Cargando…
Acute effects of different foam rolling volumes in the interset rest period on maximum repetition performance
BACKGROUND: Foam rolling (FR) is a ubiquitous intervention utilised for the purpose of acutely increasing the range of motion without subsequent decreases in performance. Thus, it is commonly used during the periworkout period—that is, prior to, during, or after an athlete's workout. OBJECTIVE:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6385092/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30931039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hkpj.2017.03.001 |
_version_ | 1783397125692850176 |
---|---|
author | Monteiro, Estêvão Rios Vigotsky, Andrew Škarabot, Jakob Brown, Amanda Fernandes Ferreira de Melo Fiuza, Aline Gomes Gomes, Thiago Matassoli Halperin, Israel da Silva Novaes, Jefferson |
author_facet | Monteiro, Estêvão Rios Vigotsky, Andrew Škarabot, Jakob Brown, Amanda Fernandes Ferreira de Melo Fiuza, Aline Gomes Gomes, Thiago Matassoli Halperin, Israel da Silva Novaes, Jefferson |
author_sort | Monteiro, Estêvão Rios |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Foam rolling (FR) is a ubiquitous intervention utilised for the purpose of acutely increasing the range of motion without subsequent decreases in performance. Thus, it is commonly used during the periworkout period—that is, prior to, during, or after an athlete's workout. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated how different FR durations applied to the quadriceps during the interset rest periods affects the numbers of repetitions in the knee extension exercise. METHODS: Twenty-five females completed four sets of knee extensions with 10 repetitions of maximum load to concentric failure on four occasions. Between each set, a 4-minute rest interval was implemented in which participants either passively rested or performed FR for different durations (60 seconds, 90 seconds, and 120 seconds). The 95% confidence intervals revealed a dose-dependent relationship in which longer durations of FR resulted in fewer completed repetitions. RESULTS: On average, the number of repetitions with PR was 13.8% greater than that in FR120, 8.6% greater than that in FR90, and 9.1% greater than that in FR60. CONCLUSION: For the purposes of performance and likely adaptation, interset FR seems to be detrimental to a person's ability to continually produce force, and should not be applied to the agonist muscle group between sets of knee extensions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6385092 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63850922019-03-29 Acute effects of different foam rolling volumes in the interset rest period on maximum repetition performance Monteiro, Estêvão Rios Vigotsky, Andrew Škarabot, Jakob Brown, Amanda Fernandes Ferreira de Melo Fiuza, Aline Gomes Gomes, Thiago Matassoli Halperin, Israel da Silva Novaes, Jefferson Hong Kong Physiother J Research Paper BACKGROUND: Foam rolling (FR) is a ubiquitous intervention utilised for the purpose of acutely increasing the range of motion without subsequent decreases in performance. Thus, it is commonly used during the periworkout period—that is, prior to, during, or after an athlete's workout. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated how different FR durations applied to the quadriceps during the interset rest periods affects the numbers of repetitions in the knee extension exercise. METHODS: Twenty-five females completed four sets of knee extensions with 10 repetitions of maximum load to concentric failure on four occasions. Between each set, a 4-minute rest interval was implemented in which participants either passively rested or performed FR for different durations (60 seconds, 90 seconds, and 120 seconds). The 95% confidence intervals revealed a dose-dependent relationship in which longer durations of FR resulted in fewer completed repetitions. RESULTS: On average, the number of repetitions with PR was 13.8% greater than that in FR120, 8.6% greater than that in FR90, and 9.1% greater than that in FR60. CONCLUSION: For the purposes of performance and likely adaptation, interset FR seems to be detrimental to a person's ability to continually produce force, and should not be applied to the agonist muscle group between sets of knee extensions. Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd 2017-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6385092/ /pubmed/30931039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hkpj.2017.03.001 Text en © 2017, Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Monteiro, Estêvão Rios Vigotsky, Andrew Škarabot, Jakob Brown, Amanda Fernandes Ferreira de Melo Fiuza, Aline Gomes Gomes, Thiago Matassoli Halperin, Israel da Silva Novaes, Jefferson Acute effects of different foam rolling volumes in the interset rest period on maximum repetition performance |
title | Acute effects of different foam rolling volumes in the interset rest period on maximum repetition performance |
title_full | Acute effects of different foam rolling volumes in the interset rest period on maximum repetition performance |
title_fullStr | Acute effects of different foam rolling volumes in the interset rest period on maximum repetition performance |
title_full_unstemmed | Acute effects of different foam rolling volumes in the interset rest period on maximum repetition performance |
title_short | Acute effects of different foam rolling volumes in the interset rest period on maximum repetition performance |
title_sort | acute effects of different foam rolling volumes in the interset rest period on maximum repetition performance |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6385092/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30931039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hkpj.2017.03.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT monteiroestevaorios acuteeffectsofdifferentfoamrollingvolumesintheintersetrestperiodonmaximumrepetitionperformance AT vigotskyandrew acuteeffectsofdifferentfoamrollingvolumesintheintersetrestperiodonmaximumrepetitionperformance AT skarabotjakob acuteeffectsofdifferentfoamrollingvolumesintheintersetrestperiodonmaximumrepetitionperformance AT brownamandafernandes acuteeffectsofdifferentfoamrollingvolumesintheintersetrestperiodonmaximumrepetitionperformance AT ferreirademelofiuzaalinegomes acuteeffectsofdifferentfoamrollingvolumesintheintersetrestperiodonmaximumrepetitionperformance AT gomesthiagomatassoli acuteeffectsofdifferentfoamrollingvolumesintheintersetrestperiodonmaximumrepetitionperformance AT halperinisrael acuteeffectsofdifferentfoamrollingvolumesintheintersetrestperiodonmaximumrepetitionperformance AT dasilvanovaesjefferson acuteeffectsofdifferentfoamrollingvolumesintheintersetrestperiodonmaximumrepetitionperformance |