Cargando…

Design and evaluation of a clinical competency committee

INTRODUCTION: In postgraduate medical education, group decision-making has emerged as an essential tool to evaluate the clinical progress of residents. Clinical competency committees (CCCs) have been set up to ensure informed decision-making and provide feedback regarding performance of residents. D...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duitsman, Marrigje E., Fluit, Cornelia R. M. G., van Alfen-van der Velden, Janiëlle A. E. M., de Visser, Marieke, ten Kate-Booij, Marianne, Dolmans, Diana H. J. M., Jaarsma, Debbie A. D. C., de Graaf, Jacqueline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6382624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30656533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-018-0490-1
_version_ 1783396686923563008
author Duitsman, Marrigje E.
Fluit, Cornelia R. M. G.
van Alfen-van der Velden, Janiëlle A. E. M.
de Visser, Marieke
ten Kate-Booij, Marianne
Dolmans, Diana H. J. M.
Jaarsma, Debbie A. D. C.
de Graaf, Jacqueline
author_facet Duitsman, Marrigje E.
Fluit, Cornelia R. M. G.
van Alfen-van der Velden, Janiëlle A. E. M.
de Visser, Marieke
ten Kate-Booij, Marianne
Dolmans, Diana H. J. M.
Jaarsma, Debbie A. D. C.
de Graaf, Jacqueline
author_sort Duitsman, Marrigje E.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In postgraduate medical education, group decision-making has emerged as an essential tool to evaluate the clinical progress of residents. Clinical competency committees (CCCs) have been set up to ensure informed decision-making and provide feedback regarding performance of residents. Despite this important task, it remains unclear how CCCs actually function in practice and how their performance should be evaluated. METHODS: In the prototyping phase of a design-based approach, a CCC meeting was developed, using three theoretical design principles: (1) data from multiple assessment tools and multiple perspectives, (2) a shared mental model and (3) structured discussions. The meetings were held in a university children’s hospital and evaluated using observations, interviews with CCC members and an open-ended questionnaire among residents. RESULTS: The structured discussions during the meetings provided a broad outline of resident performance, including identification of problematic and excellent residents. A shared mental model about the assessment criteria had developed over time. Residents were not always satisfied with the feedback they received after the meeting. Feedback that had been provided to a resident after the first CCC meeting was not addressed in the second meeting. DISCUSSION: The principles that were used to design the CCC meeting were feasible in practice. Structured discussions, based on data from multiple assessment tools and multiple perspectives, provided a broad outline of resident performance. Residency programs that wish to implement CCCs can build on our design principles and adjust the prototype to their particular context. When running a CCC, it is important to consider feedback that has been provided to a resident after the previous meeting and to evaluate whether it has improved the resident’s performance. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40037-018-0490-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6382624
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63826242019-03-10 Design and evaluation of a clinical competency committee Duitsman, Marrigje E. Fluit, Cornelia R. M. G. van Alfen-van der Velden, Janiëlle A. E. M. de Visser, Marieke ten Kate-Booij, Marianne Dolmans, Diana H. J. M. Jaarsma, Debbie A. D. C. de Graaf, Jacqueline Perspect Med Educ Original Article INTRODUCTION: In postgraduate medical education, group decision-making has emerged as an essential tool to evaluate the clinical progress of residents. Clinical competency committees (CCCs) have been set up to ensure informed decision-making and provide feedback regarding performance of residents. Despite this important task, it remains unclear how CCCs actually function in practice and how their performance should be evaluated. METHODS: In the prototyping phase of a design-based approach, a CCC meeting was developed, using three theoretical design principles: (1) data from multiple assessment tools and multiple perspectives, (2) a shared mental model and (3) structured discussions. The meetings were held in a university children’s hospital and evaluated using observations, interviews with CCC members and an open-ended questionnaire among residents. RESULTS: The structured discussions during the meetings provided a broad outline of resident performance, including identification of problematic and excellent residents. A shared mental model about the assessment criteria had developed over time. Residents were not always satisfied with the feedback they received after the meeting. Feedback that had been provided to a resident after the first CCC meeting was not addressed in the second meeting. DISCUSSION: The principles that were used to design the CCC meeting were feasible in practice. Structured discussions, based on data from multiple assessment tools and multiple perspectives, provided a broad outline of resident performance. Residency programs that wish to implement CCCs can build on our design principles and adjust the prototype to their particular context. When running a CCC, it is important to consider feedback that has been provided to a resident after the previous meeting and to evaluate whether it has improved the resident’s performance. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40037-018-0490-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2019-01-17 2019-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6382624/ /pubmed/30656533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-018-0490-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Duitsman, Marrigje E.
Fluit, Cornelia R. M. G.
van Alfen-van der Velden, Janiëlle A. E. M.
de Visser, Marieke
ten Kate-Booij, Marianne
Dolmans, Diana H. J. M.
Jaarsma, Debbie A. D. C.
de Graaf, Jacqueline
Design and evaluation of a clinical competency committee
title Design and evaluation of a clinical competency committee
title_full Design and evaluation of a clinical competency committee
title_fullStr Design and evaluation of a clinical competency committee
title_full_unstemmed Design and evaluation of a clinical competency committee
title_short Design and evaluation of a clinical competency committee
title_sort design and evaluation of a clinical competency committee
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6382624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30656533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-018-0490-1
work_keys_str_mv AT duitsmanmarrigjee designandevaluationofaclinicalcompetencycommittee
AT fluitcorneliarmg designandevaluationofaclinicalcompetencycommittee
AT vanalfenvanderveldenjanielleaem designandevaluationofaclinicalcompetencycommittee
AT devissermarieke designandevaluationofaclinicalcompetencycommittee
AT tenkatebooijmarianne designandevaluationofaclinicalcompetencycommittee
AT dolmansdianahjm designandevaluationofaclinicalcompetencycommittee
AT jaarsmadebbieadc designandevaluationofaclinicalcompetencycommittee
AT degraafjacqueline designandevaluationofaclinicalcompetencycommittee