Cargando…

Subcutaneous Prosthetic Breast Reconstructions following Skin Reduction Mastectomy

BACKGROUND: Prepectoral prosthetic breast reconstruction is gaining popularity, offering muscle preservation and outcomes similar to subpectoral implant placement in small or moderate size breasts. This study compares the complications of prepectoral and subpectoral immediate prosthetic breast recon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Komorowska-Timek, Ewa, Merrifield, Brittany, Turfe, Zaahir, Davis, Alan T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6382245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30859037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002078
_version_ 1783396634163412992
author Komorowska-Timek, Ewa
Merrifield, Brittany
Turfe, Zaahir
Davis, Alan T.
author_facet Komorowska-Timek, Ewa
Merrifield, Brittany
Turfe, Zaahir
Davis, Alan T.
author_sort Komorowska-Timek, Ewa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prepectoral prosthetic breast reconstruction is gaining popularity, offering muscle preservation and outcomes similar to subpectoral implant placement in small or moderate size breasts. This study compares the complications of prepectoral and subpectoral immediate prosthetic breast reconstructions following skin reduction mastectomy in large and ptotic breasts. METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent immediate tissue expander-based reconstruction following Wise pattern skin reduction mastectomy from November 2011 through August 2017 by a single surgeon were reviewed. The collected data included patient demographics and complications (eg, skin necrosis, hematoma, infection, seroma, implant loss, capsular contracture). RESULTS: A total of 54 patients underwent 87 immediate breast reconstructions including 45 subpectoral and 42 prepectoral tissue expander placements. The subpectoral patients had greater body mass indexes (32.5 ± 6.6 versus 29.9 ± 5.4, P = 0.026), higher initial (518 ± 168 ml versus 288 ± 140 ml, P < 0.001) and final (694 ± 123 ml versus 585 ± 122 ml, P = 0.014) implant volumes, more skin flap necrosis (40.0% versus 16.7%, P = 0.044) and infections (37.8% versus 11.9%, P = 0.01) than their prepectoral counterparts, whereas seromas were more common in the prepectoral group (4.4% versus 26.2%, P = 0.015). The overall complication rate, although higher in the subpectoral group compared with the prepectoral group, was not significantly different (62.2% versus 40.5%, P = 0.072). CONCLUSIONS: Prepectoral tissue expander placement after skin reduction mastectomy is an appealing reconstructive option in patients with large and ptotic breasts. Prosthetic reconstruction following Wise-pattern skin reduction mastectomy is invariably associated with high complication rates irrespective of the plane of implant placement. Greater emphasis should be placed on patient counseling and complication prevention in this challenging patient population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6382245
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63822452019-03-11 Subcutaneous Prosthetic Breast Reconstructions following Skin Reduction Mastectomy Komorowska-Timek, Ewa Merrifield, Brittany Turfe, Zaahir Davis, Alan T. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Prepectoral prosthetic breast reconstruction is gaining popularity, offering muscle preservation and outcomes similar to subpectoral implant placement in small or moderate size breasts. This study compares the complications of prepectoral and subpectoral immediate prosthetic breast reconstructions following skin reduction mastectomy in large and ptotic breasts. METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent immediate tissue expander-based reconstruction following Wise pattern skin reduction mastectomy from November 2011 through August 2017 by a single surgeon were reviewed. The collected data included patient demographics and complications (eg, skin necrosis, hematoma, infection, seroma, implant loss, capsular contracture). RESULTS: A total of 54 patients underwent 87 immediate breast reconstructions including 45 subpectoral and 42 prepectoral tissue expander placements. The subpectoral patients had greater body mass indexes (32.5 ± 6.6 versus 29.9 ± 5.4, P = 0.026), higher initial (518 ± 168 ml versus 288 ± 140 ml, P < 0.001) and final (694 ± 123 ml versus 585 ± 122 ml, P = 0.014) implant volumes, more skin flap necrosis (40.0% versus 16.7%, P = 0.044) and infections (37.8% versus 11.9%, P = 0.01) than their prepectoral counterparts, whereas seromas were more common in the prepectoral group (4.4% versus 26.2%, P = 0.015). The overall complication rate, although higher in the subpectoral group compared with the prepectoral group, was not significantly different (62.2% versus 40.5%, P = 0.072). CONCLUSIONS: Prepectoral tissue expander placement after skin reduction mastectomy is an appealing reconstructive option in patients with large and ptotic breasts. Prosthetic reconstruction following Wise-pattern skin reduction mastectomy is invariably associated with high complication rates irrespective of the plane of implant placement. Greater emphasis should be placed on patient counseling and complication prevention in this challenging patient population. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6382245/ /pubmed/30859037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002078 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Article
Komorowska-Timek, Ewa
Merrifield, Brittany
Turfe, Zaahir
Davis, Alan T.
Subcutaneous Prosthetic Breast Reconstructions following Skin Reduction Mastectomy
title Subcutaneous Prosthetic Breast Reconstructions following Skin Reduction Mastectomy
title_full Subcutaneous Prosthetic Breast Reconstructions following Skin Reduction Mastectomy
title_fullStr Subcutaneous Prosthetic Breast Reconstructions following Skin Reduction Mastectomy
title_full_unstemmed Subcutaneous Prosthetic Breast Reconstructions following Skin Reduction Mastectomy
title_short Subcutaneous Prosthetic Breast Reconstructions following Skin Reduction Mastectomy
title_sort subcutaneous prosthetic breast reconstructions following skin reduction mastectomy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6382245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30859037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002078
work_keys_str_mv AT komorowskatimekewa subcutaneousprostheticbreastreconstructionsfollowingskinreductionmastectomy
AT merrifieldbrittany subcutaneousprostheticbreastreconstructionsfollowingskinreductionmastectomy
AT turfezaahir subcutaneousprostheticbreastreconstructionsfollowingskinreductionmastectomy
AT davisalant subcutaneousprostheticbreastreconstructionsfollowingskinreductionmastectomy