Cargando…

Three-dimensional dose comparison of flattening filter (FF) and flattening filter-free (FFF) radiation therapy by using NIPAM gel dosimetry

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy are modern radiation therapy technologies that can create the desired dose distribution by multileaf collimator movement and dose-rate control. However, the homogeneous dose delivery of small-field irradiation techniques shows dis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yao, Chun-Hsu, Chang, Tung-Hao, Lin, Chia-Chi, Lai, Yuan-Chun, Chen, Chin-Hsing, Chang, Yuan-Jen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6383886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30789968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212546
_version_ 1783396911469821952
author Yao, Chun-Hsu
Chang, Tung-Hao
Lin, Chia-Chi
Lai, Yuan-Chun
Chen, Chin-Hsing
Chang, Yuan-Jen
author_facet Yao, Chun-Hsu
Chang, Tung-Hao
Lin, Chia-Chi
Lai, Yuan-Chun
Chen, Chin-Hsing
Chang, Yuan-Jen
author_sort Yao, Chun-Hsu
collection PubMed
description Intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy are modern radiation therapy technologies that can create the desired dose distribution by multileaf collimator movement and dose-rate control. However, the homogeneous dose delivery of small-field irradiation techniques shows disagreement with that of treatment planning system. The removal of the flattening filter by flattening filter free (FFF) beam irradiation increases dose conformity and further reduces treatment delivery time in radiosurgery. This study aims to investigate the dose distribution of FFF and flattened beams for small-field irradiation by using the 3D gel dosimeter. The N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPAM) polymer gel dosimeter was employed to record the 3D dose distribution. In addition, flattened and FFF beams were compared using the gamma evaluation technique. The use of an FFF accelerator resulted in excellent radiation treatments with short delivery times and low doses to normal tissues and organs. Results also showed that the passing rate increased with the decrease of field size (30 × 30, 20 × 20, and 10 × 10 mm(2)) at post-irradiation times of 24, 48, 72, and 96 h. The passing rates for each field size were retained at the same level when gamma criteria, namely, distance-to-agreement (DTA) = 3 mm/dose difference (DD) = 3%, were used. Nevertheless, the passing rates for each field size decreased slowly after 48 h when DTA = 2 mm/DD = 2%. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to determine statistical difference with a significant level of p < 0.05. The passing rates of flattened and FFF beams showed no significant difference. The edge enhancement effect in the flattened beam was more evident than in the FFF beam. The 3D NIPAM gel dosimeter can be used for dose verification of small field for radiation therapy with high dose rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6383886
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63838862019-03-09 Three-dimensional dose comparison of flattening filter (FF) and flattening filter-free (FFF) radiation therapy by using NIPAM gel dosimetry Yao, Chun-Hsu Chang, Tung-Hao Lin, Chia-Chi Lai, Yuan-Chun Chen, Chin-Hsing Chang, Yuan-Jen PLoS One Research Article Intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy are modern radiation therapy technologies that can create the desired dose distribution by multileaf collimator movement and dose-rate control. However, the homogeneous dose delivery of small-field irradiation techniques shows disagreement with that of treatment planning system. The removal of the flattening filter by flattening filter free (FFF) beam irradiation increases dose conformity and further reduces treatment delivery time in radiosurgery. This study aims to investigate the dose distribution of FFF and flattened beams for small-field irradiation by using the 3D gel dosimeter. The N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPAM) polymer gel dosimeter was employed to record the 3D dose distribution. In addition, flattened and FFF beams were compared using the gamma evaluation technique. The use of an FFF accelerator resulted in excellent radiation treatments with short delivery times and low doses to normal tissues and organs. Results also showed that the passing rate increased with the decrease of field size (30 × 30, 20 × 20, and 10 × 10 mm(2)) at post-irradiation times of 24, 48, 72, and 96 h. The passing rates for each field size were retained at the same level when gamma criteria, namely, distance-to-agreement (DTA) = 3 mm/dose difference (DD) = 3%, were used. Nevertheless, the passing rates for each field size decreased slowly after 48 h when DTA = 2 mm/DD = 2%. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to determine statistical difference with a significant level of p < 0.05. The passing rates of flattened and FFF beams showed no significant difference. The edge enhancement effect in the flattened beam was more evident than in the FFF beam. The 3D NIPAM gel dosimeter can be used for dose verification of small field for radiation therapy with high dose rate. Public Library of Science 2019-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6383886/ /pubmed/30789968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212546 Text en © 2019 Yao et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yao, Chun-Hsu
Chang, Tung-Hao
Lin, Chia-Chi
Lai, Yuan-Chun
Chen, Chin-Hsing
Chang, Yuan-Jen
Three-dimensional dose comparison of flattening filter (FF) and flattening filter-free (FFF) radiation therapy by using NIPAM gel dosimetry
title Three-dimensional dose comparison of flattening filter (FF) and flattening filter-free (FFF) radiation therapy by using NIPAM gel dosimetry
title_full Three-dimensional dose comparison of flattening filter (FF) and flattening filter-free (FFF) radiation therapy by using NIPAM gel dosimetry
title_fullStr Three-dimensional dose comparison of flattening filter (FF) and flattening filter-free (FFF) radiation therapy by using NIPAM gel dosimetry
title_full_unstemmed Three-dimensional dose comparison of flattening filter (FF) and flattening filter-free (FFF) radiation therapy by using NIPAM gel dosimetry
title_short Three-dimensional dose comparison of flattening filter (FF) and flattening filter-free (FFF) radiation therapy by using NIPAM gel dosimetry
title_sort three-dimensional dose comparison of flattening filter (ff) and flattening filter-free (fff) radiation therapy by using nipam gel dosimetry
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6383886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30789968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212546
work_keys_str_mv AT yaochunhsu threedimensionaldosecomparisonofflatteningfilterffandflatteningfilterfreefffradiationtherapybyusingnipamgeldosimetry
AT changtunghao threedimensionaldosecomparisonofflatteningfilterffandflatteningfilterfreefffradiationtherapybyusingnipamgeldosimetry
AT linchiachi threedimensionaldosecomparisonofflatteningfilterffandflatteningfilterfreefffradiationtherapybyusingnipamgeldosimetry
AT laiyuanchun threedimensionaldosecomparisonofflatteningfilterffandflatteningfilterfreefffradiationtherapybyusingnipamgeldosimetry
AT chenchinhsing threedimensionaldosecomparisonofflatteningfilterffandflatteningfilterfreefffradiationtherapybyusingnipamgeldosimetry
AT changyuanjen threedimensionaldosecomparisonofflatteningfilterffandflatteningfilterfreefffradiationtherapybyusingnipamgeldosimetry