Cargando…

Cone beam versus conventional computed tomography angiography volume measurement in partial splenic embolization

When performing partial splenic arterial embolization (PSE), it can be difficult to determine the embolization ratio based on 2-dimensional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) image diagnosis alone. Therefore, at our department, we conduct computed tomography (CT) imaging intraoperatively and post...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ishikawa, Toru, Imai, Michitaka, Okoshi, Marina, Tomiyoshi, Kei, Kojima, Yuichi, Horigome, Ryoko, Nozawa, Yujiro, Sano, Tomoe, Iwanaga, Akito, Honma, Terasu, Yoshida, Toshiaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6380856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30702608
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014312
_version_ 1783396378922188800
author Ishikawa, Toru
Imai, Michitaka
Okoshi, Marina
Tomiyoshi, Kei
Kojima, Yuichi
Horigome, Ryoko
Nozawa, Yujiro
Sano, Tomoe
Iwanaga, Akito
Honma, Terasu
Yoshida, Toshiaki
author_facet Ishikawa, Toru
Imai, Michitaka
Okoshi, Marina
Tomiyoshi, Kei
Kojima, Yuichi
Horigome, Ryoko
Nozawa, Yujiro
Sano, Tomoe
Iwanaga, Akito
Honma, Terasu
Yoshida, Toshiaki
author_sort Ishikawa, Toru
collection PubMed
description When performing partial splenic arterial embolization (PSE), it can be difficult to determine the embolization ratio based on 2-dimensional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) image diagnosis alone. Therefore, at our department, we conduct computed tomography (CT) imaging intraoperatively and postoperatively to determine whether the planned embolization has been achieved. In recent years, developments in interventional radiology devices have enabled diagnostic imaging using cone beam CT. Here, we investigated whether the embolization ratio could be predicted from volume measurement with cone beam CT in PSE. We investigated correlations between volume measurement with conventional CT angiography (CTA) and volume measurement with cone beam CTA in 11 cases that underwent PSE with cone beam CT guidance (Allura Clarity FD20; Phillips, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) between December 2013 and May 2018. The mean subject age was 65.0 ± 5.8 years (6 men, 5 women). The subjects had underlying liver disorders of hepatitis C virus infection (4 cases), nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (4 cases), and alcohol-related disease (3 cases). A positive correlation was noted between conventional CTA and cone beam CTA, with infarction rates of 61.28 ± 9.31% and 64.04 ± 9.24%, respectively. The correlation coefficient between the 2 variables was .772. Because blood washout occurs rapidly in the spleen, contrast medium had to be continuously injected during imaging to enable dual-phase imaging with cone beam CT. However, we successfully performed imaging up to the second phase and volume measurement for the embolization ratio by inserting a catheter into the splenic artery and confirming the cone beam CT arrival time from the DSA images. The results were almost identical to those obtained from volume measurement with conventional CT based on CTA imaging. Thus, our results suggest that the splenic embolization ratio measurement obtained via cone beam CTA can be used to assess PSE treatment endpoints.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6380856
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63808562019-03-11 Cone beam versus conventional computed tomography angiography volume measurement in partial splenic embolization Ishikawa, Toru Imai, Michitaka Okoshi, Marina Tomiyoshi, Kei Kojima, Yuichi Horigome, Ryoko Nozawa, Yujiro Sano, Tomoe Iwanaga, Akito Honma, Terasu Yoshida, Toshiaki Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article When performing partial splenic arterial embolization (PSE), it can be difficult to determine the embolization ratio based on 2-dimensional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) image diagnosis alone. Therefore, at our department, we conduct computed tomography (CT) imaging intraoperatively and postoperatively to determine whether the planned embolization has been achieved. In recent years, developments in interventional radiology devices have enabled diagnostic imaging using cone beam CT. Here, we investigated whether the embolization ratio could be predicted from volume measurement with cone beam CT in PSE. We investigated correlations between volume measurement with conventional CT angiography (CTA) and volume measurement with cone beam CTA in 11 cases that underwent PSE with cone beam CT guidance (Allura Clarity FD20; Phillips, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) between December 2013 and May 2018. The mean subject age was 65.0 ± 5.8 years (6 men, 5 women). The subjects had underlying liver disorders of hepatitis C virus infection (4 cases), nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (4 cases), and alcohol-related disease (3 cases). A positive correlation was noted between conventional CTA and cone beam CTA, with infarction rates of 61.28 ± 9.31% and 64.04 ± 9.24%, respectively. The correlation coefficient between the 2 variables was .772. Because blood washout occurs rapidly in the spleen, contrast medium had to be continuously injected during imaging to enable dual-phase imaging with cone beam CT. However, we successfully performed imaging up to the second phase and volume measurement for the embolization ratio by inserting a catheter into the splenic artery and confirming the cone beam CT arrival time from the DSA images. The results were almost identical to those obtained from volume measurement with conventional CT based on CTA imaging. Thus, our results suggest that the splenic embolization ratio measurement obtained via cone beam CTA can be used to assess PSE treatment endpoints. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6380856/ /pubmed/30702608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014312 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Ishikawa, Toru
Imai, Michitaka
Okoshi, Marina
Tomiyoshi, Kei
Kojima, Yuichi
Horigome, Ryoko
Nozawa, Yujiro
Sano, Tomoe
Iwanaga, Akito
Honma, Terasu
Yoshida, Toshiaki
Cone beam versus conventional computed tomography angiography volume measurement in partial splenic embolization
title Cone beam versus conventional computed tomography angiography volume measurement in partial splenic embolization
title_full Cone beam versus conventional computed tomography angiography volume measurement in partial splenic embolization
title_fullStr Cone beam versus conventional computed tomography angiography volume measurement in partial splenic embolization
title_full_unstemmed Cone beam versus conventional computed tomography angiography volume measurement in partial splenic embolization
title_short Cone beam versus conventional computed tomography angiography volume measurement in partial splenic embolization
title_sort cone beam versus conventional computed tomography angiography volume measurement in partial splenic embolization
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6380856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30702608
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014312
work_keys_str_mv AT ishikawatoru conebeamversusconventionalcomputedtomographyangiographyvolumemeasurementinpartialsplenicembolization
AT imaimichitaka conebeamversusconventionalcomputedtomographyangiographyvolumemeasurementinpartialsplenicembolization
AT okoshimarina conebeamversusconventionalcomputedtomographyangiographyvolumemeasurementinpartialsplenicembolization
AT tomiyoshikei conebeamversusconventionalcomputedtomographyangiographyvolumemeasurementinpartialsplenicembolization
AT kojimayuichi conebeamversusconventionalcomputedtomographyangiographyvolumemeasurementinpartialsplenicembolization
AT horigomeryoko conebeamversusconventionalcomputedtomographyangiographyvolumemeasurementinpartialsplenicembolization
AT nozawayujiro conebeamversusconventionalcomputedtomographyangiographyvolumemeasurementinpartialsplenicembolization
AT sanotomoe conebeamversusconventionalcomputedtomographyangiographyvolumemeasurementinpartialsplenicembolization
AT iwanagaakito conebeamversusconventionalcomputedtomographyangiographyvolumemeasurementinpartialsplenicembolization
AT honmaterasu conebeamversusconventionalcomputedtomographyangiographyvolumemeasurementinpartialsplenicembolization
AT yoshidatoshiaki conebeamversusconventionalcomputedtomographyangiographyvolumemeasurementinpartialsplenicembolization