Cargando…

Monitoring PRRSV-1 in suckling piglets in an endemic herd using reverse transcriptase quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction: comparison of the rate of detection in serum and oral fluid samples and evaluation of pooling

BACKGROUND: Defining shedding and exposure status for PRRSV is essential in herd stabilisation protocols and weaning-age pigs is a key subpopulation. Oral fluid (OF) sampling is a welfare-friendly and cost saving promising alternative to blood sampling. The first objective of our study was to compar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lebret, Arnaud, Boulbria, Gwenaël, Berton, Pauline, Moalic, Pierre-Yves, Le Guennec, Jean, Bouchet, Franck, Auvigne, Vincent, Normand, Valérie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6381726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30820335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-019-0115-z
_version_ 1783396560838590464
author Lebret, Arnaud
Boulbria, Gwenaël
Berton, Pauline
Moalic, Pierre-Yves
Le Guennec, Jean
Bouchet, Franck
Auvigne, Vincent
Normand, Valérie
author_facet Lebret, Arnaud
Boulbria, Gwenaël
Berton, Pauline
Moalic, Pierre-Yves
Le Guennec, Jean
Bouchet, Franck
Auvigne, Vincent
Normand, Valérie
author_sort Lebret, Arnaud
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Defining shedding and exposure status for PRRSV is essential in herd stabilisation protocols and weaning-age pigs is a key subpopulation. Oral fluid (OF) sampling is a welfare-friendly and cost saving promising alternative to blood sampling. The first objective of our study was to compare the rate of detection of PRRSV-1 in individual serum sample, individual OF sample, litter-based OF sample, collected the day before weaning. The second objective was to evaluate the interest of pooling samples. RESULTS: The study was performed on a 210-sows, PRRSV-1 exposed, with confirmed shedding, non-vaccinated against PRRSV, herd. 80 litters were sampled and 26 were viropositive and therefore included. The rate of detection of PRRSV-1 with RT-qrtPCR in blood samples, iOF and cOF was 67, 23 and 77%, respectively. The Ct values from RT-qrtPCR on collective OF were statistically lower if the serum of the piglet of the litter was positive. The lower the Cycle threshold (Ct) value of RT-qrtPCR on collective OF, the higher the probability that the serum sampled in the same litter was positive. Ability to detect PRRSV RNA after pooling was 67% for sera and 58% for cOF. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of detection of PRRSV-1 was about the same in cOF and blood samples. Virus sequencing, if required, should be performed on individual serum samples. The smaller the Ct of a cOF sample from a litter, the greater the likelihood that the serum sample from a piglet of that litter is positive. A cost-effective and representative sampling protocol to monitor sow herds stabilisation of a sow batch could be: to collect both cOF and one serum sample per litter; to perform firstly RT-qrtPCR on pooled cOF; in case of negative results to consider the batch negative; in case of positive results in a unvaccinated herd or a killed vaccine vaccinated one to consider the batch positive; in case of positive result in a herd vaccinated with a modified live vaccine serum samples of litters with positive cOF should be tested for sequencing (selecting the litters with the lowest Ct for cOF).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6381726
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63817262019-02-28 Monitoring PRRSV-1 in suckling piglets in an endemic herd using reverse transcriptase quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction: comparison of the rate of detection in serum and oral fluid samples and evaluation of pooling Lebret, Arnaud Boulbria, Gwenaël Berton, Pauline Moalic, Pierre-Yves Le Guennec, Jean Bouchet, Franck Auvigne, Vincent Normand, Valérie Porcine Health Manag Research BACKGROUND: Defining shedding and exposure status for PRRSV is essential in herd stabilisation protocols and weaning-age pigs is a key subpopulation. Oral fluid (OF) sampling is a welfare-friendly and cost saving promising alternative to blood sampling. The first objective of our study was to compare the rate of detection of PRRSV-1 in individual serum sample, individual OF sample, litter-based OF sample, collected the day before weaning. The second objective was to evaluate the interest of pooling samples. RESULTS: The study was performed on a 210-sows, PRRSV-1 exposed, with confirmed shedding, non-vaccinated against PRRSV, herd. 80 litters were sampled and 26 were viropositive and therefore included. The rate of detection of PRRSV-1 with RT-qrtPCR in blood samples, iOF and cOF was 67, 23 and 77%, respectively. The Ct values from RT-qrtPCR on collective OF were statistically lower if the serum of the piglet of the litter was positive. The lower the Cycle threshold (Ct) value of RT-qrtPCR on collective OF, the higher the probability that the serum sampled in the same litter was positive. Ability to detect PRRSV RNA after pooling was 67% for sera and 58% for cOF. