Cargando…

The SURV1VE trial—sustained inflation and chest compression versus 3:1 chest compression-to-ventilation ratio during cardiopulmonary resuscitation of asphyxiated newborns: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The need for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is often unexpected, and the infrequent use of CPR in the delivery room (DR) limits the opportunity to perform rigorous clinical studies to determine the best method for delivering chest compression (CC) to newborn infants. The current neo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmölzer, Georg M., Pichler, Gerhard, Solevåg, Anne Lee, Fray, Caroline, van Os, Sylvia, Cheung, Po-Yin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6381608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30782199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3240-8
_version_ 1783396531063226368
author Schmölzer, Georg M.
Pichler, Gerhard
Solevåg, Anne Lee
Fray, Caroline
van Os, Sylvia
Cheung, Po-Yin
author_facet Schmölzer, Georg M.
Pichler, Gerhard
Solevåg, Anne Lee
Fray, Caroline
van Os, Sylvia
Cheung, Po-Yin
author_sort Schmölzer, Georg M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The need for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is often unexpected, and the infrequent use of CPR in the delivery room (DR) limits the opportunity to perform rigorous clinical studies to determine the best method for delivering chest compression (CC) to newborn infants. The current neonatal resuscitation guidelines recommend using a coordinated 3:1 compression-to-ventilation (C:V) ratio (CC at a rate of 90/min and ventilations at a rate of 30/min). In comparison, providing CC during a sustained inflation (SI) (CC + SI) significantly improved hemodynamics, minute ventilation, and time to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) compared to 3:1 C:V ratio in asphyxiated piglets. Similarly, a small pilot trial in newborn infants showed similar results. Until now no study has examined different CC techniques during neonatal resuscitation in asphyxiated newborn infants in the DR. To date, no trial has been performed to directly compare CC + SI and 3:1 C:V ratio in the DR during CPR of asphyxiated newborn infants. METHODS: This is a large, international, multi-center, prospective, unblinded, cluster randomized controlled trial in asphyxiated newborn infants at birth. All term and preterm infants > 28(+ 0) by best obstetrical estimate who require CPR at birth due to bradycardia (< 60/min) or asystole are eligible. The primary outcome of this study is to compare the time to ROSC in infants born > 28(+ 0) weeks’ gestational age with bradycardia (< 60/min) or asystole immediately after birth who receive either CC + SI or 3:1 C:V ratio as the CPR strategy. DISCUSSION: Morbidity and mortality rates are extremely high for newborns requiring CC. We believe the combination of simultaneous CC and SI during CPR has the potential to significantly improve ROSC and survival. In addition, we believe that CC + SI might improve respiratory and hemodynamic parameters and potentially minimize morbidity and mortality in newborn infants. In addition, this will be the first randomized controlled trial to examine CC in the newborn period. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02858583. Registered on 8 August 2016 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3240-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6381608
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63816082019-02-28 The SURV1VE trial—sustained inflation and chest compression versus 3:1 chest compression-to-ventilation ratio during cardiopulmonary resuscitation of asphyxiated newborns: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial Schmölzer, Georg M. Pichler, Gerhard Solevåg, Anne Lee Fray, Caroline van Os, Sylvia Cheung, Po-Yin Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The need for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is often unexpected, and the infrequent use of CPR in the delivery room (DR) limits the opportunity to perform rigorous clinical studies to determine the best method for delivering chest compression (CC) to newborn infants. The current neonatal resuscitation guidelines recommend using a coordinated 3:1 compression-to-ventilation (C:V) ratio (CC at a rate of 90/min and ventilations at a rate of 30/min). In comparison, providing CC during a sustained inflation (SI) (CC + SI) significantly improved hemodynamics, minute ventilation, and time to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) compared to 3:1 C:V ratio in asphyxiated piglets. Similarly, a small pilot trial in newborn infants showed similar results. Until now no study has examined different CC techniques during neonatal resuscitation in asphyxiated newborn infants in the DR. To date, no trial has been performed to directly compare CC + SI and 3:1 C:V ratio in the DR during CPR of asphyxiated newborn infants. METHODS: This is a large, international, multi-center, prospective, unblinded, cluster randomized controlled trial in asphyxiated newborn infants at birth. All term and preterm infants > 28(+ 0) by best obstetrical estimate who require CPR at birth due to bradycardia (< 60/min) or asystole are eligible. The primary outcome of this study is to compare the time to ROSC in infants born > 28(+ 0) weeks’ gestational age with bradycardia (< 60/min) or asystole immediately after birth who receive either CC + SI or 3:1 C:V ratio as the CPR strategy. DISCUSSION: Morbidity and mortality rates are extremely high for newborns requiring CC. We believe the combination of simultaneous CC and SI during CPR has the potential to significantly improve ROSC and survival. In addition, we believe that CC + SI might improve respiratory and hemodynamic parameters and potentially minimize morbidity and mortality in newborn infants. In addition, this will be the first randomized controlled trial to examine CC in the newborn period. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02858583. Registered on 8 August 2016 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3240-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6381608/ /pubmed/30782199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3240-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Schmölzer, Georg M.
