Cargando…

Efficacy of liposomal amphotericin B and anidulafungin using an antifungal lock technique (ALT) for catheter-related Candida albicans and Candida glabrata infections in an experimental model

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were as follows. First, we sought to compare the in vitro susceptibility of liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) and anidulafungin on Candida albicans and Candida glabrata biofilms growing on silicone discs. Second, we sought to compare the activity of LAmB versus anidul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Basas, Jana, Palau, Marta, Gomis, Xavier, Almirante, Benito, Gavaldà, Joan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6380555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30779771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212426
_version_ 1783396316368338944
author Basas, Jana
Palau, Marta
Gomis, Xavier
Almirante, Benito
Gavaldà, Joan
author_facet Basas, Jana
Palau, Marta
Gomis, Xavier
Almirante, Benito
Gavaldà, Joan
author_sort Basas, Jana
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were as follows. First, we sought to compare the in vitro susceptibility of liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) and anidulafungin on Candida albicans and Candida glabrata biofilms growing on silicone discs. Second, we sought to compare the activity of LAmB versus anidulafungin for the treatment of experimental catheter-related C. albicans and C. glabrata infections with the antifungal lock technique in a rabbit model. METHODS: Two C. albicans and two C. glabrata clinical strains were used. The minimum biofilm eradication concentration for 90% eradication (MBEC(90)) values were determined after 48h of treatment with LAmB and anidulafungin. Confocal microscopy was used to visualize the morphology and viability of yeasts growing in biofilms. Central venous catheters were inserted into New Zealand rabbits, which were inoculated of each strain of C. albicans and C. glabrata. Then, catheters were treated for 48h with saline or with antifungal lock technique using either LAmB (5mg/mL) or anidulafungin (3.33mg/mL). RESULTS: In vitro: anidulafungin showed greater activity than LAmB against C. albicans and C. glabrata strains. For C. albicans: MBEC(90) of anidulafungin versus LAmB: CA176, 0.03 vs. 128 mg/L; CA180, 0.5 vs. 64 mg/L. For C. glabrata: MBEC(90) of anidulafungin versus LAmB: CG171, 0.5 vs. 64 mg/L; CG334, 2 vs. 32 mg/L. In vivo: for C. albicans species, LAmB and anidulafungin achieved significant reductions relative to growth control of log(10) cfu recovered from the catheter tips (CA176: 3.6±0.3 log(10) CFU, p≤0.0001; CA180: 3.8±0.1 log(10) CFU, p≤0.01). For C. glabrata, anidulafungin lock therapy achieved significant reductions relative to the other treatments (CG171: 4.8 log(10) CFU, p≤0.0001; CG334: 5.1 log(10) CFU, p≤0.0001) CONCLUSIONS: For the C. albicans strains, both LAmB and anidulafungin may be promising antifungal lock technique for long-term catheter-related infections; however, anidulafungin showed significantly higher activity than LAmB against the C. glabrata strains.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6380555
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63805552019-03-01 Efficacy of liposomal amphotericin B and anidulafungin using an antifungal lock technique (ALT) for catheter-related Candida albicans and Candida glabrata infections in an experimental model Basas, Jana Palau, Marta Gomis, Xavier Almirante, Benito Gavaldà, Joan PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were as follows. First, we sought to compare the in vitro susceptibility of liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) and anidulafungin on Candida albicans and Candida glabrata biofilms growing on silicone discs. Second, we sought to compare the activity of LAmB versus anidulafungin for the treatment of experimental catheter-related C. albicans and C. glabrata infections with the antifungal lock technique in a rabbit model. METHODS: Two C. albicans and two C. glabrata clinical strains were used. The minimum biofilm eradication concentration for 90% eradication (MBEC(90)) values were determined after 48h of treatment with LAmB and anidulafungin. Confocal microscopy was used to visualize the morphology and viability of yeasts growing in biofilms. Central venous catheters were inserted into New Zealand rabbits, which were inoculated of each strain of C. albicans and C. glabrata. Then, catheters were treated for 48h with saline or with antifungal lock technique using either LAmB (5mg/mL) or anidulafungin (3.33mg/mL). RESULTS: In vitro: anidulafungin showed greater activity than LAmB against C. albicans and C. glabrata strains. For C. albicans: MBEC(90) of anidulafungin versus LAmB: CA176, 0.03 vs. 128 mg/L; CA180, 0.5 vs. 64 mg/L. For C. glabrata: MBEC(90) of anidulafungin versus LAmB: CG171, 0.5 vs. 64 mg/L; CG334, 2 vs. 32 mg/L. In vivo: for C. albicans species, LAmB and anidulafungin achieved significant reductions relative to growth control of log(10) cfu recovered from the catheter tips (CA176: 3.6±0.3 log(10) CFU, p≤0.0001; CA180: 3.8±0.1 log(10) CFU, p≤0.01). For C. glabrata, anidulafungin lock therapy achieved significant reductions relative to the other treatments (CG171: 4.8 log(10) CFU, p≤0.0001; CG334: 5.1 log(10) CFU, p≤0.0001) CONCLUSIONS: For the C. albicans strains, both LAmB and anidulafungin may be promising antifungal lock technique for long-term catheter-related infections; however, anidulafungin showed significantly higher activity than LAmB against the C. glabrata strains. Public Library of Science 2019-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6380555/ /pubmed/30779771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212426 Text en © 2019 Basas et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Basas, Jana
Palau, Marta
Gomis, Xavier
Almirante, Benito
Gavaldà, Joan
Efficacy of liposomal amphotericin B and anidulafungin using an antifungal lock technique (ALT) for catheter-related Candida albicans and Candida glabrata infections in an experimental model
title Efficacy of liposomal amphotericin B and anidulafungin using an antifungal lock technique (ALT) for catheter-related Candida albicans and Candida glabrata infections in an experimental model
title_full Efficacy of liposomal amphotericin B and anidulafungin using an antifungal lock technique (ALT) for catheter-related Candida albicans and Candida glabrata infections in an experimental model
title_fullStr Efficacy of liposomal amphotericin B and anidulafungin using an antifungal lock technique (ALT) for catheter-related Candida albicans and Candida glabrata infections in an experimental model
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of liposomal amphotericin B and anidulafungin using an antifungal lock technique (ALT) for catheter-related Candida albicans and Candida glabrata infections in an experimental model
title_short Efficacy of liposomal amphotericin B and anidulafungin using an antifungal lock technique (ALT) for catheter-related Candida albicans and Candida glabrata infections in an experimental model
title_sort efficacy of liposomal amphotericin b and anidulafungin using an antifungal lock technique (alt) for catheter-related candida albicans and candida glabrata infections in an experimental model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6380555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30779771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212426
work_keys_str_mv AT basasjana efficacyofliposomalamphotericinbandanidulafunginusinganantifungallocktechniquealtforcatheterrelatedcandidaalbicansandcandidaglabratainfectionsinanexperimentalmodel
AT palaumarta efficacyofliposomalamphotericinbandanidulafunginusinganantifungallocktechniquealtforcatheterrelatedcandidaalbicansandcandidaglabratainfectionsinanexperimentalmodel
AT gomisxavier efficacyofliposomalamphotericinbandanidulafunginusinganantifungallocktechniquealtforcatheterrelatedcandidaalbicansandcandidaglabratainfectionsinanexperimentalmodel
AT almirantebenito efficacyofliposomalamphotericinbandanidulafunginusinganantifungallocktechniquealtforcatheterrelatedcandidaalbicansandcandidaglabratainfectionsinanexperimentalmodel
AT gavaldajoan efficacyofliposomalamphotericinbandanidulafunginusinganantifungallocktechniquealtforcatheterrelatedcandidaalbicansandcandidaglabratainfectionsinanexperimentalmodel