Cargando…
Intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring in scoliosis surgery in children
OBJECTIVE: Intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring (INM) is thought to reduce the risk of postoperative neurological deficits in children undergoing scoliosis and spine deformity surgery. INM is being used increasingly despite conflicting opinions, varied results, non-standard alarm criteria and c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6383123/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30828671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2018.12.002 |
_version_ | 1783396783936765952 |
---|---|
author | Nagarajan, Lakshmi Ghosh, Soumya Dillon, David Palumbo, Linda Woodland, Peter Thalayasingam, Priya Lethbridge, Martyn |
author_facet | Nagarajan, Lakshmi Ghosh, Soumya Dillon, David Palumbo, Linda Woodland, Peter Thalayasingam, Priya Lethbridge, Martyn |
author_sort | Nagarajan, Lakshmi |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring (INM) is thought to reduce the risk of postoperative neurological deficits in children undergoing scoliosis and spine deformity surgery. INM is being used increasingly despite conflicting opinions, varied results, non-standard alarm criteria and concern regarding cost effectiveness. In this paper we present our experience with INM in scoliosis and spine deformation surgery in children, propose alert criteria and preferred anaesthetics in clinical practice. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed our experience with INM in 56 children who had 61 scoliosis and spine deformity surgeries. RESULTS: INM was successfully undertaken with transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials (TcMEP) and somatosensory evoked potentials. There were no injuries due to INM. Four children had 5 alerts during 4 surgeries. A postoperative deficit was seen in one child only. No new postoperative deficits were seen in any child who did not have an alert during INM. Total intravenous anaesthesia was better for INM compared to inhalational anaesthetics. CONCLUSIONS: INM is useful in scoliosis surgery; it is likely to mitigate the risk of new deficits following surgery. We recommend alert criteria for TcMEPs that include multiple facets – amplitude, stimulus paradigm, morphology. We recommend propofol and remifentanil, in preference to sevoflurane and remifentanil for anaesthesia during INM. SIGNIFICANCE: Our study adds to the literature supporting the role of INM in scoliosis surgery in children. We provide guidelines for alarm criteria in clinical practice and recommend the use of total intravenous anaesthesia as the preferred anaesthetic option. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6383123 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63831232019-03-01 Intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring in scoliosis surgery in children Nagarajan, Lakshmi Ghosh, Soumya Dillon, David Palumbo, Linda Woodland, Peter Thalayasingam, Priya Lethbridge, Martyn Clin Neurophysiol Pract Clinical and Research Article OBJECTIVE: Intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring (INM) is thought to reduce the risk of postoperative neurological deficits in children undergoing scoliosis and spine deformity surgery. INM is being used increasingly despite conflicting opinions, varied results, non-standard alarm criteria and concern regarding cost effectiveness. In this paper we present our experience with INM in scoliosis and spine deformation surgery in children, propose alert criteria and preferred anaesthetics in clinical practice. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed our experience with INM in 56 children who had 61 scoliosis and spine deformity surgeries. RESULTS: INM was successfully undertaken with transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials (TcMEP) and somatosensory evoked potentials. There were no injuries due to INM. Four children had 5 alerts during 4 surgeries. A postoperative deficit was seen in one child only. No new postoperative deficits were seen in any child who did not have an alert during INM. Total intravenous anaesthesia was better for INM compared to inhalational anaesthetics. CONCLUSIONS: INM is useful in scoliosis surgery; it is likely to mitigate the risk of new deficits following surgery. We recommend alert criteria for TcMEPs that include multiple facets – amplitude, stimulus paradigm, morphology. We recommend propofol and remifentanil, in preference to sevoflurane and remifentanil for anaesthesia during INM. SIGNIFICANCE: Our study adds to the literature supporting the role of INM in scoliosis surgery in children. We provide guidelines for alarm criteria in clinical practice and recommend the use of total intravenous anaesthesia as the preferred anaesthetic option. Elsevier 2019-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6383123/ /pubmed/30828671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2018.12.002 Text en © 2019 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Clinical and Research Article Nagarajan, Lakshmi Ghosh, Soumya Dillon, David Palumbo, Linda Woodland, Peter Thalayasingam, Priya Lethbridge, Martyn Intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring in scoliosis surgery in children |
title | Intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring in scoliosis surgery in children |
title_full | Intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring in scoliosis surgery in children |
title_fullStr | Intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring in scoliosis surgery in children |
title_full_unstemmed | Intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring in scoliosis surgery in children |
title_short | Intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring in scoliosis surgery in children |
title_sort | intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring in scoliosis surgery in children |
topic | Clinical and Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6383123/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30828671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2018.12.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nagarajanlakshmi intraoperativeneurophysiologymonitoringinscoliosissurgeryinchildren AT ghoshsoumya intraoperativeneurophysiologymonitoringinscoliosissurgeryinchildren AT dillondavid intraoperativeneurophysiologymonitoringinscoliosissurgeryinchildren AT palumbolinda intraoperativeneurophysiologymonitoringinscoliosissurgeryinchildren AT woodlandpeter intraoperativeneurophysiologymonitoringinscoliosissurgeryinchildren AT thalayasingampriya intraoperativeneurophysiologymonitoringinscoliosissurgeryinchildren AT lethbridgemartyn intraoperativeneurophysiologymonitoringinscoliosissurgeryinchildren |