Cargando…

Central corneal thickness measurement using ultrasonic pachymeter, optical coherence tomography, and TMS-5 topographer

AIM: This study aimed to compare the central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) and TMS-5 topographer with that taken with the gold standard digital Ultrasonic pachymeter (USP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 61 subjects (122 eyes) were prospectively and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Binnawi, Kamal Hashim, Elzubeir, Hanaa, Osman, Eman, Abdu, Malaz, Abdu, Mustafa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6380158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30787529
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ojo.OJO_96_2018
_version_ 1783396268354043904
author Binnawi, Kamal Hashim
Elzubeir, Hanaa
Osman, Eman
Abdu, Malaz
Abdu, Mustafa
author_facet Binnawi, Kamal Hashim
Elzubeir, Hanaa
Osman, Eman
Abdu, Malaz
Abdu, Mustafa
author_sort Binnawi, Kamal Hashim
collection PubMed
description AIM: This study aimed to compare the central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) and TMS-5 topographer with that taken with the gold standard digital Ultrasonic pachymeter (USP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 61 subjects (122 eyes) were prospectively and consecutively studied in a period from June 2016 to June 2017 at Sudan Eye Centre (SEC), Khartoum, Sudan. Besides the visual and refractive data, measurements of CCT were taken using OCT, TMS-5 and USP. Data analyzed using SPSS software for windows (IBM SPSS 20, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). RESULTS: A statistically significant differences in mean CCT was detected between the three instruments (P < 0.001). USP was found to measure the CCT 29μm thicker than OCT and 22μm thicker than TMS-5 topographer. A significant difference was also found between OCT and TMS-5. OCT found to give the lower values of CCT compared to both USP and TMS-5 topographer. Further analysis showed that the three procedures were significantly and strongly correlated to each other (USP vs OCT, r = 0.77), (USP vs TMS-5, r = 0.78) and (OCT vs TMS-5, r = 0.80). CONCLUSION: Mean central corneal thicknesses (CCT) were comparable among OCT, TMS-5 topographer and the gold standard USP. However, there is a reproducible systematic difference between CCT measurements taken with the three devices. It is important to note in clinical practice, that measurements acquired by these three modalities are not directly interchangeable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6380158
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63801582019-02-20 Central corneal thickness measurement using ultrasonic pachymeter, optical coherence tomography, and TMS-5 topographer Binnawi, Kamal Hashim Elzubeir, Hanaa Osman, Eman Abdu, Malaz Abdu, Mustafa Oman J Ophthalmol Original Article AIM: This study aimed to compare the central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) and TMS-5 topographer with that taken with the gold standard digital Ultrasonic pachymeter (USP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 61 subjects (122 eyes) were prospectively and consecutively studied in a period from June 2016 to June 2017 at Sudan Eye Centre (SEC), Khartoum, Sudan. Besides the visual and refractive data, measurements of CCT were taken using OCT, TMS-5 and USP. Data analyzed using SPSS software for windows (IBM SPSS 20, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). RESULTS: A statistically significant differences in mean CCT was detected between the three instruments (P < 0.001). USP was found to measure the CCT 29μm thicker than OCT and 22μm thicker than TMS-5 topographer. A significant difference was also found between OCT and TMS-5. OCT found to give the lower values of CCT compared to both USP and TMS-5 topographer. Further analysis showed that the three procedures were significantly and strongly correlated to each other (USP vs OCT, r = 0.77), (USP vs TMS-5, r = 0.78) and (OCT vs TMS-5, r = 0.80). CONCLUSION: Mean central corneal thicknesses (CCT) were comparable among OCT, TMS-5 topographer and the gold standard USP. However, there is a reproducible systematic difference between CCT measurements taken with the three devices. It is important to note in clinical practice, that measurements acquired by these three modalities are not directly interchangeable. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6380158/ /pubmed/30787529 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ojo.OJO_96_2018 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Oman Ophthalmic Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Binnawi, Kamal Hashim
Elzubeir, Hanaa
Osman, Eman
Abdu, Malaz
Abdu, Mustafa
Central corneal thickness measurement using ultrasonic pachymeter, optical coherence tomography, and TMS-5 topographer
title Central corneal thickness measurement using ultrasonic pachymeter, optical coherence tomography, and TMS-5 topographer
title_full Central corneal thickness measurement using ultrasonic pachymeter, optical coherence tomography, and TMS-5 topographer
title_fullStr Central corneal thickness measurement using ultrasonic pachymeter, optical coherence tomography, and TMS-5 topographer
title_full_unstemmed Central corneal thickness measurement using ultrasonic pachymeter, optical coherence tomography, and TMS-5 topographer
title_short Central corneal thickness measurement using ultrasonic pachymeter, optical coherence tomography, and TMS-5 topographer
title_sort central corneal thickness measurement using ultrasonic pachymeter, optical coherence tomography, and tms-5 topographer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6380158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30787529
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ojo.OJO_96_2018
work_keys_str_mv AT binnawikamalhashim centralcornealthicknessmeasurementusingultrasonicpachymeteropticalcoherencetomographyandtms5topographer
AT elzubeirhanaa centralcornealthicknessmeasurementusingultrasonicpachymeteropticalcoherencetomographyandtms5topographer
AT osmaneman centralcornealthicknessmeasurementusingultrasonicpachymeteropticalcoherencetomographyandtms5topographer
AT abdumalaz centralcornealthicknessmeasurementusingultrasonicpachymeteropticalcoherencetomographyandtms5topographer
AT abdumustafa centralcornealthicknessmeasurementusingultrasonicpachymeteropticalcoherencetomographyandtms5topographer