Cargando…

Selective attention in rat visual category learning

A prominent theory of category learning, COVIS, posits that new categories are learned with either a declarative or procedural system, depending on the task. The declarative system uses the prefrontal cortex (PFC) to learn rule-based (RB) category tasks in which there is one relevant sensory dimensi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Broschard, Matthew B., Kim, Jangjin, Love, Bradley C., Wasserman, Edward A., Freeman, John H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6380202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30770465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.048942.118
_version_ 1783396274297372672
author Broschard, Matthew B.
Kim, Jangjin
Love, Bradley C.
Wasserman, Edward A.
Freeman, John H.
author_facet Broschard, Matthew B.
Kim, Jangjin
Love, Bradley C.
Wasserman, Edward A.
Freeman, John H.
author_sort Broschard, Matthew B.
collection PubMed
description A prominent theory of category learning, COVIS, posits that new categories are learned with either a declarative or procedural system, depending on the task. The declarative system uses the prefrontal cortex (PFC) to learn rule-based (RB) category tasks in which there is one relevant sensory dimension that can be used to establish a rule for solving the task, whereas the procedural system uses corticostriatal circuits for information integration (II) tasks in which there are multiple relevant dimensions, precluding use of explicit rules. Previous studies have found faster learning of RB versus II tasks in humans and monkeys but not in pigeons. The absence of a learning rate difference in pigeons has been attributed to their lacking a PFC. A major gap in this comparative analysis, however, is the lack of data from a nonprimate mammalian species, such as rats, that have a PFC but a less differentiated PFC than primates. Here, we investigated RB and II category learning in rats. Similar to pigeons, RB and II tasks were learned at the same rate. After reaching a learning criterion, wider distributions of stimuli were presented to examine generalization. A second experiment found equivalent RB and II learning with wider category distributions. Computational modeling revealed that rats extract and selectively attend to category-relevant information but do not consistently use rules to solve the RB task. These findings suggest rats are on a continuum of PFC function between birds and primates, with selective attention but limited ability to utilize rules relative to primates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6380202
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63802022019-03-09 Selective attention in rat visual category learning Broschard, Matthew B. Kim, Jangjin Love, Bradley C. Wasserman, Edward A. Freeman, John H. Learn Mem Research A prominent theory of category learning, COVIS, posits that new categories are learned with either a declarative or procedural system, depending on the task. The declarative system uses the prefrontal cortex (PFC) to learn rule-based (RB) category tasks in which there is one relevant sensory dimension that can be used to establish a rule for solving the task, whereas the procedural system uses corticostriatal circuits for information integration (II) tasks in which there are multiple relevant dimensions, precluding use of explicit rules. Previous studies have found faster learning of RB versus II tasks in humans and monkeys but not in pigeons. The absence of a learning rate difference in pigeons has been attributed to their lacking a PFC. A major gap in this comparative analysis, however, is the lack of data from a nonprimate mammalian species, such as rats, that have a PFC but a less differentiated PFC than primates. Here, we investigated RB and II category learning in rats. Similar to pigeons, RB and II tasks were learned at the same rate. After reaching a learning criterion, wider distributions of stimuli were presented to examine generalization. A second experiment found equivalent RB and II learning with wider category distributions. Computational modeling revealed that rats extract and selectively attend to category-relevant information but do not consistently use rules to solve the RB task. These findings suggest rats are on a continuum of PFC function between birds and primates, with selective attention but limited ability to utilize rules relative to primates. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2019-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6380202/ /pubmed/30770465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.048942.118 Text en © 2019 Broschard et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article, published in Learning & Memory, is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Broschard, Matthew B.
Kim, Jangjin
Love, Bradley C.
Wasserman, Edward A.
Freeman, John H.
Selective attention in rat visual category learning
title Selective attention in rat visual category learning
title_full Selective attention in rat visual category learning
title_fullStr Selective attention in rat visual category learning
title_full_unstemmed Selective attention in rat visual category learning
title_short Selective attention in rat visual category learning
title_sort selective attention in rat visual category learning
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6380202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30770465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.048942.118
work_keys_str_mv AT broschardmatthewb selectiveattentioninratvisualcategorylearning
AT kimjangjin selectiveattentioninratvisualcategorylearning
AT lovebradleyc selectiveattentioninratvisualcategorylearning
AT wassermanedwarda selectiveattentioninratvisualcategorylearning
AT freemanjohnh selectiveattentioninratvisualcategorylearning