Cargando…

Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Preoperative T Staging of Gastric Cancer: A Comparison With Endoscopic Ultrasonography

Objective: To compare the precision of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCEUS) to endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in preoperative T staging of gastric cancers. Methods: This retrospective study consisted of 158 pathologically confirmed gastric cancer patients. All patients underwent DCEUS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Liang, Liu, Zhe, Kou, Hongju, He, Huiliao, Zheng, Bo, Zhou, Lingling, Yang, Yan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6380108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30809510
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00066
_version_ 1783396255888572416
author Wang, Liang
Liu, Zhe
Kou, Hongju
He, Huiliao
Zheng, Bo
Zhou, Lingling
Yang, Yan
author_facet Wang, Liang
Liu, Zhe
Kou, Hongju
He, Huiliao
Zheng, Bo
Zhou, Lingling
Yang, Yan
author_sort Wang, Liang
collection PubMed
description Objective: To compare the precision of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCEUS) to endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in preoperative T staging of gastric cancers. Methods: This retrospective study consisted of 158 pathologically confirmed gastric cancer patients. All patients underwent DCEUS (intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasonography combined with oral contrast-enhanced ultrasonography) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) preoperatively. The histopathological findings of resected specimens were compared with the results of DCEUS and EUS retrospectively. Results: The accuracy of DCEUS and EUS in evaluating the T staging of gastric cancer were 82.3% (T1 62.5%,T2 84.4%,T3 87.9%,T4 91.3%) and 76.6% (T1 84.4%,T2 82.2%,T3 72.4%,T4 65.2%), respectively. There were no significant differences between the methods for the overall T staging accuracy (χ(2) = 1.569, P = 0.210). But EUS was superior to DCEUS for T1 stage (χ(2) = 3.925, P = 0.048) and DCEUS was superior to EUS for T3 stage (χ(2) = 4.393, P = 0.036) and T4 stage (χ(2) = 4.600, P = 0.032). Conclusion: DCEUS is a convenient and noninvasive method with high precision, which can be used as the primary imaging technique for advanced gastric cancer T staging. In early gastric cancer, we should prefer EUS. Two methods are complementary for assessing tumor invasion depth of gastric cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6380108
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63801082019-02-26 Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Preoperative T Staging of Gastric Cancer: A Comparison With Endoscopic Ultrasonography Wang, Liang Liu, Zhe Kou, Hongju He, Huiliao Zheng, Bo Zhou, Lingling Yang, Yan Front Oncol Oncology Objective: To compare the precision of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCEUS) to endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in preoperative T staging of gastric cancers. Methods: This retrospective study consisted of 158 pathologically confirmed gastric cancer patients. All patients underwent DCEUS (intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasonography combined with oral contrast-enhanced ultrasonography) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) preoperatively. The histopathological findings of resected specimens were compared with the results of DCEUS and EUS retrospectively. Results: The accuracy of DCEUS and EUS in evaluating the T staging of gastric cancer were 82.3% (T1 62.5%,T2 84.4%,T3 87.9%,T4 91.3%) and 76.6% (T1 84.4%,T2 82.2%,T3 72.4%,T4 65.2%), respectively. There were no significant differences between the methods for the overall T staging accuracy (χ(2) = 1.569, P = 0.210). But EUS was superior to DCEUS for T1 stage (χ(2) = 3.925, P = 0.048) and DCEUS was superior to EUS for T3 stage (χ(2) = 4.393, P = 0.036) and T4 stage (χ(2) = 4.600, P = 0.032). Conclusion: DCEUS is a convenient and noninvasive method with high precision, which can be used as the primary imaging technique for advanced gastric cancer T staging. In early gastric cancer, we should prefer EUS. Two methods are complementary for assessing tumor invasion depth of gastric cancer. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6380108/ /pubmed/30809510 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00066 Text en Copyright © 2019 Wang, Liu, Kou, He, Zheng, Zhou and Yang. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Wang, Liang
Liu, Zhe
Kou, Hongju
He, Huiliao
Zheng, Bo
Zhou, Lingling
Yang, Yan
Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Preoperative T Staging of Gastric Cancer: A Comparison With Endoscopic Ultrasonography
title Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Preoperative T Staging of Gastric Cancer: A Comparison With Endoscopic Ultrasonography
title_full Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Preoperative T Staging of Gastric Cancer: A Comparison With Endoscopic Ultrasonography
title_fullStr Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Preoperative T Staging of Gastric Cancer: A Comparison With Endoscopic Ultrasonography
title_full_unstemmed Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Preoperative T Staging of Gastric Cancer: A Comparison With Endoscopic Ultrasonography
title_short Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Preoperative T Staging of Gastric Cancer: A Comparison With Endoscopic Ultrasonography
title_sort double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in preoperative t staging of gastric cancer: a comparison with endoscopic ultrasonography
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6380108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30809510
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00066
work_keys_str_mv AT wangliang doublecontrastenhancedultrasonographyinpreoperativetstagingofgastriccanceracomparisonwithendoscopicultrasonography
AT liuzhe doublecontrastenhancedultrasonographyinpreoperativetstagingofgastriccanceracomparisonwithendoscopicultrasonography
AT kouhongju doublecontrastenhancedultrasonographyinpreoperativetstagingofgastriccanceracomparisonwithendoscopicultrasonography
AT hehuiliao doublecontrastenhancedultrasonographyinpreoperativetstagingofgastriccanceracomparisonwithendoscopicultrasonography
AT zhengbo doublecontrastenhancedultrasonographyinpreoperativetstagingofgastriccanceracomparisonwithendoscopicultrasonography
AT zhoulingling doublecontrastenhancedultrasonographyinpreoperativetstagingofgastriccanceracomparisonwithendoscopicultrasonography
AT yangyan doublecontrastenhancedultrasonographyinpreoperativetstagingofgastriccanceracomparisonwithendoscopicultrasonography