Cargando…
Sex Differences in Human Olfaction: A Meta-Analysis
Although the view that women's olfactory abilities outperform men's is taken for granted, some studies involving large samples suggested that male and female olfactory abilities are actually similar. To address this discrepancy, we conducted a meta-analysis of existing studies on olfaction...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6381007/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30814965 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00242 |
_version_ | 1783396396647317504 |
---|---|
author | Sorokowski, Piotr Karwowski, Maciej Misiak, Michał Marczak, Michalina Konstancja Dziekan, Martyna Hummel, Thomas Sorokowska, Agnieszka |
author_facet | Sorokowski, Piotr Karwowski, Maciej Misiak, Michał Marczak, Michalina Konstancja Dziekan, Martyna Hummel, Thomas Sorokowska, Agnieszka |
author_sort | Sorokowski, Piotr |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although the view that women's olfactory abilities outperform men's is taken for granted, some studies involving large samples suggested that male and female olfactory abilities are actually similar. To address this discrepancy, we conducted a meta-analysis of existing studies on olfaction, targeting possible sex differences. The analyzed sample comprised n = 8 848 (5 065 women and 3 783 men) for olfactory threshold (as measured with the Sniffin Sticks Test; SST), n = 8 067 (4 496 women and 3 571 men) for discrimination (SST), n = 13 670 (7 501 women and 6 169 men) for identification (SST), and a total sample of n = 7 154 (3 866 women and 3 288 men) for works using University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT). We conducted separate meta-analyses for each aspect of olfaction: identification, discrimination and threshold. The results of our meta-analysis indicate that women generally outperform men in olfactory abilities. What is more, they do so in every aspect of olfaction analyzed in the current study. However, the effect sizes were weak and ranged between g = 0.08 and g = 0.30. We discuss our findings in the context of factors that potentially shape sex differences in olfaction. Nevertheless, although our findings seem to confirm the “common knowledge” on female olfactory superiority, it needs to be emphasized that the effect sizes we observed were notably small. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6381007 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63810072019-02-27 Sex Differences in Human Olfaction: A Meta-Analysis Sorokowski, Piotr Karwowski, Maciej Misiak, Michał Marczak, Michalina Konstancja Dziekan, Martyna Hummel, Thomas Sorokowska, Agnieszka Front Psychol Psychology Although the view that women's olfactory abilities outperform men's is taken for granted, some studies involving large samples suggested that male and female olfactory abilities are actually similar. To address this discrepancy, we conducted a meta-analysis of existing studies on olfaction, targeting possible sex differences. The analyzed sample comprised n = 8 848 (5 065 women and 3 783 men) for olfactory threshold (as measured with the Sniffin Sticks Test; SST), n = 8 067 (4 496 women and 3 571 men) for discrimination (SST), n = 13 670 (7 501 women and 6 169 men) for identification (SST), and a total sample of n = 7 154 (3 866 women and 3 288 men) for works using University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT). We conducted separate meta-analyses for each aspect of olfaction: identification, discrimination and threshold. The results of our meta-analysis indicate that women generally outperform men in olfactory abilities. What is more, they do so in every aspect of olfaction analyzed in the current study. However, the effect sizes were weak and ranged between g = 0.08 and g = 0.30. We discuss our findings in the context of factors that potentially shape sex differences in olfaction. Nevertheless, although our findings seem to confirm the “common knowledge” on female olfactory superiority, it needs to be emphasized that the effect sizes we observed were notably small. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6381007/ /pubmed/30814965 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00242 Text en Copyright © 2019 Sorokowski, Karwowski, Misiak, Marczak, Dziekan, Hummel and Sorokowska. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Sorokowski, Piotr Karwowski, Maciej Misiak, Michał Marczak, Michalina Konstancja Dziekan, Martyna Hummel, Thomas Sorokowska, Agnieszka Sex Differences in Human Olfaction: A Meta-Analysis |
title | Sex Differences in Human Olfaction: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Sex Differences in Human Olfaction: A Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Sex Differences in Human Olfaction: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Sex Differences in Human Olfaction: A Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Sex Differences in Human Olfaction: A Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | sex differences in human olfaction: a meta-analysis |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6381007/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30814965 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00242 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sorokowskipiotr sexdifferencesinhumanolfactionametaanalysis AT karwowskimaciej sexdifferencesinhumanolfactionametaanalysis AT misiakmichał sexdifferencesinhumanolfactionametaanalysis AT marczakmichalinakonstancja sexdifferencesinhumanolfactionametaanalysis AT dziekanmartyna sexdifferencesinhumanolfactionametaanalysis AT hummelthomas sexdifferencesinhumanolfactionametaanalysis AT sorokowskaagnieszka sexdifferencesinhumanolfactionametaanalysis |