Cargando…

Comparison of Ivor-Lewis versus Sweet procedure for middle and lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A STROBE compliant study

Our study compared the Ivor-Lewis and Sweet procedures used for treating middle and lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and assessed the associated perioperative complications and long-term survival rates of the patients. This retrospective study involved 624 middle and lower thoracic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Jun, Wei, Ning, Jiang, Nanqing, Lu, Yiming, Zhang, Xiaoying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6380795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30732195
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014416
_version_ 1783396363533287424
author Wang, Jun
Wei, Ning
Jiang, Nanqing
Lu, Yiming
Zhang, Xiaoying
author_facet Wang, Jun
Wei, Ning
Jiang, Nanqing
Lu, Yiming
Zhang, Xiaoying
author_sort Wang, Jun
collection PubMed
description Our study compared the Ivor-Lewis and Sweet procedures used for treating middle and lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and assessed the associated perioperative complications and long-term survival rates of the patients. This retrospective study involved 624 middle and lower thoracic esophageal squamous carcinoma patients who received either Ivor-Lewis (n = 325) or Sweet (n = 299) procedures at our hospital. Further, the perioperative conditions and long-term survival rates were analyzed for both groups. Relative to the Sweet group, the Ivor-Lewis group showed lower volume of drainage within 24 hours after operation (400 (300–500) ml vs 550 (400–658) ml, P = .031). Although we found no significant differences in major postoperative complications between the groups (72 (22.2) vs 65 (21.7), P = .90), there were significant differences observed in minor postoperative complications between the Ivor-Lewis and Sweet groups (59 (18.2) vs 32 (10.7), P = .008). Perioperative death rates remained comparable for the 2 groups (2 (0.6) vs 2 (0.7), P > .99). Further, comparison of the 2 groups revealed that the Ivor-Lewis group had increased number of dissected lymph nodes, (20 (4–42) vs 16 (3–31), P < .001), especially in the upper mediastinum (4 (0–5) vs 2 (0–2), P < .001). The long-term survival rates did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (Kaplan-Meier method, P = .95; Cox regression, P = .20). These findings suggest that perioperative complications and long-term survival rates were comparable for both patients groups. Patients receiving the Sweet procedure had reduced minor postoperative complications compared to those receiving the Ivor-Lewis procedure. Due to improved quality of lymph node dissection in the upper mediastinum, the Ivor-Lewis procedure may have advantages over the Sweet procedure for treating patients with esophageal cancer with enlarged lymph nodes in the upper mediastinum.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6380795
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63807952019-03-04 Comparison of Ivor-Lewis versus Sweet procedure for middle and lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A STROBE compliant study Wang, Jun Wei, Ning Jiang, Nanqing Lu, Yiming Zhang, Xiaoying Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article Our study compared the Ivor-Lewis and Sweet procedures used for treating middle and lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and assessed the associated perioperative complications and long-term survival rates of the patients. This retrospective study involved 624 middle and lower thoracic esophageal squamous carcinoma patients who received either Ivor-Lewis (n = 325) or Sweet (n = 299) procedures at our hospital. Further, the perioperative conditions and long-term survival rates were analyzed for both groups. Relative to the Sweet group, the Ivor-Lewis group showed lower volume of drainage within 24 hours after operation (400 (300–500) ml vs 550 (400–658) ml, P = .031). Although we found no significant differences in major postoperative complications between the groups (72 (22.2) vs 65 (21.7), P = .90), there were significant differences observed in minor postoperative complications between the Ivor-Lewis and Sweet groups (59 (18.2) vs 32 (10.7), P = .008). Perioperative death rates remained comparable for the 2 groups (2 (0.6) vs 2 (0.7), P > .99). Further, comparison of the 2 groups revealed that the Ivor-Lewis group had increased number of dissected lymph nodes, (20 (4–42) vs 16 (3–31), P < .001), especially in the upper mediastinum (4 (0–5) vs 2 (0–2), P < .001). The long-term survival rates did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (Kaplan-Meier method, P = .95; Cox regression, P = .20). These findings suggest that perioperative complications and long-term survival rates were comparable for both patients groups. Patients receiving the Sweet procedure had reduced minor postoperative complications compared to those receiving the Ivor-Lewis procedure. Due to improved quality of lymph node dissection in the upper mediastinum, the Ivor-Lewis procedure may have advantages over the Sweet procedure for treating patients with esophageal cancer with enlarged lymph nodes in the upper mediastinum. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6380795/ /pubmed/30732195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014416 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Jun
Wei, Ning
Jiang, Nanqing
Lu, Yiming
Zhang, Xiaoying
Comparison of Ivor-Lewis versus Sweet procedure for middle and lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A STROBE compliant study
title Comparison of Ivor-Lewis versus Sweet procedure for middle and lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A STROBE compliant study
title_full Comparison of Ivor-Lewis versus Sweet procedure for middle and lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A STROBE compliant study
title_fullStr Comparison of Ivor-Lewis versus Sweet procedure for middle and lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A STROBE compliant study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Ivor-Lewis versus Sweet procedure for middle and lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A STROBE compliant study
title_short Comparison of Ivor-Lewis versus Sweet procedure for middle and lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A STROBE compliant study
title_sort comparison of ivor-lewis versus sweet procedure for middle and lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a strobe compliant study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6380795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30732195
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014416
work_keys_str_mv AT wangjun comparisonofivorlewisversussweetprocedureformiddleandlowerthoracicesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaastrobecompliantstudy
AT weining comparisonofivorlewisversussweetprocedureformiddleandlowerthoracicesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaastrobecompliantstudy
AT jiangnanqing comparisonofivorlewisversussweetprocedureformiddleandlowerthoracicesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaastrobecompliantstudy
AT luyiming comparisonofivorlewisversussweetprocedureformiddleandlowerthoracicesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaastrobecompliantstudy
AT zhangxiaoying comparisonofivorlewisversussweetprocedureformiddleandlowerthoracicesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaastrobecompliantstudy