Cargando…

Different sensitivities of two optical magnetometers realized in the same experimental arrangement

In this article, operation of optical magnetometers detecting static (DC) and oscillating (AC) magnetic fields is studied and comparison of the devices is performed. To facilitate the comparison, the analysis is carried out in the same experimental setup, exploiting nonlinear magneto-optical rotatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Put, Piotr, Popiołek, Kacper, Pustelny, Szymon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6384897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30796329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39282-3
_version_ 1783397084264660992
author Put, Piotr
Popiołek, Kacper
Pustelny, Szymon
author_facet Put, Piotr
Popiołek, Kacper
Pustelny, Szymon
author_sort Put, Piotr
collection PubMed
description In this article, operation of optical magnetometers detecting static (DC) and oscillating (AC) magnetic fields is studied and comparison of the devices is performed. To facilitate the comparison, the analysis is carried out in the same experimental setup, exploiting nonlinear magneto-optical rotation. In such a system, a control over static-field magnitude or oscillating-field frequency provides detection of strength of the DC or AC fields. Polarization rotation is investigated for various light intensities and AC-field amplitudes, which allows to determine optimum sensitivity to both fields. With the results, we demonstrate that under optimal conditions the AC magnetometer is about ten times more sensitive than its DC counterpart, which originates from different response of the atoms to the fields. Bandwidth of the magnetometers is also analyzed, revealing its different dependence on the light power. Particularly, we demonstrate that bandwidth of the AC magnetometer can be significantly increased without strong deterioration of the magnetometer sensitivity. This behavior, combined with the ability to tune the resonance frequency of the AC magnetometer, provide means for ultra-sensitive measurements of the AC field in a broad but spectrally-limited range, where detrimental role of static-field instability is significantly reduced.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6384897
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63848972019-02-26 Different sensitivities of two optical magnetometers realized in the same experimental arrangement Put, Piotr Popiołek, Kacper Pustelny, Szymon Sci Rep Article In this article, operation of optical magnetometers detecting static (DC) and oscillating (AC) magnetic fields is studied and comparison of the devices is performed. To facilitate the comparison, the analysis is carried out in the same experimental setup, exploiting nonlinear magneto-optical rotation. In such a system, a control over static-field magnitude or oscillating-field frequency provides detection of strength of the DC or AC fields. Polarization rotation is investigated for various light intensities and AC-field amplitudes, which allows to determine optimum sensitivity to both fields. With the results, we demonstrate that under optimal conditions the AC magnetometer is about ten times more sensitive than its DC counterpart, which originates from different response of the atoms to the fields. Bandwidth of the magnetometers is also analyzed, revealing its different dependence on the light power. Particularly, we demonstrate that bandwidth of the AC magnetometer can be significantly increased without strong deterioration of the magnetometer sensitivity. This behavior, combined with the ability to tune the resonance frequency of the AC magnetometer, provide means for ultra-sensitive measurements of the AC field in a broad but spectrally-limited range, where detrimental role of static-field instability is significantly reduced. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6384897/ /pubmed/30796329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39282-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Put, Piotr
Popiołek, Kacper
Pustelny, Szymon
Different sensitivities of two optical magnetometers realized in the same experimental arrangement
title Different sensitivities of two optical magnetometers realized in the same experimental arrangement
title_full Different sensitivities of two optical magnetometers realized in the same experimental arrangement
title_fullStr Different sensitivities of two optical magnetometers realized in the same experimental arrangement
title_full_unstemmed Different sensitivities of two optical magnetometers realized in the same experimental arrangement
title_short Different sensitivities of two optical magnetometers realized in the same experimental arrangement
title_sort different sensitivities of two optical magnetometers realized in the same experimental arrangement
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6384897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30796329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39282-3
work_keys_str_mv AT putpiotr differentsensitivitiesoftwoopticalmagnetometersrealizedinthesameexperimentalarrangement
AT popiołekkacper differentsensitivitiesoftwoopticalmagnetometersrealizedinthesameexperimentalarrangement
AT pustelnyszymon differentsensitivitiesoftwoopticalmagnetometersrealizedinthesameexperimentalarrangement