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of detection of PRRSV-1 was about the same in cOF and blood samples. Virus sequencing, if required, should be performed on individual serum samples. The smaller the Ct of a cOF sample from a litter, the greater the likelihood that the serum sample from a piglet of that litter is positive. A cost-effective and representative sampling protocol to monitor sow herds stabilisation of a sow batch could be: to collect both cOF and one serum sample per litter; to perform firstly RT-qrtPCR on pooled cOF; in case of negative results to consider the batch negative; in case of positive results in a unvaccinated herd or a killed vaccine vaccinated one to consider the batch positive; in case of positive result in a herd vaccinated with a modified live vaccine serum samples of litters with positive cOF should be tested for sequencing (selecting the litters with the lowest Ct for cOF). BioMed Central 2019-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6381726/ /pubmed/30820335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-019-0115-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Lebret, Arnaud
Boulbria, Gwenaël
Berton, Pauline
Moalic, Pierre-Yves
Le Guennec, Jean
Bouchet, Franck
Auvigne, Vincent
Normand, Valérie
Monitoring PRRSV-1 in suckling piglets in an endemic herd using reverse transcriptase quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction: comparison of the rate of detection in serum and oral fluid samples and evaluation of pooling
title Monitoring PRRSV-1 in suckling piglets in an endemic herd using reverse transcriptase quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction: comparison of the rate of detection in serum and oral fluid samples and evaluation of pooling
title_full Monitoring PRRSV-1 in suckling piglets in an endemic herd using reverse transcriptase quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction: comparison of the rate of detection in serum and oral fluid samples and evaluation of pooling
title_fullStr Monitoring PRRSV-1 in suckling piglets in an endemic herd using reverse transcriptase quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction: comparison of the rate of detection in serum and oral fluid samples and evaluation of pooling
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring PRRSV-1 in suckling piglets in an endemic herd using reverse transcriptase quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction: comparison of the rate of detection in serum and oral fluid samples and evaluation of pooling
title_short Monitoring PRRSV-1 in suckling piglets in an endemic herd using reverse transcriptase quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction: comparison of the rate of detection in serum and oral fluid samples and evaluation of pooling
title_sort monitoring prrsv-1 in suckling piglets in an endemic herd using reverse transcriptase quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction: comparison of the rate of detection in serum and oral fluid samples and evaluation of pooling
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6381726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30820335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-019-0115-z
work_keys_str_mv AT lebretarnaud monitoringprrsv1insucklingpigletsinanendemicherdusingreversetranscriptasequantitativerealtimepolymerasechainreactioncomparisonoftherateofdetectioninserumandoralfluidsamplesandevaluationofpooling
AT boulbriagwenael monitoringprrsv1insucklingpigletsinanendemicherdusingreversetranscriptasequantitativerealtimepolymerasechainreactioncomparisonoftherateofdetectioninserumandoralfluidsamplesandevaluationofpooling
AT bertonpauline monitoringprrsv1insucklingpigletsinanendemicherdusingreversetranscriptasequantitativerealtimepolymerasechainreactioncomparisonoftherateofdetectioninserumandoralfluidsamplesandevaluationofpooling
AT moalicpierreyves monitoringprrsv1insucklingpigletsinanendemicherdusingreversetranscriptasequantitativerealtimepolymerasechainreactioncomparisonoftherateofdetectioninserumandoralfluidsamplesandevaluationofpooling
AT leguennecjean monitoringprrsv1insucklingpigletsinanendemicherdusingreversetranscriptasequantitativerealtimepolymerasechainreactioncomparisonoftherateofdetectioninserumandoralfluidsamplesandevaluationofpooling
AT bouchetfranck monitoringprrsv1insucklingpigletsinanendemicherdusingreversetranscriptasequantitativerealtimepolymerasechainreactioncomparisonoftherateofdetectioninserumandoralfluidsamplesandevaluationofpooling
AT auvignevincent monitoringprrsv1insucklingpigletsinanendemicherdusingreversetranscriptasequantitativerealtimepolymerasechainreactioncomparisonoftherateofdetectioninserumandoralfluidsamplesandevaluationofpooling
AT normandvalerie monitoringprrsv1insucklingpigletsinanendemicherdusingreversetranscriptasequantitativerealtimepolymerasechainreactioncomparisonoftherateofdetectioninserumandoralfluidsamplesandevaluationofpooling