Cargando…

Comparing the effectiveness of three scoring systems in predicting adult patient outcomes in the emergency department

This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the rapid acute physiology score (RAPS), the rapid emergency medicine score (REMS), and the modified early warning score (MEWS) in predicting the outcomes of adult patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). A retrospective review was underta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wei, Xiaojun, Ma, Haoli, Liu, Ruining, Zhao, Yan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6380692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30702597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014289
_version_ 1783396337853661184
author Wei, Xiaojun
Ma, Haoli
Liu, Ruining
Zhao, Yan
author_facet Wei, Xiaojun
Ma, Haoli
Liu, Ruining
Zhao, Yan
author_sort Wei, Xiaojun
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the rapid acute physiology score (RAPS), the rapid emergency medicine score (REMS), and the modified early warning score (MEWS) in predicting the outcomes of adult patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). A retrospective review was undertaken between February 2014 and February 2018 in an adult ED of a 3300-bed university hospital. The RAPS, REMS, and MEWS were calculated to assess their capability to predict hospital admission, length of hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality, using area under receiver operating characteristic analysis. Multivariate analysis was used to identify variables that were independent predictors of the outcomes. We included 39,977 patients who had presented to the ED during 48 consecutive months, of whom 4857 were admitted and 213 died in hospital. The predictabilities of REMS, RAPS, and MEWS for hospital admission were 0.76, 0.59, and 0.55, respectively; the predictability of REMS, RAPS, and MEWS for hospital mortality were 0.88, 0.72, and 0.73, respectively; and the predictability of REMS, RAPS, and MEWS for length of hospital stay were 0.76, 0.67, and 0.65, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that the Glasgow coma scale (GCS) (odds ratio (OR), 1.61; P < .001), age (OR, 1.50; P < .001), and MAP (OR, 1.27; P < .001) were independent predictors for hospital admission; GCS (OR, 2.92; P < .001), respiratory rate (RR) (OR, 2.69; P < .001), peripheral oxygen saturation (OR, 2.67; P < .001), MAP (OR, 2.11; P < .001), age (OR, 1.75; P < .001), and pulse rate (PR) (OR, 1.73; P < .001) were independent predictors for in-hospital mortality; and RR (OR, 1.41; P < .001), temperature (OR, 1.05; P = .01), and PR (OR, 0.96; P = .04) were independent predictors for length of hospital stay. Our study evaluated and confirmed the REMS as a powerful predictor of ED adult patient outcomes, including hospital admission, length of hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality compared to RAPS and MEWS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6380692
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63806922019-03-04 Comparing the effectiveness of three scoring systems in predicting adult patient outcomes in the emergency department Wei, Xiaojun Ma, Haoli Liu, Ruining Zhao, Yan Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the rapid acute physiology score (RAPS), the rapid emergency medicine score (REMS), and the modified early warning score (MEWS) in predicting the outcomes of adult patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). A retrospective review was undertaken between February 2014 and February 2018 in an adult ED of a 3300-bed university hospital. The RAPS, REMS, and MEWS were calculated to assess their capability to predict hospital admission, length of hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality, using area under receiver operating characteristic analysis. Multivariate analysis was used to identify variables that were independent predictors of the outcomes. We included 39,977 patients who had presented to the ED during 48 consecutive months, of whom 4857 were admitted and 213 died in hospital. The predictabilities of REMS, RAPS, and MEWS for hospital admission were 0.76, 0.59, and 0.55, respectively; the predictability of REMS, RAPS, and MEWS for hospital mortality were 0.88, 0.72, and 0.73, respectively; and the predictability of REMS, RAPS, and MEWS for length of hospital stay were 0.76, 0.67, and 0.65, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that the Glasgow coma scale (GCS) (odds ratio (OR), 1.61; P < .001), age (OR, 1.50; P < .001), and MAP (OR, 1.27; P < .001) were independent predictors for hospital admission; GCS (OR, 2.92; P < .001), respiratory rate (RR) (OR, 2.69; P < .001), peripheral oxygen saturation (OR, 2.67; P < .001), MAP (OR, 2.11; P < .001), age (OR, 1.75; P < .001), and pulse rate (PR) (OR, 1.73; P < .001) were independent predictors for in-hospital mortality; and RR (OR, 1.41; P < .001), temperature (OR, 1.05; P = .01), and PR (OR, 0.96; P = .04) were independent predictors for length of hospital stay. Our study evaluated and confirmed the REMS as a powerful predictor of ED adult patient outcomes, including hospital admission, length of hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality compared to RAPS and MEWS. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6380692/ /pubmed/30702597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014289 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Wei, Xiaojun
Ma, Haoli
Liu, Ruining
Zhao, Yan
Comparing the effectiveness of three scoring systems in predicting adult patient outcomes in the emergency department
title Comparing the effectiveness of three scoring systems in predicting adult patient outcomes in the emergency department
title_full Comparing the effectiveness of three scoring systems in predicting adult patient outcomes in the emergency department
title_fullStr Comparing the effectiveness of three scoring systems in predicting adult patient outcomes in the emergency department
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the effectiveness of three scoring systems in predicting adult patient outcomes in the emergency department
title_short Comparing the effectiveness of three scoring systems in predicting adult patient outcomes in the emergency department
title_sort comparing the effectiveness of three scoring systems in predicting adult patient outcomes in the emergency department
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6380692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30702597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014289
work_keys_str_mv AT weixiaojun comparingtheeffectivenessofthreescoringsystemsinpredictingadultpatientoutcomesintheemergencydepartment
AT mahaoli comparingtheeffectivenessofthreescoringsystemsinpredictingadultpatientoutcomesintheemergencydepartment
AT liuruining comparingtheeffectivenessofthreescoringsystemsinpredictingadultpatientoutcomesintheemergencydepartment
AT zhaoyan comparingtheeffectivenessofthreescoringsystemsinpredictingadultpatientoutcomesintheemergencydepartment