens with no active hip pain, injury or pathology in the ipsilateral hip corresponding to their dominant arm, were evaluated. Participants completed an electronically-administered questionnaire and were assessed clinically. Chi-square tests, Fisher's exact test and Poisson regression models were used where appropriate, to investigate the association between hip scores, ethnicity, nationality, gender, handedness and age. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant association between the OHS and age (p<0.0001) and the HHS and age (p = 0.0006); demonstrating that as age increased, normal hip scores decreased. There was no statistically significant association between the HHS and gender (p = 0.1389); or HSS and nationality, adjusting for age (p = 0.5698) and adjusting for gender (p = 0.6997). There was no statistically significant association between the OHS and gender (p = 0.1350). Australians reported a statistically significant 4.2% higher overall OHS value compared to Canadians (p = 0.0490). There was no statistically significant association between the OHS and nationality in age groups 18-79 years. Participants >80 years reported a statistically significant association between the OHS and nationality (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Studies using an electronic control group should consider differences in gender, age, ethnicity and nationality when using the HHS and OHS to assess patient outcomes. This study has established an electronic, normal control group for studies using the HHS and OHS. When using the OHS, the control group should be sourced from the same country of origin. When using the HHS, the control group should be sourced from a pre-established control group within a database, without necessarily being sourced from the same country of origin. SAGE Publications 2016-01-15 2017-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6380093/ /pubmed/27886359 http://dx.doi.org/10.5301/hipint.5000465 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
McLean, James M.
Cappelletto, Jacob
Clarnette, Jock
Hill, Catherine L.
Gill, Tiffany
Mandziak, Daniel
Leith, Jordan
Normal Population Reference Values for the Oxford and Harris Hip Scores – Electronic Data Collection and its Implications for Clinical Practice
title Normal Population Reference Values for the Oxford and Harris Hip Scores – Electronic Data Collection and its Implications for Clinical Practice
title_full Normal Population Reference Values for the Oxford and Harris Hip Scores – Electronic Data Collection and its Implications for Clinical Practice
title_fullStr Normal Population Reference Values for the Oxford and Harris Hip Scores – Electronic Data Collection and its Implications for Clinical Practice
title_full_unstemmed Normal Population Reference Values for the Oxford and Harris Hip Scores – Electronic Data Collection and its Implications for Clinical Practice
title_short Normal Population Reference Values for the Oxford and Harris Hip Scores – Electronic Data Collection and its Implications for Clinical Practice
title_sort normal population reference values for the oxford and harris hip scores – electronic data collection and its implications for clinical practice
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6380093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27886359
http://dx.doi.org/10.5301/hipint.5000465
work_keys_str_mv AT mcleanjamesm normalpopulationreferencevaluesfortheoxfordandharrishipscoreselectronicdatacollectionanditsimplicationsforclinicalpractice
AT cappellettojacob normalpopulationreferencevaluesfortheoxfordandharrishipscoreselectronicdatacollectionanditsimplicationsforclinicalpractice
AT clarnettejock normalpopulationreferencevaluesfortheoxfordandharrishipscoreselectronicdatacollectionanditsimplicationsforclinicalpractice
AT hillcatherinel normalpopulationreferencevaluesfortheoxfordandharrishipscoreselectronicdatacollectionanditsimplicationsforclinicalpractice
AT gilltiffany normalpopulationreferencevaluesfortheoxfordandharrishipscoreselectronicdatacollectionanditsimplicationsforclinicalpractice
AT mandziakdaniel normalpopulationreferencevaluesfortheoxfordandharrishipscoreselectronicdatacollectionanditsimplicationsforclinicalpractice
AT leithjordan normalpopulationreferencevaluesfortheoxfordandharrishipscoreselectronicdatacollectionanditsimplicationsforclinicalpractice