Cargando…

Intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring in scoliosis surgery in children

OBJECTIVE: Intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring (INM) is thought to reduce the risk of postoperative neurological deficits in children undergoing scoliosis and spine deformity surgery. INM is being used increasingly despite conflicting opinions, varied results, non-standard alarm criteria and c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nagarajan, Lakshmi, Ghosh, Soumya, Dillon, David, Palumbo, Linda, Woodland, Peter, Thalayasingam, Priya, Lethbridge, Martyn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6383123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30828671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2018.12.002
_version_ 1783396783936765952
author Nagarajan, Lakshmi
Ghosh, Soumya
Dillon, David
Palumbo, Linda
Woodland, Peter
Thalayasingam, Priya
Lethbridge, Martyn
author_facet Nagarajan, Lakshmi
Ghosh, Soumya
Dillon, David
Palumbo, Linda
Woodland, Peter
Thalayasingam, Priya
Lethbridge, Martyn
author_sort Nagarajan, Lakshmi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring (INM) is thought to reduce the risk of postoperative neurological deficits in children undergoing scoliosis and spine deformity surgery. INM is being used increasingly despite conflicting opinions, varied results, non-standard alarm criteria and concern regarding cost effectiveness. In this paper we present our experience with INM in scoliosis and spine deformation surgery in children, propose alert criteria and preferred anaesthetics in clinical practice. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed our experience with INM in 56 children who had 61 scoliosis and spine deformity surgeries. RESULTS: INM was successfully undertaken with transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials (TcMEP) and somatosensory evoked potentials. There were no injuries due to INM. Four children had 5 alerts during 4 surgeries. A postoperative deficit was seen in one child only. No new postoperative deficits were seen in any child who did not have an alert during INM. Total intravenous anaesthesia was better for INM compared to inhalational anaesthetics. CONCLUSIONS: INM is useful in scoliosis surgery; it is likely to mitigate the risk of new deficits following surgery. We recommend alert criteria for TcMEPs that include multiple facets – amplitude, stimulus paradigm, morphology. We recommend propofol and remifentanil, in preference to sevoflurane and remifentanil for anaesthesia during INM. SIGNIFICANCE: Our study adds to the literature supporting the role of INM in scoliosis surgery in children. We provide guidelines for alarm criteria in clinical practice and recommend the use of total intravenous anaesthesia as the preferred anaesthetic option.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6383123
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63831232019-03-01 Intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring in scoliosis surgery in children Nagarajan, Lakshmi Ghosh, Soumya Dillon, David Palumbo, Linda Woodland, Peter Thalayasingam, Priya Lethbridge, Martyn Clin Neurophysiol Pract Clinical and Research Article OBJECTIVE: Intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring (INM) is thought to reduce the risk of postoperative neurological deficits in children undergoing scoliosis and spine deformity surgery. INM is being used increasingly despite conflicting opinions, varied results, non-standard alarm criteria and concern regarding cost effectiveness. In this paper we present our experience with INM in scoliosis and spine deformation surgery in children, propose alert criteria and preferred anaesthetics in clinical practice. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed our experience with INM in 56 children who had 61 scoliosis and spine deformity surgeries. RESULTS: INM was successfully undertaken with transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials (TcMEP) and somatosensory evoked potentials. There were no injuries due to INM. Four children had 5 alerts during 4 surgeries. A postoperative deficit was seen in one child only. No new postoperative deficits were seen in any child who did not have an alert during INM. Total intravenous anaesthesia was better for INM compared to inhalational anaesthetics. CONCLUSIONS: INM is useful in scoliosis surgery; it is likely to mitigate the risk of new deficits following surgery. We recommend alert criteria for TcMEPs that include multiple facets – amplitude, stimulus paradigm, morphology. We recommend propofol and remifentanil, in preference to sevoflurane and remifentanil for anaesthesia during INM. SIGNIFICANCE: Our study adds to the literature supporting the role of INM in scoliosis surgery in children. We provide guidelines for alarm criteria in clinical practice and recommend the use of total intravenous anaesthesia as the preferred anaesthetic option. Elsevier 2019-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6383123/ /pubmed/30828671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2018.12.002 Text en © 2019 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Clinical and Research Article
Nagarajan, Lakshmi
Ghosh, Soumya
Dillon, David
Palumbo, Linda
Woodland, Peter
Thalayasingam, Priya
Lethbridge, Martyn
Intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring in scoliosis surgery in children
title Intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring in scoliosis surgery in children
title_full Intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring in scoliosis surgery in children
title_fullStr Intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring in scoliosis surgery in children
title_full_unstemmed Intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring in scoliosis surgery in children
title_short Intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring in scoliosis surgery in children
title_sort intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring in scoliosis surgery in children
topic Clinical and Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6383123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30828671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2018.12.002
work_keys_str_mv AT nagarajanlakshmi intraoperativeneurophysiologymonitoringinscoliosissurgeryinchildren
AT ghoshsoumya intraoperativeneurophysiologymonitoringinscoliosissurgeryinchildren
AT dillondavid intraoperativeneurophysiologymonitoringinscoliosissurgeryinchildren
AT palumbolinda intraoperativeneurophysiologymonitoringinscoliosissurgeryinchildren
AT woodlandpeter intraoperativeneurophysiologymonitoringinscoliosissurgeryinchildren
AT thalayasingampriya intraoperativeneurophysiologymonitoringinscoliosissurgeryinchildren
AT lethbridgemartyn intraoperativeneurophysiologymonitoringinscoliosissurgeryinchildren