Cargando…

Performance of Microbiome Sequence Inference Methods in Environments with Varying Biomass

Microbiome community composition plays an important role in human health, and while most research to date has focused on high-microbial-biomass communities, low-biomass communities are also important. However, contamination and technical noise make determining the true community signal difficult whe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Caruso, Vincent, Song, Xubo, Asquith, Mark, Karstens, Lisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6381225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30801029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00163-18
_version_ 1783396469049393152
author Caruso, Vincent
Song, Xubo
Asquith, Mark
Karstens, Lisa
author_facet Caruso, Vincent
Song, Xubo
Asquith, Mark
Karstens, Lisa
author_sort Caruso, Vincent
collection PubMed
description Microbiome community composition plays an important role in human health, and while most research to date has focused on high-microbial-biomass communities, low-biomass communities are also important. However, contamination and technical noise make determining the true community signal difficult when biomass levels are low, and the influence of varying biomass on sequence processing methods has received little attention. Here, we benchmarked six methods that infer community composition from 16S rRNA sequence reads, using samples of varying biomass. We included two operational taxonomic unit (OTU) clustering algorithms, one entropy-based method, and three more-recent amplicon sequence variant (ASV) methods. We first compared inference results from high-biomass mock communities to assess baseline performance. We then benchmarked the methods on a dilution series made from a single mock community—samples that varied only in biomass. ASVs/OTUs inferred by each method were classified as representing expected community, technical noise, or contamination. With the high-biomass data, we found that the ASV methods had good sensitivity and precision, whereas the other methods suffered in one area or in both. Inferred contamination was present only in small proportions. With the dilution series, contamination represented an increasing proportion of the data from the inferred communities, regardless of the inference method used. However, correlation between inferred contaminants and sample biomass was strongest for the ASV methods and weakest for the OTU methods. Thus, no inference method on its own can distinguish true community sequences from contaminant sequences, but ASV methods provide the most accurate characterization of community and contaminants. IMPORTANCE Microbial communities have important ramifications for human health, but determining their impact requires accurate characterization. Current technology makes microbiome sequence data more accessible than ever. However, popular software methods for analyzing these data are based on algorithms developed alongside older sequencing technology and smaller data sets and thus may not be adequate for modern, high-throughput data sets. Additionally, samples from environments where microbes are scarce present additional challenges to community characterization relative to high-biomass environments, an issue that is often ignored. We found that a new class of microbiome sequence processing tools, called amplicon sequence variant (ASV) methods, outperformed conventional methods. In samples representing low-biomass communities, where sample contamination becomes a significant confounding factor, the improved accuracy of ASV methods may allow more-robust computational identification of contaminants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6381225
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63812252019-02-22 Performance of Microbiome Sequence Inference Methods in Environments with Varying Biomass Caruso, Vincent Song, Xubo Asquith, Mark Karstens, Lisa mSystems Research Article Microbiome community composition plays an important role in human health, and while most research to date has focused on high-microbial-biomass communities, low-biomass communities are also important. However, contamination and technical noise make determining the true community signal difficult when biomass levels are low, and the influence of varying biomass on sequence processing methods has received little attention. Here, we benchmarked six methods that infer community composition from 16S rRNA sequence reads, using samples of varying biomass. We included two operational taxonomic unit (OTU) clustering algorithms, one entropy-based method, and three more-recent amplicon sequence variant (ASV) methods. We first compared inference results from high-biomass mock communities to assess baseline performance. We then benchmarked the methods on a dilution series made from a single mock community—samples that varied only in biomass. ASVs/OTUs inferred by each method were classified as representing expected community, technical noise, or contamination. With the high-biomass data, we found that the ASV methods had good sensitivity and precision, whereas the other methods suffered in one area or in both. Inferred contamination was present only in small proportions. With the dilution series, contamination represented an increasing proportion of the data from the inferred communities, regardless of the inference method used. However, correlation between inferred contaminants and sample biomass was strongest for the ASV methods and weakest for the OTU methods. Thus, no inference method on its own can distinguish true community sequences from contaminant sequences, but ASV methods provide the most accurate characterization of community and contaminants. IMPORTANCE Microbial communities have important ramifications for human health, but determining their impact requires accurate characterization. Current technology makes microbiome sequence data more accessible than ever. However, popular software methods for analyzing these data are based on algorithms developed alongside older sequencing technology and smaller data sets and thus may not be adequate for modern, high-throughput data sets. Additionally, samples from environments where microbes are scarce present additional challenges to community characterization relative to high-biomass environments, an issue that is often ignored. We found that a new class of microbiome sequence processing tools, called amplicon sequence variant (ASV) methods, outperformed conventional methods. In samples representing low-biomass communities, where sample contamination becomes a significant confounding factor, the improved accuracy of ASV methods may allow more-robust computational identification of contaminants. American Society for Microbiology 2019-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6381225/ /pubmed/30801029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00163-18 Text en Copyright © 2019 Caruso et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Caruso, Vincent
Song, Xubo
Asquith, Mark
Karstens, Lisa
Performance of Microbiome Sequence Inference Methods in Environments with Varying Biomass
title Performance of Microbiome Sequence Inference Methods in Environments with Varying Biomass
title_full Performance of Microbiome Sequence Inference Methods in Environments with Varying Biomass
title_fullStr Performance of Microbiome Sequence Inference Methods in Environments with Varying Biomass
title_full_unstemmed Performance of Microbiome Sequence Inference Methods in Environments with Varying Biomass
title_short Performance of Microbiome Sequence Inference Methods in Environments with Varying Biomass
title_sort performance of microbiome sequence inference methods in environments with varying biomass
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6381225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30801029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00163-18
work_keys_str_mv AT carusovincent performanceofmicrobiomesequenceinferencemethodsinenvironmentswithvaryingbiomass
AT songxubo performanceofmicrobiomesequenceinferencemethodsinenvironmentswithvaryingbiomass
AT asquithmark performanceofmicrobiomesequenceinferencemethodsinenvironmentswithvaryingbiomass
AT karstenslisa performanceofmicrobiomesequenceinferencemethodsinenvironmentswithvaryingbiomass