Cargando…

Calcium electroporation for recurrent head and neck cancer: A clinical phase I study

BACKGROUND: Calcium electroporation is a novel cancer treatment, which combines temporary cell permeability from electroporation with a high influx of calcium intracellularly resulting in cancer cell necrosis. METHODS: A phase I trial performing calcium electroporation on 6 patients suffering from r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Plaschke, Christina Caroline, Gehl, Julie, Johannesen, Helle Hjorth, Fischer, Barbara Malene, Kjaer, Andreas, Lomholt, Anne Fog, Wessel, Irene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6383303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30828619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.233
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Calcium electroporation is a novel cancer treatment, which combines temporary cell permeability from electroporation with a high influx of calcium intracellularly resulting in cancer cell necrosis. METHODS: A phase I trial performing calcium electroporation on 6 patients suffering from recurrent head and neck cancer. In general anesthesia, intratumoral calcium injections were followed by electroporation. Safety was monitored by adverse events registration, serum Ca(2+), ECG, and pain scores. Tumor response was measured on PET/MRI scans. RESULTS: Procedures were performed without complications. No serious adverse events, signs of hypercalcemia, or cardiac arrhythmias were observed. Two months post‐treatment tumor responses on MRI: three partial responses, one stable disease, and two progression. Responses on PET: one partial metabolic disease, four with stable metabolic disease, and one not evaluable. One patient was without clinical evidence of disease after 12 months of observation. CONCLUSION: Calcium electroporation is feasible and safe in head and neck tumors. Clinical responses were observed in three of six patients, warranting further studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4