Cargando…

Does pre-scanning training improve the image quality of children receiving magnetic resonance imaging?: A meta-analysis of current studies

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often used in children for its clear display of body parts. But it is usually hard to acquire high-quality images, for the uncooperative ability of children. It is believed that pre-MRI training could ensure the high quality of images. The current meta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Jie, Li, Qiancheng, Dai, Xiuhong, Li, Jiong, Zhang, Xinxian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6380694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30702613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014323
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often used in children for its clear display of body parts. But it is usually hard to acquire high-quality images, for the uncooperative ability of children. It is believed that pre-MRI training could ensure the high quality of images. The current meta-analysis was done to analyze the current evidences in this field. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched up to July 2018, for studies assessing the effects of training on pediatric MRI. Data, including image quality, failed scanning rate, and sedation use, were extracted and analyzed using Revman 5.2 software. RESULTS: There were 5 studies with 379 subjects in the meta-analysis. Training and control groups were quite comparable when accepted image quality was reviewed (P = .30), but a lower rate of excellent image quality was found in subjects with training (P = .02). The pooling results found no significance between training and control group in sedation use (P = .09) and successful MRI scanning (P = .63). CONCLUSIONS: It is cautious to conclude that pre-MRI training does not improve the image quality and reduce sedation use among children, for the limited number of studies and sample size. More trials should be encouraged to demonstrate this issue.