Cargando…
Differences in diagnostic activity in general practice and findings for individuals invited to the danish screening programme for colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort study
Objective: To investigate the diagnostic activity in general practice and the cumulative incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in individuals invited to the Danish national screening programme for CRC. Design: A historical population-based cohort study. Setting: The Danish CRC screening programme and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6381544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29929415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2018.1487378 |
_version_ | 1783396518673252352 |
---|---|
author | Juul, Jakob Søgaard Andersen, Berit Laurberg, Søren Carlsen, Anders Helles Olesen, Frede Vedsted, Peter |
author_facet | Juul, Jakob Søgaard Andersen, Berit Laurberg, Søren Carlsen, Anders Helles Olesen, Frede Vedsted, Peter |
author_sort | Juul, Jakob Søgaard |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To investigate the diagnostic activity in general practice and the cumulative incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in individuals invited to the Danish national screening programme for CRC. Design: A historical population-based cohort study. Setting: The Danish CRC screening programme and general practice. Subjects: The 376,198 individuals invited to the Danish CRC screening programme from 1 March to 31 December 2014. Main outcome Measures: The diagnostic activity (consultations and haemoglobin measures) in general practice in the year preceding the screening invitation and the cumulated incidence of CRC in the year following the screening invitation. Results: Screening participants had significantly higher diagnostic activity than non-participants. Individuals with a positive faecal immunochemical test (FIT) had higher diagnostic activity compared to individuals with a negative FIT, and a small increase in the months leading up to the invitation. Individuals with a screen-detected CRC had lower diagnostic activity than individuals with no CRC. In total, 308 (25.3%) of CRCs diagnosed in the invited population were diagnosed outside the screening programme. Non-participants with CRC more often had low socio-economic status, high comorbidity and stage IV CRC than participants with CRC. Conclusions: KEY POINTS: Current awareness:Individuals with colorectal cancer (CRC) in screening may be symptomatic and CRC may still occur outside screening in the invited population. Most important points:The majority of individuals with CRC in screening cannot be expected to be diagnosed on symptomatic presentation in general practice. GPs have to be aware that CRC still occurs outside screening in the invited population. Non-participants with CRC are often deprived and have late stage CRC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6381544 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63815442019-03-07 Differences in diagnostic activity in general practice and findings for individuals invited to the danish screening programme for colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort study Juul, Jakob Søgaard Andersen, Berit Laurberg, Søren Carlsen, Anders Helles Olesen, Frede Vedsted, Peter Scand J Prim Health Care Research Article Objective: To investigate the diagnostic activity in general practice and the cumulative incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in individuals invited to the Danish national screening programme for CRC. Design: A historical population-based cohort study. Setting: The Danish CRC screening programme and general practice. Subjects: The 376,198 individuals invited to the Danish CRC screening programme from 1 March to 31 December 2014. Main outcome Measures: The diagnostic activity (consultations and haemoglobin measures) in general practice in the year preceding the screening invitation and the cumulated incidence of CRC in the year following the screening invitation. Results: Screening participants had significantly higher diagnostic activity than non-participants. Individuals with a positive faecal immunochemical test (FIT) had higher diagnostic activity compared to individuals with a negative FIT, and a small increase in the months leading up to the invitation. Individuals with a screen-detected CRC had lower diagnostic activity than individuals with no CRC. In total, 308 (25.3%) of CRCs diagnosed in the invited population were diagnosed outside the screening programme. Non-participants with CRC more often had low socio-economic status, high comorbidity and stage IV CRC than participants with CRC. Conclusions: KEY POINTS: Current awareness:Individuals with colorectal cancer (CRC) in screening may be symptomatic and CRC may still occur outside screening in the invited population. Most important points:The majority of individuals with CRC in screening cannot be expected to be diagnosed on symptomatic presentation in general practice. GPs have to be aware that CRC still occurs outside screening in the invited population. Non-participants with CRC are often deprived and have late stage CRC. Taylor & Francis 2018-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6381544/ /pubmed/29929415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2018.1487378 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Juul, Jakob Søgaard Andersen, Berit Laurberg, Søren Carlsen, Anders Helles Olesen, Frede Vedsted, Peter Differences in diagnostic activity in general practice and findings for individuals invited to the danish screening programme for colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort study |
title | Differences in diagnostic activity in general practice and findings for individuals invited to the danish screening programme for colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort study |
title_full | Differences in diagnostic activity in general practice and findings for individuals invited to the danish screening programme for colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort study |
title_fullStr | Differences in diagnostic activity in general practice and findings for individuals invited to the danish screening programme for colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in diagnostic activity in general practice and findings for individuals invited to the danish screening programme for colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort study |
title_short | Differences in diagnostic activity in general practice and findings for individuals invited to the danish screening programme for colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort study |
title_sort | differences in diagnostic activity in general practice and findings for individuals invited to the danish screening programme for colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6381544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29929415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2018.1487378 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT juuljakobsøgaard differencesindiagnosticactivityingeneralpracticeandfindingsforindividualsinvitedtothedanishscreeningprogrammeforcolorectalcancerapopulationbasedcohortstudy AT andersenberit differencesindiagnosticactivityingeneralpracticeandfindingsforindividualsinvitedtothedanishscreeningprogrammeforcolorectalcancerapopulationbasedcohortstudy AT laurbergsøren differencesindiagnosticactivityingeneralpracticeandfindingsforindividualsinvitedtothedanishscreeningprogrammeforcolorectalcancerapopulationbasedcohortstudy AT carlsenandershelles differencesindiagnosticactivityingeneralpracticeandfindingsforindividualsinvitedtothedanishscreeningprogrammeforcolorectalcancerapopulationbasedcohortstudy AT olesenfrede differencesindiagnosticactivityingeneralpracticeandfindingsforindividualsinvitedtothedanishscreeningprogrammeforcolorectalcancerapopulationbasedcohortstudy AT vedstedpeter differencesindiagnosticactivityingeneralpracticeandfindingsforindividualsinvitedtothedanishscreeningprogrammeforcolorectalcancerapopulationbasedcohortstudy |