Cargando…

Feasibility and acceptability of suicide prevention therapy on acute psychiatric wards: randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Suicidal behaviour is common in acute psychiatric wards resulting in distress, and burden for patients, carers and society. Although psychological therapies for suicidal behaviour are effective in out-patient settings, there is little research on their effectiveness for in-patients who a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haddock, Gillian, Pratt, Daniel, Gooding, Patricia A., Peters, Sarah, Emsley, Richard, Evans, Emma, Kelly, James, Huggett, Charlotte, Munro, Ailsa, Harris, Kamelia, Davies, Linda, Awenat, Yvonne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6381415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30762509
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2018.85
_version_ 1783396488507817984
author Haddock, Gillian
Pratt, Daniel
Gooding, Patricia A.
Peters, Sarah
Emsley, Richard
Evans, Emma
Kelly, James
Huggett, Charlotte
Munro, Ailsa
Harris, Kamelia
Davies, Linda
Awenat, Yvonne
author_facet Haddock, Gillian
Pratt, Daniel
Gooding, Patricia A.
Peters, Sarah
Emsley, Richard
Evans, Emma
Kelly, James
Huggett, Charlotte
Munro, Ailsa
Harris, Kamelia
Davies, Linda
Awenat, Yvonne
author_sort Haddock, Gillian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Suicidal behaviour is common in acute psychiatric wards resulting in distress, and burden for patients, carers and society. Although psychological therapies for suicidal behaviour are effective in out-patient settings, there is little research on their effectiveness for in-patients who are suicidal. AIMS: Our primary objective was to determine whether cognitive–behavioural suicide prevention therapy (CBSP) was feasible and acceptable, compared with treatment as usual (TAU) for in-patients who are suicidal. Secondary aims were to assess the impact of CBSP on suicidal thinking, behaviours, functioning, quality of life, service use, cost-effectiveness and psychological factors associated with suicide. METHOD: A single-blind pilot randomised controlled trial comparing TAU to TAU plus CBSP in in-patients in acute psychiatric wards who are suicidal (the Inpatient Suicide Intervention and Therapy Evaluation (INSITE) trial, trial registration: ISRCTN17890126). The intervention consisted of TAU plus up to 20 CBSP sessions, over 6 months continuing in the community following discharge. Participants were assessed at baseline and at 6 weeks and 6 months post-baseline. RESULTS: A total of 51 individuals were randomised (27 to TAU, 24 to TAU plus CBSP) of whom 37 were followed up at 6 months (19 in TAU, 18 in TAU plus CBSP). Engagement, attendance, safety and user feedback indicated that the addition of CBSP to TAU for in-patients who are acutely suicidal was feasible and acceptable while on in-patient wards and following discharge. Economic analysis suggests the intervention could be cost-effective. DISCUSSION: Psychological therapy can be delivered safely to patients who are suicidal although modifications are required for this setting. Findings indicate a larger, definitive trial should be conducted. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: The trial was hosted by Greater Manchester Mental health NHS Trust (formerly, Manchester Mental Health and Social Care NHS Trust). The authors are affiliated to the University of Manchester, Greater Manchester Mental Health Foundation Trust, Lancashire Care NHS Foundation trust and the Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre. Y.A. is a trustee for a North-West England branch of the charity Mind.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6381415
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63814152019-02-26 Feasibility and acceptability of suicide prevention therapy on acute psychiatric wards: randomised controlled trial Haddock, Gillian Pratt, Daniel Gooding, Patricia A. Peters, Sarah Emsley, Richard Evans, Emma Kelly, James Huggett, Charlotte Munro, Ailsa Harris, Kamelia Davies, Linda Awenat, Yvonne BJPsych Open Papers BACKGROUND: Suicidal behaviour is common in acute psychiatric wards resulting in distress, and burden for patients, carers and society. Although psychological therapies for suicidal behaviour are effective in out-patient settings, there is little research on their effectiveness for in-patients who are suicidal. AIMS: Our primary objective was to determine whether cognitive–behavioural suicide prevention therapy (CBSP) was feasible and acceptable, compared with treatment as usual (TAU) for in-patients who are suicidal. Secondary aims were to assess the impact of CBSP on suicidal thinking, behaviours, functioning, quality of life, service use, cost-effectiveness and psychological factors associated with