Pichler, Gerhard
Solevåg, Anne Lee
Fray, Caroline
van Os, Sylvia
Cheung, Po-Yin
The SURV1VE trial—sustained inflation and chest compression versus 3:1 chest compression-to-ventilation ratio during cardiopulmonary resuscitation of asphyxiated newborns: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial
title The SURV1VE trial—sustained inflation and chest compression versus 3:1 chest compression-to-ventilation ratio during cardiopulmonary resuscitation of asphyxiated newborns: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial
title_full The SURV1VE trial—sustained inflation and chest compression versus 3:1 chest compression-to-ventilation ratio during cardiopulmonary resuscitation of asphyxiated newborns: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr The SURV1VE trial—sustained inflation and chest compression versus 3:1 chest compression-to-ventilation ratio during cardiopulmonary resuscitation of asphyxiated newborns: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The SURV1VE trial—sustained inflation and chest compression versus 3:1 chest compression-to-ventilation ratio during cardiopulmonary resuscitation of asphyxiated newborns: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial
title_short The SURV1VE trial—sustained inflation and chest compression versus 3:1 chest compression-to-ventilation ratio during cardiopulmonary resuscitation of asphyxiated newborns: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial
title_sort surv1ve trial—sustained inflation and chest compression versus 3:1 chest compression-to-ventilation ratio during cardiopulmonary resuscitation of asphyxiated newborns: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6381608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30782199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3240-8
work_keys_str_mv AT schmolzergeorgm thesurv1vetrialsustainedinflationandchestcompressionversus31chestcompressiontoventilationratioduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationofasphyxiatednewbornsstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pichlergerhard thesurv1vetrialsustainedinflationandchestcompressionversus31chestcompressiontoventilationratioduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationofasphyxiatednewbornsstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT solevagannelee thesurv1vetrialsustainedinflationandchestcompressionversus31chestcompressiontoventilationratioduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationofasphyxiatednewbornsstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fraycaroline thesurv1vetrialsustainedinflationandchestcompressionversus31chestcompressiontoventilationratioduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationofasphyxiatednewbornsstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanossylvia thesurv1vetrialsustainedinflationandchestcompressionversus31chestcompressiontoventilationratioduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationofasphyxiatednewbornsstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cheungpoyin thesurv1vetrialsustainedinflationandchestcompressionversus31chestcompressiontoventilationratioduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationofasphyxiatednewbornsstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT thesurv1vetrialsustainedinflationandchestcompressionversus31chestcompressiontoventilationratioduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationofasphyxiatednewbornsstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT schmolzergeorgm surv1vetrialsustainedinflationandchestcompressionversus31chestcompressiontoventilationratioduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationofasphyxiatednewbornsstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pichlergerhard surv1vetrialsustainedinflationandchestcompressionversus31chestcompressiontoventilationratioduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationofasphyxiatednewbornsstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT solevagannelee surv1vetrialsustainedinflationandchestcompressionversus31chestcompressiontoventilationratioduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationofasphyxiatednewbornsstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fraycaroline surv1vetrialsustainedinflationandchestcompressionversus31chestcompressiontoventilationratioduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationofasphyxiatednewbornsstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanossylvia surv1vetrialsustainedinflationandchestcompressionversus31chestcompressiontoventilationratioduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationofasphyxiatednewbornsstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cheungpoyin surv1vetrialsustainedinflationandchestcompressionversus31chestcompressiontoventilationratioduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationofasphyxiatednewbornsstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT surv1vetrialsustainedinflationandchestcompressionversus31chestcompressiontoventilationratioduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationofasphyxiatednewbornsstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial