Cargando…

A conceptual framework for increasing clinical staff member involvement in general practice: a proposed strategy to improve the management of low back pain

BACKGROUND: Low back pain affects about 80% of all adults, many of whom consult general practice. Providing management can be challenging, in part due to the scarcity of effective treatment methods. There is broad consensus in international clinical practice guidelines to provide patients with infor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Riis, Allan, Karran, Emma L., Hill, Jonathan C., Jensen, Martin B., Thomsen, Janus L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6383226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30791876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-0923-x
_version_ 1783396800488538112
author Riis, Allan
Karran, Emma L.
Hill, Jonathan C.
Jensen, Martin B.
Thomsen, Janus L.
author_facet Riis, Allan
Karran, Emma L.
Hill, Jonathan C.
Jensen, Martin B.
Thomsen, Janus L.
author_sort Riis, Allan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Low back pain affects about 80% of all adults, many of whom consult general practice. Providing management can be challenging, in part due to the scarcity of effective treatment methods. There is broad consensus in international clinical practice guidelines to provide patients with information about the nature of their pain and recommend them to stay active despite discomfort. Delivering this information is time-demanding and challenged by the limited available resources in general practice in many countries. Furthermore, general practice settings are highly variable in size and in their composition of clinical staff members – which presents difficulties, but also opportunities for developing alternative approaches to clinical management. Expanding the patient consultation time by involving clinical staff members (aside from the general practitioner) has been found feasible for other conditions. We propose that this approach is applied for non-specific low back pain. Consequently, we suggest the involvement of clinical staff members as part of a new strategy for managing low back pain in general practice. MAIN TEXT: Multifaceted implementation strategies have the potential to effectively enable change in the clinical management of patients with low back pain in general practice if they are based on theory and are tailored to stake holders. Inspired by the Medical Research Council’s guidance for complex interventions and the ChiPP (Change in professional performance) statement, we suggest applying the following two policy categories: organizational change (environmental/social planning) and service provision. This will involve attention to environmental restructuring, modelling, enabling, education, training, persuasion, and incentivising of general practices, with an over-arching strategy of involving clinical staff members in the management of low back pain. CONCLUSION: This is a pre-clinical proposal of a multifaceted strategy to support the delivery of evidence-based treatment for patients with low back pain in general practice. As an original idea, we suggest it would be feasible to involve clinical staff members in the delivery of information and advice to patients, whilst the general practitioner remains responsible for diagnostic decision-making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6383226
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63832262019-03-01 A conceptual framework for increasing clinical staff member involvement in general practice: a proposed strategy to improve the management of low back pain Riis, Allan Karran, Emma L. Hill, Jonathan C. Jensen, Martin B. Thomsen, Janus L. BMC Fam Pract Debate BACKGROUND: Low back pain affects about 80% of all adults, many of whom consult general practice. Providing management can be challenging, in part due to the scarcity of effective treatment methods. There is broad consensus in international clinical practice guidelines to provide patients with information about the nature of their pain and recommend them to stay active despite discomfort. Delivering this information is time-demanding and challenged by the limited available resources in general practice in many countries. Furthermore, general practice settings are highly variable in size and in their composition of clinical staff members – which presents difficulties, but also opportunities for developing alternative approaches to clinical management. Expanding the patient consultation time by involving clinical staff members (aside from the general practitioner) has been found feasible for other conditions. We propose that this approach is applied for non-specific low back pain. Consequently, we suggest the involvement of clinical staff members as part of a new strategy for managing low back pain in general practice. MAIN TEXT: Multifaceted implementation strategies have the potential to effectively enable change in the clinical management of patients with low back pain in general practice if they are based on theory and are tailored to stake holders. Inspired by the Medical Research Council’s guidance for complex interventions and the ChiPP (Change in professional performance) statement, we suggest applying the following two policy categories: organizational change (environmental/social planning) and service provision. This will involve attention to environmental restructuring, modelling, enabling, education, training, persuasion, and incentivising of general practices, with an over-arching strategy of involving clinical staff members in the management of low back pain. CONCLUSION: This is a pre-clinical proposal of a multifaceted strategy to support the delivery of evidence-based treatment for patients with low back pain in general practice. As an original idea, we suggest it would be feasible to involve clinical staff members in the delivery of information and advice to patients, whilst the general practitioner remains responsible for diagnostic decision-making. BioMed Central 2019-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6383226/ /pubmed/30791876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-0923-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Debate
Riis, Allan
Karran, Emma L.
Hill, Jonathan C.
Jensen, Martin B.
Thomsen, Janus L.
A conceptual framework for increasing clinical staff member involvement in general practice: a proposed strategy to improve the management of low back pain
title A conceptual framework for increasing clinical staff member involvement in general practice: a proposed strategy to improve the management of low back pain
title_full A conceptual framework for increasing clinical staff member involvement in general practice: a proposed strategy to improve the management of low back pain
title_fullStr A conceptual framework for increasing clinical staff member involvement in general practice: a proposed strategy to improve the management of low back pain
title_full_unstemmed A conceptual framework for increasing clinical staff member involvement in general practice: a proposed strategy to improve the management of low back pain
title_short A conceptual framework for increasing clinical staff member involvement in general practice: a proposed strategy to improve the management of low back pain
title_sort conceptual framework for increasing clinical staff member involvement in general practice: a proposed strategy to improve the management of low back pain
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6383226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30791876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-0923-x
work_keys_str_mv AT riisallan aconceptualframeworkforincreasingclinicalstaffmemberinvolvementingeneralpracticeaproposedstrategytoimprovethemanagementoflowbackpain
AT karranemmal aconceptualframeworkforincreasingclinicalstaffmemberinvolvementingeneralpracticeaproposedstrategytoimprovethemanagementoflowbackpain
AT hilljonathanc aconceptualframeworkforincreasingclinicalstaffmemberinvolvementingeneralpracticeaproposedstrategytoimprovethemanagementoflowbackpain
AT jensenmartinb aconceptualframeworkforincreasingclinicalstaffmemberinvolvementingeneralpracticeaproposedstrategytoimprovethemanagementoflowbackpain
AT thomsenjanusl aconceptualframeworkforincreasingclinicalstaffmemberinvolvementingeneralpracticeaproposedstrategytoimprovethemanagementoflowbackpain
AT riisallan conceptualframeworkforincreasingclinicalstaffmemberinvolvementingeneralpracticeaproposedstrategytoimprovethemanagementoflowbackpain
AT karranemmal conceptualframeworkforincreasingclinicalstaffmemberinvolvementingeneralpracticeaproposedstrategytoimprovethemanagementoflowbackpain
AT hilljonathanc conceptualframeworkforincreasingclinicalstaffmemberinvolvementingeneralpracticeaproposedstrategytoimprovethemanagementoflowbackpain
AT jensenmartinb conceptualframeworkforincreasingclinicalstaffmemberinvolvementingeneralpracticeaproposedstrategytoimprovethemanagementoflowbackpain
AT thomsenjanusl conceptualframeworkforincreasingclinicalstaffmemberinvolvementingeneralpracticeaproposedstrategytoimprovethemanagementoflowbackpain