Cargando…
Comparative efficacy and safety of lipid-lowering agents in patients with hypercholesterolemia: A frequentist network meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The comparative efficacy and safety of PCSK9 inhibitors, statins, and ezetimibe to lower lipid levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia remain unknown. We aimed to investigate the benefits and harms of the lipid-lowering agents in these patients. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and the Coch...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6380691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30732185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014400 |
_version_ | 1783396337616683008 |
---|---|
author | Zhao, Zonglei Du, Song Shen, Shuxin Luo, Ping Ding, Shoukun Wang, Guanggong Wang, Lixia |
author_facet | Zhao, Zonglei Du, Song Shen, Shuxin Luo, Ping Ding, Shoukun Wang, Guanggong Wang, Lixia |
author_sort | Zhao, Zonglei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The comparative efficacy and safety of PCSK9 inhibitors, statins, and ezetimibe to lower lipid levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia remain unknown. We aimed to investigate the benefits and harms of the lipid-lowering agents in these patients. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from January 1, 2000 to June 1, 2018 for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Frequentist network meta-analysis was used to pool all estimates. Ranking probabilities were used to rank the comparative effects of all drugs against placebo. RESULTS: Eighty-four RCTs enrolled 246,706 patients were included. Most of the included were assessed as low risk of bias. The probabilities of PCSK9 inhibitors that ranked first in improving lipid outcomes were all 100%. The probability of statins that ranked first in reducing the risk of cardiovascular (CV) events was 60.6%, and the probability of PCSK9 inhibitor was 37.1%, while no significant difference of efficacy in reducing CV events was observed between the 2 agents (odds ratios [OR] 0.98, 95% CI 0.87–1.11). Statin ranked first in reducing all-cause and CV death. Compared with placebo, statins were associated with reduced risks of all-cause (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.85–0.96) and CV death (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.75–0.91) while PCSK9 inhibitors and ezetimibe were not. No agents caused adverse events (including neurocognitive events), except that statins therapy significantly increases the levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.42–2.51) and creatine kinase (CK) (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.09–1.93) and the incidence of diabetes (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02–1.26). CONCLUSIONS: PCSK9 inhibitors were the most effective lipid-lowering agents in improving lipid levels. Furthermore, PCSK9 inhibitors achieved similar CV benefits like statins, while PCSK9 inhibitors were not associated with any increased risk of statin-related side-effects. Thus, PCSK9 inhibitors may also be recommended as promisingly first-line lipid-lowering treatment for patients with hypercholesterolemia, especially for these with statins intolerance or resistance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6380691 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63806912019-03-04 Comparative efficacy and safety of lipid-lowering agents in patients with hypercholesterolemia: A frequentist network meta-analysis Zhao, Zonglei Du, Song Shen, Shuxin Luo, Ping Ding, Shoukun Wang, Guanggong Wang, Lixia Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article BACKGROUND: The comparative efficacy and safety of PCSK9 inhibitors, statins, and ezetimibe to lower lipid levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia remain unknown. We aimed to investigate the benefits and harms of the lipid-lowering agents in these patients. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from January 1, 2000 to June 1, 2018 for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Frequentist network meta-analysis was used to pool all estimates. Ranking probabilities were used to rank the comparative effects of all drugs against placebo. RESULTS: Eighty-four RCTs enrolled 246,706 patients were included. Most of the included were assessed as low risk of bias. The probabilities of PCSK9 inhibitors that ranked first in improving lipid outcomes were all 100%. The probability of statins that ranked first in reducing the risk of cardiovascular (CV) events was 60.6%, and the probability of PCSK9 inhibitor was 37.1%, while no significant difference of efficacy in reducing CV events was observed between the 2 agents (odds ratios [OR] 0.98, 95% CI 0.87–1.11). Statin ranked first in reducing all-cause and CV death. Compared with placebo, statins were associated with reduced risks of all-cause (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.85–0.96) and CV death (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.75–0.91) while PCSK9 inhibitors and ezetimibe were not. No agents caused adverse events (including neurocognitive events), except that statins therapy significantly increases the levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.42–2.51) and creatine kinase (CK) (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.09–1.93) and the incidence of diabetes (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02–1.26). CONCLUSIONS: PCSK9 inhibitors were the most effective lipid-lowering agents in improving lipid levels. Furthermore, PCSK9 inhibitors achieved similar CV benefits like statins, while PCSK9 inhibitors were not associated with any increased risk of statin-related side-effects. Thus, PCSK9 inhibitors may also be recommended as promisingly first-line lipid-lowering treatment for patients with hypercholesterolemia, especially for these with statins intolerance or resistance. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6380691/ /pubmed/30732185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014400 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhao, Zonglei Du, Song Shen, Shuxin Luo, Ping Ding, Shoukun Wang, Guanggong Wang, Lixia Comparative efficacy and safety of lipid-lowering agents in patients with hypercholesterolemia: A frequentist network meta-analysis |
title | Comparative efficacy and safety of lipid-lowering agents in patients with hypercholesterolemia: A frequentist network meta-analysis |
title_full | Comparative efficacy and safety of lipid-lowering agents in patients with hypercholesterolemia: A frequentist network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparative efficacy and safety of lipid-lowering agents in patients with hypercholesterolemia: A frequentist network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative efficacy and safety of lipid-lowering agents in patients with hypercholesterolemia: A frequentist network meta-analysis |
title_short | Comparative efficacy and safety of lipid-lowering agents in patients with hypercholesterolemia: A frequentist network meta-analysis |
title_sort | comparative efficacy and safety of lipid-lowering agents in patients with hypercholesterolemia: a frequentist network meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6380691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30732185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014400 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhaozonglei comparativeefficacyandsafetyoflipidloweringagentsinpatientswithhypercholesterolemiaafrequentistnetworkmetaanalysis AT dusong comparativeefficacyandsafetyoflipidloweringagentsinpatientswithhypercholesterolemiaafrequentistnetworkmetaanalysis AT shenshuxin comparativeefficacyandsafetyoflipidloweringagentsinpatientswithhypercholesterolemiaafrequentistnetworkmetaanalysis AT luoping comparativeefficacyandsafetyoflipidloweringagentsinpatientswithhypercholesterolemiaafrequentistnetworkmetaanalysis AT dingshoukun comparativeefficacyandsafetyoflipidloweringagentsinpatientswithhypercholesterolemiaafrequentistnetworkmetaanalysis AT wangguanggong comparativeefficacyandsafetyoflipidloweringagentsinpatientswithhypercholesterolemiaafrequentistnetworkmetaanalysis AT wanglixia comparativeefficacyandsafetyoflipidloweringagentsinpatientswithhypercholesterolemiaafrequentistnetworkmetaanalysis |