Cargando…

Sex Differences in Human Olfaction: A Meta-Analysis

Although the view that women's olfactory abilities outperform men's is taken for granted, some studies involving large samples suggested that male and female olfactory abilities are actually similar. To address this discrepancy, we conducted a meta-analysis of existing studies on olfaction...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sorokowski, Piotr, Karwowski, Maciej, Misiak, Michał, Marczak, Michalina Konstancja, Dziekan, Martyna, Hummel, Thomas, Sorokowska, Agnieszka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6381007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30814965
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00242
_version_ 1783396396647317504
author Sorokowski, Piotr
Karwowski, Maciej
Misiak, Michał
Marczak, Michalina Konstancja
Dziekan, Martyna
Hummel, Thomas
Sorokowska, Agnieszka
author_facet Sorokowski, Piotr
Karwowski, Maciej
Misiak, Michał
Marczak, Michalina Konstancja
Dziekan, Martyna
Hummel, Thomas
Sorokowska, Agnieszka
author_sort Sorokowski, Piotr
collection PubMed
description Although the view that women's olfactory abilities outperform men's is taken for granted, some studies involving large samples suggested that male and female olfactory abilities are actually similar. To address this discrepancy, we conducted a meta-analysis of existing studies on olfaction, targeting possible sex differences. The analyzed sample comprised n = 8 848 (5 065 women and 3 783 men) for olfactory threshold (as measured with the Sniffin Sticks Test; SST), n = 8 067 (4 496 women and 3 571 men) for discrimination (SST), n = 13 670 (7 501 women and 6 169 men) for identification (SST), and a total sample of n = 7 154 (3 866 women and 3 288 men) for works using University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT). We conducted separate meta-analyses for each aspect of olfaction: identification, discrimination and threshold. The results of our meta-analysis indicate that women generally outperform men in olfactory abilities. What is more, they do so in every aspect of olfaction analyzed in the current study. However, the effect sizes were weak and ranged between g = 0.08 and g = 0.30. We discuss our findings in the context of factors that potentially shape sex differences in olfaction. Nevertheless, although our findings seem to confirm the “common knowledge” on female olfactory superiority, it needs to be emphasized that the effect sizes we observed were notably small.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6381007
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63810072019-02-27 Sex Differences in Human Olfaction: A Meta-Analysis Sorokowski, Piotr Karwowski, Maciej Misiak, Michał Marczak, Michalina Konstancja Dziekan, Martyna Hummel, Thomas Sorokowska, Agnieszka Front Psychol Psychology Although the view that women's olfactory abilities outperform men's is taken for granted, some studies involving large samples suggested that male and female olfactory abilities are actually similar. To address this discrepancy, we conducted a meta-analysis of existing studies on olfaction, targeting possible sex differences. The analyzed sample comprised n = 8 848 (5 065 women and 3 783 men) for olfactory threshold (as measured with the Sniffin Sticks Test; SST), n = 8 067 (4 496 women and 3 571 men) for discrimination (SST), n = 13 670 (7 501 women and 6 169 men) for identification (SST), and a total sample of n = 7 154 (3 866 women and 3 288 men) for works using University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT). We conducted separate meta-analyses for each aspect of olfaction: identification, discrimination and threshold. The results of our meta-analysis indicate that women generally outperform men in olfactory abilities. What is more, they do so in every aspect of olfaction analyzed in the current study. However, the effect sizes were weak and ranged between g = 0.08 and g = 0.30. We discuss our findings in the context of factors that potentially shape sex differences in olfaction. Nevertheless, although our findings seem to confirm the “common knowledge” on female olfactory superiority, it needs to be emphasized that the effect sizes we observed were notably small. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6381007/ /pubmed/30814965 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00242 Text en Copyright © 2019 Sorokowski, Karwowski, Misiak, Marczak, Dziekan, Hummel and Sorokowska. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Sorokowski, Piotr
Karwowski, Maciej
Misiak, Michał
Marczak, Michalina Konstancja
Dziekan, Martyna
Hummel, Thomas
Sorokowska, Agnieszka
Sex Differences in Human Olfaction: A Meta-Analysis
title Sex Differences in Human Olfaction: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Sex Differences in Human Olfaction: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Sex Differences in Human Olfaction: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Sex Differences in Human Olfaction: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Sex Differences in Human Olfaction: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort sex differences in human olfaction: a meta-analysis
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6381007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30814965
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00242
work_keys_str_mv AT sorokowskipiotr sexdifferencesinhumanolfactionametaanalysis
AT karwowskimaciej sexdifferencesinhumanolfactionametaanalysis
AT misiakmichał sexdifferencesinhumanolfactionametaanalysis
AT marczakmichalinakonstancja sexdifferencesinhumanolfactionametaanalysis
AT dziekanmartyna sexdifferencesinhumanolfactionametaanalysis
AT hummelthomas sexdifferencesinhumanolfactionametaanalysis
AT sorokowskaagnieszka sexdifferencesinhumanolfactionametaanalysis