Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of norepinephrine versus phenylephrine for the management of maternal hypotension during cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Phenylephrine is the current “gold standard" vasopressor used to treat maternal hypotension in women undergoing cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia. Since 2015, various studies have explored the use of norepinephrine to manage maternal hypotension. We conducted this systematic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Shiqin, Shen, Xiaofeng, Liu, Shijiang, Yang, Jianjun, Wang, Xian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6380847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30702617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014331
_version_ 1783396376509415424
author Xu, Shiqin
Shen, Xiaofeng
Liu, Shijiang
Yang, Jianjun
Wang, Xian
author_facet Xu, Shiqin
Shen, Xiaofeng
Liu, Shijiang
Yang, Jianjun
Wang, Xian
author_sort Xu, Shiqin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Phenylephrine is the current “gold standard" vasopressor used to treat maternal hypotension in women undergoing cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia. Since 2015, various studies have explored the use of norepinephrine to manage maternal hypotension. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the efficacy and safety of norepinephrine and phenylephrine for the prevention and treatment of maternal hypotension. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using electronic databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase (Embase.com), and the Cochrane CENTRAL register of controlled trials. Parturients underwent cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia and received norepinephrine to prevent or treat hypotension were considered. Maternal outcomes, including incidences of hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, intraoperative nausea and vomiting (IONV), maternal cardiac output (CO), and blood pressure (BP) control precision, as well as neonatal Apgar scores and umbilical cord blood analyses, were compared between groups. RESULTS: Three RCTs in 4 reports published between 2015 and 2018 were finally identified with a total of 294 parturients. We found there was no difference in effectiveness between norepinephrine and phenylephrine for the treatment of maternal hypotension (odds ratio [OR] 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37–1.10, P = .11), and there was no difference in the occurrence of hypertension (OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.33–1.62, P = .45). Of note, compared to the phenylephrine group, parturients in the norepinephrine group were less likely to experience bradycardia (OR 0.29; 95% CI 0.12–0.68, P = .005) and IONV (OR 0.54; 95% CI, 0.29–0.99, P = .04). Further, we did not observe a difference between the two vasopressors in the incidence of neonatal Apgar scores < 7 at 1  and 5 minutes or in umbilical vein (UV) blood gas. However, evidence is insufficient to draw conclusions regarding the greater maternal CO and better BP control precision with the use of norepinephrine. CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis shows norepinephrine provides similar efficacy to manage maternal hypotension compared to phenylephrine; additionally, showing advantage regarding certain side effects like bradycardia and IONV reduction. Accordingly, norepinephrine is a promising alternative to phenylephrine. However, before routine clinical application, more studies are warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6380847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63808472019-03-11 Efficacy and safety of norepinephrine versus phenylephrine for the management of maternal hypotension during cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis Xu, Shiqin Shen, Xiaofeng Liu, Shijiang Yang, Jianjun Wang, Xian Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article BACKGROUND: Phenylephrine is the current “gold standard" vasopressor used to treat maternal hypotension in women undergoing cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia. Since 2015, various studies have explored the use of norepinephrine to manage maternal hypotension. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the efficacy and safety of norepinephrine and phenylephrine for the prevention and treatment of maternal hypotension. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using electronic databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase (Embase.com), and the Cochrane CENTRAL register of controlled trials. Parturients underwent cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia and received norepinephrine to prevent or treat hypotension were considered. Maternal outcomes, including incidences of hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, intraoperative nausea and vomiting (IONV), maternal cardiac output (CO), and blood pressure (BP) control precision, as well as neonatal Apgar scores and umbilical cord blood analyses, were compared between groups. RESULTS: Three RCTs in 4 reports published between 2015 and 2018 were finally identified with a total of 294 parturients. We found there was no difference in effectiveness between norepinephrine and phenylephrine for the treatment of maternal hypotension (odds ratio [OR] 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37–1.10, P = .11), and there was no difference in the occurrence of hypertension (OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.33–1.62, P = .45). Of note, compared to the phenylephrine group, parturients in the norepinephrine group were less likely to experience bradycardia (OR 0.29; 95% CI 0.12–0.68, P = .005) and IONV (OR 0.54; 95% CI, 0.29–0.99, P = .04). Further, we did not observe a difference between the two vasopressors in the incidence of neonatal Apgar scores < 7 at 1  and 5 minutes or in umbilical vein (UV) blood gas. However, evidence is insufficient to draw conclusions regarding the greater maternal CO and better BP control precision with the use of norepinephrine. CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis shows norepinephrine provides similar efficacy to manage maternal hypotension compared to phenylephrine; additionally, showing advantage regarding certain side effects like bradycardia and IONV reduction. Accordingly, norepinephrine is a promising alternative to phenylephrine. However, before routine clinical application, more studies are warranted. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6380847/ /pubmed/30702617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014331 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Xu, Shiqin
Shen, Xiaofeng
Liu, Shijiang
Yang, Jianjun
Wang, Xian
Efficacy and safety of norepinephrine versus phenylephrine for the management of maternal hypotension during cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Efficacy and safety of norepinephrine versus phenylephrine for the management of maternal hypotension during cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy and safety of norepinephrine versus phenylephrine for the management of maternal hypotension during cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of norepinephrine versus phenylephrine for the management of maternal hypotension during cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of norepinephrine versus phenylephrine for the management of maternal hypotension during cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy and safety of norepinephrine versus phenylephrine for the management of maternal hypotension during cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of norepinephrine versus phenylephrine for the management of maternal hypotension during cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6380847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30702617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014331
work_keys_str_mv AT xushiqin efficacyandsafetyofnorepinephrineversusphenylephrineforthemanagementofmaternalhypotensionduringcesareandeliverywithspinalanesthesiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shenxiaofeng efficacyandsafetyofnorepinephrineversusphenylephrineforthemanagementofmaternalhypotensionduringcesareandeliverywithspinalanesthesiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liushijiang efficacyandsafetyofnorepinephrineversusphenylephrineforthemanagementofmaternalhypotensionduringcesareandeliverywithspinalanesthesiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yangjianjun efficacyandsafetyofnorepinephrineversusphenylephrineforthemanagementofmaternalhypotensionduringcesareandeliverywithspinalanesthesiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangxian efficacyandsafetyofnorepinephrineversusphenylephrineforthemanagementofmaternalhypotensionduringcesareandeliverywithspinalanesthesiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis