Cargando…
The hazards and risks of inhaled poorly soluble particles – where do we stand after 30 years of research?
BACKGROUND: In 2006, titanium dioxide and carbon black were classified by IARC as “possibly carcinogenic to humans” and in 2017 the European Chemicals Agency’s (ECHA) Committee for Risk Assessment concluded titanium dioxide meets the criteria to be classified as suspected of causing cancer (category...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6383218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30791931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12989-019-0294-4 |
_version_ | 1783396798520360960 |
---|---|
author | Borm, Paul J. A. Driscoll, Kevin E. |
author_facet | Borm, Paul J. A. Driscoll, Kevin E. |
author_sort | Borm, Paul J. A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In 2006, titanium dioxide and carbon black were classified by IARC as “possibly carcinogenic to humans” and in 2017 the European Chemicals Agency’s (ECHA) Committee for Risk Assessment concluded titanium dioxide meets the criteria to be classified as suspected of causing cancer (category 2, through the inhalation route). These classifications were based primarily on the occurrence of lung cancer in rats exposed chronically to high concentrations of these materials, as no such responses have been observed in other animal species similarly exposed. After the EU classification of titanium dioxide, it was suggested that Poorly Soluble particles of Low Toxicity (PSLTs) can be evaluated as a group. MAIN BODY: To better understand the current state of scientific opinion, we sought perspective from several international experts on topics relevant to the classification of carbon black; titanium dioxide; and, the potential future classification of PSLTs. Areas discussed included: grouping of PSLTs; the relevance of rat lung cancer responses to high concentrations of PSLTs; and, clearance overload and implications for interpretation of inhalation toxicology studies. We found there were several areas where a large majority of experts, including ourselves, agreed. These included concerns on the grouping of PSLT and the definition of clearance overload. Regarding the extrapolation of PSLT associated lung cancer in rats there were some strongly held differences, although most experts questioned the relevance when excessive exposures which overwhelm lung clearance were required. SHORT CONCLUSION: Given the ongoing discussion on PSLT classification and safety, we believe it is important to re-activate the public debate including experts and stakeholders. Such an open discussion would serve to formally document where scientific consensus and differences exist. This could form the basis for design of future safety programs and safety assessments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6383218 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63832182019-03-01 The hazards and risks of inhaled poorly soluble particles – where do we stand after 30 years of research? Borm, Paul J. A. Driscoll, Kevin E. Part Fibre Toxicol Commentary BACKGROUND: In 2006, titanium dioxide and carbon black were classified by IARC as “possibly carcinogenic to humans” and in 2017 the European Chemicals Agency’s (ECHA) Committee for Risk Assessment concluded titanium dioxide meets the criteria to be classified as suspected of causing cancer (category 2, through the inhalation route). These classifications were based primarily on the occurrence of lung cancer in rats exposed chronically to high concentrations of these materials, as no such responses have been observed in other animal species similarly exposed. After the EU classification of titanium dioxide, it was suggested that Poorly Soluble particles of Low Toxicity (PSLTs) can be evaluated as a group. MAIN BODY: To better understand the current state of scientific opinion, we sought perspective from several international experts on topics relevant to the classification of carbon black; titanium dioxide; and, the potential future classification of PSLTs. Areas discussed included: grouping of PSLTs; the relevance of rat lung cancer responses to high concentrations of PSLTs; and, clearance overload and implications for interpretation of inhalation toxicology studies. We found there were several areas where a large majority of experts, including ourselves, agreed. These included concerns on the grouping of PSLT and the definition of clearance overload. Regarding the extrapolation of PSLT associated lung cancer in rats there were some strongly held differences, although most experts questioned the relevance when excessive exposures which overwhelm lung clearance were required. SHORT CONCLUSION: Given the ongoing discussion on PSLT classification and safety, we believe it is important to re-activate the public debate including experts and stakeholders. Such an open discussion would serve to formally document where scientific consensus and differences exist. This could form the basis for design of future safety programs and safety assessments. BioMed Central 2019-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6383218/ /pubmed/30791931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12989-019-0294-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Borm, Paul J. A. Driscoll, Kevin E. The hazards and risks of inhaled poorly soluble particles – where do we stand after 30 years of research? |
title | The hazards and risks of inhaled poorly soluble particles – where do we stand after 30 years of research? |
title_full | The hazards and risks of inhaled poorly soluble particles – where do we stand after 30 years of research? |
title_fullStr | The hazards and risks of inhaled poorly soluble particles – where do we stand after 30 years of research? |
title_full_unstemmed | The hazards and risks of inhaled poorly soluble particles – where do we stand after 30 years of research? |
title_short | The hazards and risks of inhaled poorly soluble particles – where do we stand after 30 years of research? |
title_sort | hazards and risks of inhaled poorly soluble particles – where do we stand after 30 years of research? |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6383218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30791931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12989-019-0294-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bormpaulja thehazardsandrisksofinhaledpoorlysolubleparticleswheredowestandafter30yearsofresearch AT driscollkevine thehazardsandrisksofinhaledpoorlysolubleparticleswheredowestandafter30yearsofresearch AT bormpaulja hazardsandrisksofinhaledpoorlysolubleparticleswheredowestandafter30yearsofresearch AT driscollkevine hazardsandrisksofinhaledpoorlysolubleparticleswheredowestandafter30yearsofresearch |