Cargando…
Characteristics and quality of clinical practice guidelines for depression in adults: a scoping review
BACKGROUND: Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) should follow an adequate methodology using an evidence-based approach in order to provide reliable recommendations. However, little is known regarding the quality of CPGs for Depression, which precludes its adequate use by stakeholders and mental heal...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6381686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30786870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2057-z |
_version_ | 1783396550395822080 |
---|---|
author | Zafra-Tanaka, Jessica Hanae Goicochea-Lugo, Sergio Villarreal-Zegarra, David Taype-Rondan, Alvaro |
author_facet | Zafra-Tanaka, Jessica Hanae Goicochea-Lugo, Sergio Villarreal-Zegarra, David Taype-Rondan, Alvaro |
author_sort | Zafra-Tanaka, Jessica Hanae |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) should follow an adequate methodology using an evidence-based approach in order to provide reliable recommendations. However, little is known regarding the quality of CPGs for Depression, which precludes its adequate use by stakeholders and mental health professionals. Thus, the aim of this study was to conduct a scoping review to describe the characteristics and quality of CPGs for Depression in adults. METHODS: We searched CPGs for Depression in adults in eighteen databases. We included those that were published in English or Spanish between January 2014 and May 2018 and were based on systematic reviews of the evidence. Two independent authors extracted the characteristics, type and number of recommendations, and quality (using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation-II [AGREE-II]) of each included CPG. RESULTS: We included eleven CPGs, of which 9/11 did not include the participation of patients in the development of the CPG, 4/11 CPGs had a score ≥ 70% in the overall evaluation of AGREE-II, and 3/11 CPGs had a score ≥ 70% in its third domain (rigor of development). In addition, only 5/11 CPGs shared their search strategy, while only 4/11 listed the selected studies they used to reach recommendations, and 7/11 CPGs did not clearly state which methodology they used to translate evidence into a recommendation. CONCLUSIONS: Most of evaluated CPGs did not take into account the patient’s viewpoints, achieved a low score in the rigor of development domain, and did not clearly state the process used to reach the recommendations. Stakeholders, CPCGs developers, and CPGs users should take this into account when choosing CPGs, and interpreting and putting into practice their issued recommendations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12888-019-2057-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6381686 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63816862019-03-01 Characteristics and quality of clinical practice guidelines for depression in adults: a scoping review Zafra-Tanaka, Jessica Hanae Goicochea-Lugo, Sergio Villarreal-Zegarra, David Taype-Rondan, Alvaro BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) should follow an adequate methodology using an evidence-based approach in order to provide reliable recommendations. However, little is known regarding the quality of CPGs for Depression, which precludes its adequate use by stakeholders and mental health professionals. Thus, the aim of this study was to conduct a scoping review to describe the characteristics and quality of CPGs for Depression in adults. METHODS: We searched CPGs for Depression in adults in eighteen databases. We included those that were published in English or Spanish between January 2014 and May 2018 and were based on systematic reviews of the evidence. Two independent authors extracted the characteristics, type and number of recommendations, and quality (using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation-II [AGREE-II]) of each included CPG. RESULTS: We included eleven CPGs, of which 9/11 did not include the participation of patients in the development of the CPG, 4/11 CPGs had a score ≥ 70% in the overall evaluation of AGREE-II, and 3/11 CPGs had a score ≥ 70% in its third domain (rigor of development). In addition, only 5/11 CPGs shared their search strategy, while only 4/11 listed the selected studies they used to reach recommendations, and 7/11 CPGs did not clearly state which methodology they used to translate evidence into a recommendation. CONCLUSIONS: Most of evaluated CPGs did not take into account the patient’s viewpoints, achieved a low score in the rigor of development domain, and did not clearly state the process used to reach the recommendations. Stakeholders, CPCGs developers, and CPGs users should take this into account when choosing CPGs, and interpreting and putting into practice their issued recommendations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12888-019-2057-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6381686/ /pubmed/30786870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2057-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zafra-Tanaka, Jessica Hanae Goicochea-Lugo, Sergio Villarreal-Zegarra, David Taype-Rondan, Alvaro Characteristics and quality of clinical practice guidelines for depression in adults: a scoping review |
title | Characteristics and quality of clinical practice guidelines for depression in adults: a scoping review |
title_full | Characteristics and quality of clinical practice guidelines for depression in adults: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Characteristics and quality of clinical practice guidelines for depression in adults: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Characteristics and quality of clinical practice guidelines for depression in adults: a scoping review |
title_short | Characteristics and quality of clinical practice guidelines for depression in adults: a scoping review |
title_sort | characteristics and quality of clinical practice guidelines for depression in adults: a scoping review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6381686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30786870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2057-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zafratanakajessicahanae characteristicsandqualityofclinicalpracticeguidelinesfordepressioninadultsascopingreview AT goicochealugosergio characteristicsandqualityofclinicalpracticeguidelinesfordepressioninadultsascopingreview AT villarrealzegarradavid characteristicsandqualityofclinicalpracticeguidelinesfordepressioninadultsascopingreview AT tayperondanalvaro characteristicsandqualityofclinicalpracticeguidelinesfordepressioninadultsascopingreview |