Cargando…

Preoperative prognostic factors for macular hole surgery: Which is better?

AIM: This study aims to evaluate the prognostic factors of different optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters as well as the tamponade used in surgery, on postoperative anatomical and functional success. METHODS: Twenty-nine eyes of 27 patients were included in this study. A three-port 23-gauge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Unsal, Erkan, Cubuk, Mehmet Ozgur, Ciftci, Furkan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6380157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30787530
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ojo.OJO_247_2017
_version_ 1783396268113920000
author Unsal, Erkan
Cubuk, Mehmet Ozgur
Ciftci, Furkan
author_facet Unsal, Erkan
Cubuk, Mehmet Ozgur
Ciftci, Furkan
author_sort Unsal, Erkan
collection PubMed
description AIM: This study aims to evaluate the prognostic factors of different optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters as well as the tamponade used in surgery, on postoperative anatomical and functional success. METHODS: Twenty-nine eyes of 27 patients were included in this study. A three-port 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy was performed on all eyes with peeling of the internal limiting membrane by visualization with brilliant blue dye by the same surgeon (E.U). Apical diameter (AD), base diameter (BD), and height (H) were manually measured by the same retina specialist (E.U) with using the software on OCT machine. Macular hole index (MHI), tractional hole index, diameter hole index, and macular hole volume (MHV) were calculated. The correlation between predictive factors and postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was evaluated. RESULTS: A statistically significant positive correlation was observed between preoperative BCVA, AD, BD, MHV, and postoperative BCVA scores. A statistically significant negative correlation was observed between preoperative MHI and postoperative BCVA scores (r = −0.676, P = 0.001). The strongest positive correlation was between BD and postoperative BCVA (logMAR) (r = 0.732, P = 0.001). The visual improvement was statistically better in patients treated with C3F8 than SF6. CONCLUSION: BD and MHV could be used as a strong predictive OCT parameters of postoperative functional success.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6380157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63801572019-02-20 Preoperative prognostic factors for macular hole surgery: Which is better? Unsal, Erkan Cubuk, Mehmet Ozgur Ciftci, Furkan Oman J Ophthalmol Original Article AIM: This study aims to evaluate the prognostic factors of different optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters as well as the tamponade used in surgery, on postoperative anatomical and functional success. METHODS: Twenty-nine eyes of 27 patients were included in this study. A three-port 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy was performed on all eyes with peeling of the internal limiting membrane by visualization with brilliant blue dye by the same surgeon (E.U). Apical diameter (AD), base diameter (BD), and height (H) were manually measured by the same retina specialist (E.U) with using the software on OCT machine. Macular hole index (MHI), tractional hole index, diameter hole index, and macular hole volume (MHV) were calculated. The correlation between predictive factors and postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was evaluated. RESULTS: A statistically significant positive correlation was observed between preoperative BCVA, AD, BD, MHV, and postoperative BCVA scores. A statistically significant negative correlation was observed between preoperative MHI and postoperative BCVA scores (r = −0.676, P = 0.001). The strongest positive correlation was between BD and postoperative BCVA (logMAR) (r = 0.732, P = 0.001). The visual improvement was statistically better in patients treated with C3F8 than SF6. CONCLUSION: BD and MHV could be used as a strong predictive OCT parameters of postoperative functional success. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6380157/ /pubmed/30787530 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ojo.OJO_247_2017 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Oman Ophthalmic Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Unsal, Erkan
Cubuk, Mehmet Ozgur
Ciftci, Furkan
Preoperative prognostic factors for macular hole surgery: Which is better?
title Preoperative prognostic factors for macular hole surgery: Which is better?
title_full Preoperative prognostic factors for macular hole surgery: Which is better?
title_fullStr Preoperative prognostic factors for macular hole surgery: Which is better?
title_full_unstemmed Preoperative prognostic factors for macular hole surgery: Which is better?
title_short Preoperative prognostic factors for macular hole surgery: Which is better?
title_sort preoperative prognostic factors for macular hole surgery: which is better?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6380157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30787530
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ojo.OJO_247_2017
work_keys_str_mv AT unsalerkan preoperativeprognosticfactorsformacularholesurgerywhichisbetter
AT cubukmehmetozgur preoperativeprognosticfactorsformacularholesurgerywhichisbetter
AT ciftcifurkan preoperativeprognosticfactorsformacularholesurgerywhichisbetter