Cargando…

Do individual and work-related factors differentiate work participation trajectories before and after vocational rehabilitation?

BACKGROUND: Understanding diverse labor market trajectories around vocational rehabilitation provides important insight into potential effectiveness of rehabilitation efforts. We examined factors associated with work participation trajectories before and after vocational rehabilitation. METHODS: Usi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leinonen, Taina, Solovieva, Svetlana, Husgafvel-Pursiainen, Kirsti, Laaksonen, Mikko, Viikari-Juntura, Eira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6383888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30789938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212498
_version_ 1783396911939584000
author Leinonen, Taina
Solovieva, Svetlana
Husgafvel-Pursiainen, Kirsti
Laaksonen, Mikko
Viikari-Juntura, Eira
author_facet Leinonen, Taina
Solovieva, Svetlana
Husgafvel-Pursiainen, Kirsti
Laaksonen, Mikko
Viikari-Juntura, Eira
author_sort Leinonen, Taina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Understanding diverse labor market trajectories around vocational rehabilitation provides important insight into potential effectiveness of rehabilitation efforts. We examined factors associated with work participation trajectories before and after vocational rehabilitation. METHODS: Using nationwide Finnish register data of 7180 vocational rehabilitees, we constructed latent trajectory groups of work participation two years before and two years after their rehabilitation episode starting in 2008–2010. We plotted changes in labor market statuses in these groups and examined other associated factors using multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS: We identified four trajectories based on work participation levels before and after vocational rehabilitation. The “High–Resumed” group (35.6%) typically returned to full duties. The “High–to–Negligible” group (20.7%) typically transitioned to full disability retirement or unemployment. Among the “Medium–Resumed” (25.5%) and “Longstanding Negligible” (18.3%) groups, work disability and unemployment were common before rehabilitation, but afterwards those assigned to the former group often returned to full or partial duties. Overall, older age, male gender, living in areas with lower employment rates, having lower education, being employed in the private sector, and having mental diagnoses were associated with the other three trajectories than the most favorable “High-Resumed” trajectory. Furthermore, certain industrial sectors, job exposures, and less common diagnoses further separated specific trajectories. CONCLUSIONS: Work participation trajectories around vocational rehabilitation are diverse, only partly dependent on initial levels of work participation, and determined by various individual and work-related factors. Future nationwide studies should assess the effectiveness of vocational rehabilitation taking into consideration both individual and work-related factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6383888
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63838882019-03-09 Do individual and work-related factors differentiate work participation trajectories before and after vocational rehabilitation? Leinonen, Taina Solovieva, Svetlana Husgafvel-Pursiainen, Kirsti Laaksonen, Mikko Viikari-Juntura, Eira PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Understanding diverse labor market trajectories around vocational rehabilitation provides important insight into potential effectiveness of rehabilitation efforts. We examined factors associated with work participation trajectories before and after vocational rehabilitation. METHODS: Using nationwide Finnish register data of 7180 vocational rehabilitees, we constructed latent trajectory groups of work participation two years before and two years after their rehabilitation episode starting in 2008–2010. We plotted changes in labor market statuses in these groups and examined other associated factors using multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS: We identified four trajectories based on work participation levels before and after vocational rehabilitation. The “High–Resumed” group (35.6%) typically returned to full duties. The “High–to–Negligible” group (20.7%) typically transitioned to full disability retirement or unemployment. Among the “Medium–Resumed” (25.5%) and “Longstanding Negligible” (18.3%) groups, work disability and unemployment were common before rehabilitation, but afterwards those assigned to the former group often returned to full or partial duties. Overall, older age, male gender, living in areas with lower employment rates, having lower education, being employed in the private sector, and having mental diagnoses were associated with the other three trajectories than the most favorable “High-Resumed” trajectory. Furthermore, certain industrial sectors, job exposures, and less common diagnoses further separated specific trajectories. CONCLUSIONS: Work participation trajectories around vocational rehabilitation are diverse, only partly dependent on initial levels of work participation, and determined by various individual and work-related factors. Future nationwide studies should assess the effectiveness of vocational rehabilitation taking into consideration both individual and work-related factors. Public Library of Science 2019-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6383888/ /pubmed/30789938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212498 Text en © 2019 Leinonen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Leinonen, Taina
Solovieva, Svetlana
Husgafvel-Pursiainen, Kirsti
Laaksonen, Mikko
Viikari-Juntura, Eira
Do individual and work-related factors differentiate work participation trajectories before and after vocational rehabilitation?
title Do individual and work-related factors differentiate work participation trajectories before and after vocational rehabilitation?
title_full Do individual and work-related factors differentiate work participation trajectories before and after vocational rehabilitation?
title_fullStr Do individual and work-related factors differentiate work participation trajectories before and after vocational rehabilitation?
title_full_unstemmed Do individual and work-related factors differentiate work participation trajectories before and after vocational rehabilitation?
title_short Do individual and work-related factors differentiate work participation trajectories before and after vocational rehabilitation?
title_sort do individual and work-related factors differentiate work participation trajectories before and after vocational rehabilitation?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6383888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30789938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212498
work_keys_str_mv AT leinonentaina doindividualandworkrelatedfactorsdifferentiateworkparticipationtrajectoriesbeforeandaftervocationalrehabilitation
AT solovievasvetlana doindividualandworkrelatedfactorsdifferentiateworkparticipationtrajectoriesbeforeandaftervocationalrehabilitation
AT husgafvelpursiainenkirsti doindividualandworkrelatedfactorsdifferentiateworkparticipationtrajectoriesbeforeandaftervocationalrehabilitation
AT laaksonenmikko doindividualandworkrelatedfactorsdifferentiateworkparticipationtrajectoriesbeforeandaftervocationalrehabilitation
AT viikarijunturaeira doindividualandworkrelatedfactorsdifferentiateworkparticipationtrajectoriesbeforeandaftervocationalrehabilitation