Cargando…
Enhancing translational researchers’ ability to collaborate with community stakeholders: Lessons from the Community Engagement Studio
Community engagement is considered essential to effectively translate research into practice and is increasingly recognized as a key to successful clinical trial recruitment. Challenges to engaging community stakeholders in research persist and new methods are needed to facilitate meaningful stakeho...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6382358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30820357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.323 |
_version_ | 1783396660988084224 |
---|---|
author | Joosten, Yvonne A. Israel, Tiffany L. Head, Amy Vaughn, Yolanda Villalta Gil, Victoria Mouton, Charles Wilkins, Consuelo H. |
author_facet | Joosten, Yvonne A. Israel, Tiffany L. Head, Amy Vaughn, Yolanda Villalta Gil, Victoria Mouton, Charles Wilkins, Consuelo H. |
author_sort | Joosten, Yvonne A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Community engagement is considered essential to effectively translate research into practice and is increasingly recognized as a key to successful clinical trial recruitment. Challenges to engaging community stakeholders in research persist and new methods are needed to facilitate meaningful stakeholder involvement. The Community Engagement Studio (CE Studio), a consultative model, has been used at every stage of the research process. Best practices drawn from the model could inform other methods of engagement. Using a mixed-methods approach that included evaluation surveys, impact surveys and interviews, we assessed the CE Studio program. We analyzed data from 75 CE Studios; 65 researchers and 591 community members completed surveys and 10 researchers completed interviews. Surveys indicate that 100% of researchers would request a CE Studio in the future, and 99.3% of community members would participate in a CE Studio again. We identified 6 practices to enhance community engagement in clinical and translational research: early input, researcher coaching, researcher humility, balancing power, neutral facilitator, and preparation of community stakeholders. These best practices may enhance the quality of existing community engagement approaches and improve the effectiveness of translational researchers’ efforts to engage community stakeholders in their work. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6382358 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63823582019-02-26 Enhancing translational researchers’ ability to collaborate with community stakeholders: Lessons from the Community Engagement Studio Joosten, Yvonne A. Israel, Tiffany L. Head, Amy Vaughn, Yolanda Villalta Gil, Victoria Mouton, Charles Wilkins, Consuelo H. J Clin Transl Sci Implementation, Policy and Community Engagement Community engagement is considered essential to effectively translate research into practice and is increasingly recognized as a key to successful clinical trial recruitment. Challenges to engaging community stakeholders in research persist and new methods are needed to facilitate meaningful stakeholder involvement. The Community Engagement Studio (CE Studio), a consultative model, has been used at every stage of the research process. Best practices drawn from the model could inform other methods of engagement. Using a mixed-methods approach that included evaluation surveys, impact surveys and interviews, we assessed the CE Studio program. We analyzed data from 75 CE Studios; 65 researchers and 591 community members completed surveys and 10 researchers completed interviews. Surveys indicate that 100% of researchers would request a CE Studio in the future, and 99.3% of community members would participate in a CE Studio again. We identified 6 practices to enhance community engagement in clinical and translational research: early input, researcher coaching, researcher humility, balancing power, neutral facilitator, and preparation of community stakeholders. These best practices may enhance the quality of existing community engagement approaches and improve the effectiveness of translational researchers’ efforts to engage community stakeholders in their work. Cambridge University Press 2018-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6382358/ /pubmed/30820357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.323 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Implementation, Policy and Community Engagement Joosten, Yvonne A. Israel, Tiffany L. Head, Amy Vaughn, Yolanda Villalta Gil, Victoria Mouton, Charles Wilkins, Consuelo H. Enhancing translational researchers’ ability to collaborate with community stakeholders: Lessons from the Community Engagement Studio |
title | Enhancing translational researchers’ ability to collaborate with community stakeholders: Lessons from the Community Engagement Studio |
title_full | Enhancing translational researchers’ ability to collaborate with community stakeholders: Lessons from the Community Engagement Studio |
title_fullStr | Enhancing translational researchers’ ability to collaborate with community stakeholders: Lessons from the Community Engagement Studio |
title_full_unstemmed | Enhancing translational researchers’ ability to collaborate with community stakeholders: Lessons from the Community Engagement Studio |
title_short | Enhancing translational researchers’ ability to collaborate with community stakeholders: Lessons from the Community Engagement Studio |
title_sort | enhancing translational researchers’ ability to collaborate with community stakeholders: lessons from the community engagement studio |
topic | Implementation, Policy and Community Engagement |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6382358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30820357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.323 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT joostenyvonnea enhancingtranslationalresearchersabilitytocollaboratewithcommunitystakeholderslessonsfromthecommunityengagementstudio AT israeltiffanyl enhancingtranslationalresearchersabilitytocollaboratewithcommunitystakeholderslessonsfromthecommunityengagementstudio AT headamy enhancingtranslationalresearchersabilitytocollaboratewithcommunitystakeholderslessonsfromthecommunityengagementstudio AT vaughnyolanda enhancingtranslationalresearchersabilitytocollaboratewithcommunitystakeholderslessonsfromthecommunityengagementstudio AT villaltagilvictoria enhancingtranslationalresearchersabilitytocollaboratewithcommunitystakeholderslessonsfromthecommunityengagementstudio AT moutoncharles enhancingtranslationalresearchersabilitytocollaboratewithcommunitystakeholderslessonsfromthecommunityengagementstudio AT wilkinsconsueloh enhancingtranslationalresearchersabilitytocollaboratewithcommunitystakeholderslessonsfromthecommunityengagementstudio |