Cargando…

‘What can I do that will most help researchers?’ A different approach to training the public at the start of their involvement in research

For patients and the public to work collaboratively with researchers, they need support and opportunities to engage in learning that builds on their skills and grows their confidence. In this article, we argue for a different approach to this learning, which starts with the expertise patients/ the p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Staley, Kristina, Cockcroft, Emma, Shelly, Andrea, Liabo, Kristin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6383232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30828464
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-019-0144-4
_version_ 1783396801973321728
author Staley, Kristina
Cockcroft, Emma
Shelly, Andrea
Liabo, Kristin
author_facet Staley, Kristina
Cockcroft, Emma
Shelly, Andrea
Liabo, Kristin
author_sort Staley, Kristina
collection PubMed
description For patients and the public to work collaboratively with researchers, they need support and opportunities to engage in learning that builds on their skills and grows their confidence. In this article, we argue for a different approach to this learning, which starts with the expertise patients/ the public arrive with, and helps them identify and develop the soft skills required to influence researchers effectively. Much of the current training for patients and the public focuses on addressing the gaps in their knowledge and awareness about how research works and how public involvement adds value. Our training complements this by exploring the concept of ‘experiential knowledge’ in more depth. Patients and the public possess experiential knowledge (knowledge gained through lived experience) that researchers may not have. In the training we explore the nature of this expertise and other skills that patients/ the public bring, as well as how to identify who has the most relevant experiential knowledge in any given situation, and how best to share experiential knowledge to benefit researchers and maximise the impact of involvement. We co-produced this training with a patient member of the project team, and through feedback from patients and carers in an initial pilot. Our approach adds another dimension to preparing people for involvement and in particular for taking part in conversations with researchers that support mutual learning. We suggest this approach should be supported by separate, mirror training for researchers, that also develops their soft skills in preparation for learning from involvement. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40900-019-0144-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6383232
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63832322019-03-01 ‘What can I do that will most help researchers?’ A different approach to training the public at the start of their involvement in research Staley, Kristina Cockcroft, Emma Shelly, Andrea Liabo, Kristin Res Involv Engagem Commentary For patients and the public to work collaboratively with researchers, they need support and opportunities to engage in learning that builds on their skills and grows their confidence. In this article, we argue for a different approach to this learning, which starts with the expertise patients/ the public arrive with, and helps them identify and develop the soft skills required to influence researchers effectively. Much of the current training for patients and the public focuses on addressing the gaps in their knowledge and awareness about how research works and how public involvement adds value. Our training complements this by exploring the concept of ‘experiential knowledge’ in more depth. Patients and the public possess experiential knowledge (knowledge gained through lived experience) that researchers may not have. In the training we explore the nature of this expertise and other skills that patients/ the public bring, as well as how to identify who has the most relevant experiential knowledge in any given situation, and how best to share experiential knowledge to benefit researchers and maximise the impact of involvement. We co-produced this training with a patient member of the project team, and through feedback from patients and carers in an initial pilot. Our approach adds another dimension to preparing people for involvement and in particular for taking part in conversations with researchers that support mutual learning. We suggest this approach should be supported by separate, mirror training for researchers, that also develops their soft skills in preparation for learning from involvement. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40900-019-0144-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6383232/ /pubmed/30828464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-019-0144-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Commentary
Staley, Kristina
Cockcroft, Emma
Shelly, Andrea
Liabo, Kristin
‘What can I do that will most help researchers?’ A different approach to training the public at the start of their involvement in research
title ‘What can I do that will most help researchers?’ A different approach to training the public at the start of their involvement in research
title_full ‘What can I do that will most help researchers?’ A different approach to training the public at the start of their involvement in research
title_fullStr ‘What can I do that will most help researchers?’ A different approach to training the public at the start of their involvement in research
title_full_unstemmed ‘What can I do that will most help researchers?’ A different approach to training the public at the start of their involvement in research
title_short ‘What can I do that will most help researchers?’ A different approach to training the public at the start of their involvement in research
title_sort ‘what can i do that will most help researchers?’ a different approach to training the public at the start of their involvement in research
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6383232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30828464
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-019-0144-4
work_keys_str_mv AT staleykristina whatcanidothatwillmosthelpresearchersadifferentapproachtotrainingthepublicatthestartoftheirinvolvementinresearch
AT cockcroftemma whatcanidothatwillmosthelpresearchersadifferentapproachtotrainingthepublicatthestartoftheirinvolvementinresearch
AT shellyandrea whatcanidothatwillmosthelpresearchersadifferentapproachtotrainingthepublicatthestartoftheirinvolvementinresearch
AT liabokristin whatcanidothatwillmosthelpresearchersadifferentapproachtotrainingthepublicatthestartoftheirinvolvementinresearch