Cargando…

Differences in diagnostic activity in general practice and findings for individuals invited to the danish screening programme for colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort study

Objective: To investigate the diagnostic activity in general practice and the cumulative incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in individuals invited to the Danish national screening programme for CRC. Design: A historical population-based cohort study. Setting: The Danish CRC screening programme and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Juul, Jakob Søgaard, Andersen, Berit, Laurberg, Søren, Carlsen, Anders Helles, Olesen, Frede, Vedsted, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6381544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29929415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2018.1487378
_version_ 1783396518673252352
author Juul, Jakob Søgaard
Andersen, Berit
Laurberg, Søren
Carlsen, Anders Helles
Olesen, Frede
Vedsted, Peter
author_facet Juul, Jakob Søgaard
Andersen, Berit
Laurberg, Søren
Carlsen, Anders Helles
Olesen, Frede
Vedsted, Peter
author_sort Juul, Jakob Søgaard
collection PubMed
description Objective: To investigate the diagnostic activity in general practice and the cumulative incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in individuals invited to the Danish national screening programme for CRC. Design: A historical population-based cohort study. Setting: The Danish CRC screening programme and general practice. Subjects: The 376,198 individuals invited to the Danish CRC screening programme from 1 March to 31 December 2014. Main outcome Measures: The diagnostic activity (consultations and haemoglobin measures) in general practice in the year preceding the screening invitation and the cumulated incidence of CRC in the year following the screening invitation. Results: Screening participants had significantly higher diagnostic activity than non-participants. Individuals with a positive faecal immunochemical test (FIT) had higher diagnostic activity compared to individuals with a negative FIT, and a small increase in the months leading up to the invitation. Individuals with a screen-detected CRC had lower diagnostic activity than individuals with no CRC. In total, 308 (25.3%) of CRCs diagnosed in the invited population were diagnosed outside the screening programme. Non-participants with CRC more often had low socio-economic status, high comorbidity and stage IV CRC than participants with CRC. Conclusions: KEY POINTS: Current awareness:Individuals with colorectal cancer (CRC) in screening may be symptomatic and CRC may still occur outside screening in the invited population. Most important points:The majority of individuals with CRC in screening cannot be expected to be diagnosed on symptomatic presentation in general practice. GPs have to be aware that CRC still occurs outside screening in the invited population. Non-participants with CRC are often deprived and have late stage CRC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6381544
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63815442019-03-07 Differences in diagnostic activity in general practice and findings for individuals invited to the danish screening programme for colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort study Juul, Jakob Søgaard Andersen, Berit Laurberg, Søren Carlsen, Anders Helles Olesen, Frede Vedsted, Peter Scand J Prim Health Care Research Article Objective: To investigate the diagnostic activity in general practice and the cumulative incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in individuals invited to the Danish national screening programme for CRC. Design: A historical population-based cohort study. Setting: The Danish CRC screening programme and general practice. Subjects: The 376,198 individuals invited to the Danish CRC screening programme from 1 March to 31 December 2014. Main outcome Measures: The diagnostic activity (consultations and haemoglobin measures) in general practice in the year preceding the screening invitation and the cumulated incidence of CRC in the year following the screening invitation. Results: Screening participants had significantly higher diagnostic activity than non-participants. Individuals with a positive faecal immunochemical test (FIT) had higher diagnostic activity compared to individuals with a negative FIT, and a small increase in the months leading up to the invitation. Individuals with a screen-detected CRC had lower diagnostic activity than individuals with no CRC. In total, 308 (25.3%) of CRCs diagnosed in the invited population were diagnosed outside the screening programme. Non-participants with CRC more often had low socio-economic status, high comorbidity and stage IV CRC than participants with CRC. Conclusions: KEY POINTS: Current awareness:Individuals with colorectal cancer (CRC) in screening may be symptomatic and CRC may still occur outside screening in the invited population. Most important points:The majority of individuals with CRC in screening cannot be expected to be diagnosed on symptomatic presentation in general practice. GPs have to be aware that CRC still occurs outside screening in the invited population. Non-participants with CRC are often deprived and have late stage CRC. Taylor & Francis 2018-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6381544/ /pubmed/29929415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2018.1487378 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Juul, Jakob Søgaard
Andersen, Berit
Laurberg, Søren
Carlsen, Anders Helles
Olesen, Frede
Vedsted, Peter
Differences in diagnostic activity in general practice and findings for individuals invited to the danish screening programme for colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort study
title Differences in diagnostic activity in general practice and findings for individuals invited to the danish screening programme for colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort study
title_full Differences in diagnostic activity in general practice and findings for individuals invited to the danish screening programme for colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort study
title_fullStr Differences in diagnostic activity in general practice and findings for individuals invited to the danish screening programme for colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Differences in diagnostic activity in general practice and findings for individuals invited to the danish screening programme for colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort study
title_short Differences in diagnostic activity in general practice and findings for individuals invited to the danish screening programme for colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort study
title_sort differences in diagnostic activity in general practice and findings for individuals invited to the danish screening programme for colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6381544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29929415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2018.1487378
work_keys_str_mv AT juuljakobsøgaard differencesindiagnosticactivityingeneralpracticeandfindingsforindividualsinvitedtothedanishscreeningprogrammeforcolorectalcancerapopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT andersenberit differencesindiagnosticactivityingeneralpracticeandfindingsforindividualsinvitedtothedanishscreeningprogrammeforcolorectalcancerapopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT laurbergsøren differencesindiagnosticactivityingeneralpracticeandfindingsforindividualsinvitedtothedanishscreeningprogrammeforcolorectalcancerapopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT carlsenandershelles differencesindiagnosticactivityingeneralpracticeandfindingsforindividualsinvitedtothedanishscreeningprogrammeforcolorectalcancerapopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT olesenfrede differencesindiagnosticactivityingeneralpracticeandfindingsforindividualsinvitedtothedanishscreeningprogrammeforcolorectalcancerapopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT vedstedpeter differencesindiagnosticactivityingeneralpracticeandfindingsforindividualsinvitedtothedanishscreeningprogrammeforcolorectalcancerapopulationbasedcohortstudy