Cargando…

Effect of different protective agents on enamel erosion: An in vitro investigation

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this in vitrostudy was to compare the effect of different protective agents on enamel erosion by measuring mean percentage weight loss. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Extracted teeth were sectioned into uniform slabs and enamel specimens were randomly distributed to different group...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Colombo, Marco, Dagna, Alberto, Moroni, Giulia, Chiesa, Marco, Poggio, Claudio, Pietrocola, Giampiero
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6383899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30805114
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.55278
_version_ 1783396914689998848
author Colombo, Marco
Dagna, Alberto
Moroni, Giulia
Chiesa, Marco
Poggio, Claudio
Pietrocola, Giampiero
author_facet Colombo, Marco
Dagna, Alberto
Moroni, Giulia
Chiesa, Marco
Poggio, Claudio
Pietrocola, Giampiero
author_sort Colombo, Marco
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this in vitrostudy was to compare the effect of different protective agents on enamel erosion by measuring mean percentage weight loss. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Extracted teeth were sectioned into uniform slabs and enamel specimens were randomly distributed to different groups. Initial weight of all enamel specimens was registered. The protective agents used in this study were Tooth Mousse, MI Paste Plus, Remin Pro and Remin Pro Forte. A control group was treated just with tap water. All the specimens were immersed in Coca-Cola for a total of 8 min at room temperature, dried and weighed. Enamel dissolution caused by acidic soft drink was analyzed: specimens were weighed after each immersion period and mean percent weight loss was calculated. Weight loss data were subjected to Analysis of Variance (One-way ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc tests. RESULTS: All the groups showed a statistically significant loss of weight (p<0.01) during the testing periods, increased after 8 days (~55%) and 12 days (~70%) of exposure. Specimens treated with protective agents showed significantly lower % of weight loss especially with Remin Pro or Remin Pro Forte. CONCLUSIONS: Soft drinks can cause enamel erosion, but protective agents tested may enhance enamel resistance against erosion. Key words:Enamel, erosion, protective agents, soft drinks, toothpastes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6383899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63838992019-02-25 Effect of different protective agents on enamel erosion: An in vitro investigation Colombo, Marco Dagna, Alberto Moroni, Giulia Chiesa, Marco Poggio, Claudio Pietrocola, Giampiero J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this in vitrostudy was to compare the effect of different protective agents on enamel erosion by measuring mean percentage weight loss. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Extracted teeth were sectioned into uniform slabs and enamel specimens were randomly distributed to different groups. Initial weight of all enamel specimens was registered. The protective agents used in this study were Tooth Mousse, MI Paste Plus, Remin Pro and Remin Pro Forte. A control group was treated just with tap water. All the specimens were immersed in Coca-Cola for a total of 8 min at room temperature, dried and weighed. Enamel dissolution caused by acidic soft drink was analyzed: specimens were weighed after each immersion period and mean percent weight loss was calculated. Weight loss data were subjected to Analysis of Variance (One-way ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc tests. RESULTS: All the groups showed a statistically significant loss of weight (p<0.01) during the testing periods, increased after 8 days (~55%) and 12 days (~70%) of exposure. Specimens treated with protective agents showed significantly lower % of weight loss especially with Remin Pro or Remin Pro Forte. CONCLUSIONS: Soft drinks can cause enamel erosion, but protective agents tested may enhance enamel resistance against erosion. Key words:Enamel, erosion, protective agents, soft drinks, toothpastes. Medicina Oral S.L. 2019-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6383899/ /pubmed/30805114 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.55278 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Colombo, Marco
Dagna, Alberto
Moroni, Giulia
Chiesa, Marco
Poggio, Claudio
Pietrocola, Giampiero
Effect of different protective agents on enamel erosion: An in vitro investigation
title Effect of different protective agents on enamel erosion: An in vitro investigation
title_full Effect of different protective agents on enamel erosion: An in vitro investigation
title_fullStr Effect of different protective agents on enamel erosion: An in vitro investigation
title_full_unstemmed Effect of different protective agents on enamel erosion: An in vitro investigation
title_short Effect of different protective agents on enamel erosion: An in vitro investigation
title_sort effect of different protective agents on enamel erosion: an in vitro investigation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6383899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30805114
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.55278
work_keys_str_mv AT colombomarco effectofdifferentprotectiveagentsonenamelerosionaninvitroinvestigation
AT dagnaalberto effectofdifferentprotectiveagentsonenamelerosionaninvitroinvestigation
AT moronigiulia effectofdifferentprotectiveagentsonenamelerosionaninvitroinvestigation
AT chiesamarco effectofdifferentprotectiveagentsonenamelerosionaninvitroinvestigation
AT poggioclaudio effectofdifferentprotectiveagentsonenamelerosionaninvitroinvestigation
AT pietrocolagiampiero effectofdifferentprotectiveagentsonenamelerosionaninvitroinvestigation