suicide. METHOD: A single-blind pilot randomised controlled trial comparing TAU to TAU plus CBSP in in-patients in acute psychiatric wards who are suicidal (the Inpatient Suicide Intervention and Therapy Evaluation (INSITE) trial, trial registration: ISRCTN17890126). The intervention consisted of TAU plus up to 20 CBSP sessions, over 6 months continuing in the community following discharge. Participants were assessed at baseline and at 6 weeks and 6 months post-baseline. RESULTS: A total of 51 individuals were randomised (27 to TAU, 24 to TAU plus CBSP) of whom 37 were followed up at 6 months (19 in TAU, 18 in TAU plus CBSP). Engagement, attendance, safety and user feedback indicated that the addition of CBSP to TAU for in-patients who are acutely suicidal was feasible and acceptable while on in-patient wards and following discharge. Economic analysis suggests the intervention could be cost-effective. DISCUSSION: Psychological therapy can be delivered safely to patients who are suicidal although modifications are required for this setting. Findings indicate a larger, definitive trial should be conducted. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: The trial was hosted by Greater Manchester Mental health NHS Trust (formerly, Manchester Mental Health and Social Care NHS Trust). The authors are affiliated to the University of Manchester, Greater Manchester Mental Health Foundation Trust, Lancashire Care NHS Foundation trust and the Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre. Y.A. is a trustee for a North-West England branch of the charity Mind. Cambridge University Press 2019-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6381415/ /pubmed/30762509 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2018.85 Text en © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Papers
Haddock, Gillian
Pratt, Daniel
Gooding, Patricia A.
Peters, Sarah
Emsley, Richard
Evans, Emma
Kelly, James
Huggett, Charlotte
Munro, Ailsa
Harris, Kamelia
Davies, Linda
Awenat, Yvonne
Feasibility and acceptability of suicide prevention therapy on acute psychiatric wards: randomised controlled trial
title Feasibility and acceptability of suicide prevention therapy on acute psychiatric wards: randomised controlled trial
title_full Feasibility and acceptability of suicide prevention therapy on acute psychiatric wards: randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Feasibility and acceptability of suicide prevention therapy on acute psychiatric wards: randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility and acceptability of suicide prevention therapy on acute psychiatric wards: randomised controlled trial
title_short Feasibility and acceptability of suicide prevention therapy on acute psychiatric wards: randomised controlled trial
title_sort feasibility and acceptability of suicide prevention therapy on acute psychiatric wards: randomised controlled trial
topic Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6381415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30762509
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2018.85
work_keys_str_mv AT haddockgillian feasibilityandacceptabilityofsuicidepreventiontherapyonacutepsychiatricwardsrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT prattdaniel feasibilityandacceptabilityofsuicidepreventiontherapyonacutepsychiatricwardsrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT goodingpatriciaa feasibilityandacceptabilityofsuicidepreventiontherapyonacutepsychiatricwardsrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT peterssarah feasibilityandacceptabilityofsuicidepreventiontherapyonacutepsychiatricwardsrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT emsleyrichard feasibilityandacceptabilityofsuicidepreventiontherapyonacutepsychiatricwardsrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT evansemma feasibilityandacceptabilityofsuicidepreventiontherapyonacutepsychiatricwardsrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kellyjames feasibilityandacceptabilityofsuicidepreventiontherapyonacutepsychiatricwardsrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT huggettcharlotte feasibilityandacceptabilityofsuicidepreventiontherapyonacutepsychiatricwardsrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT munroailsa feasibilityandacceptabilityofsuicidepreventiontherapyonacutepsychiatricwardsrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT harriskamelia feasibilityandacceptabilityofsuicidepreventiontherapyonacutepsychiatricwardsrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT davieslinda feasibilityandacceptabilityofsuicidepreventiontherapyonacutepsychiatricwardsrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT awenatyvonne feasibilityandacceptabilityofsuicidepreventiontherapyonacutepsychiatricwardsrandomisedcontrolledtrial