Cargando…

Acute effects of different foam rolling volumes in the interset rest period on maximum repetition performance

BACKGROUND: Foam rolling (FR) is a ubiquitous intervention utilised for the purpose of acutely increasing the range of motion without subsequent decreases in performance. Thus, it is commonly used during the periworkout period—that is, prior to, during, or after an athlete's workout. OBJECTIVE:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Monteiro, Estêvão Rios, Vigotsky, Andrew, Škarabot, Jakob, Brown, Amanda Fernandes, Ferreira de Melo Fiuza, Aline Gomes, Gomes, Thiago Matassoli, Halperin, Israel, da Silva Novaes, Jefferson
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6385092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30931039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hkpj.2017.03.001
_version_ 1783397125692850176
author Monteiro, Estêvão Rios
Vigotsky, Andrew
Škarabot, Jakob
Brown, Amanda Fernandes
Ferreira de Melo Fiuza, Aline Gomes
Gomes, Thiago Matassoli
Halperin, Israel
da Silva Novaes, Jefferson
author_facet Monteiro, Estêvão Rios
Vigotsky, Andrew
Škarabot, Jakob
Brown, Amanda Fernandes
Ferreira de Melo Fiuza, Aline Gomes
Gomes, Thiago Matassoli
Halperin, Israel
da Silva Novaes, Jefferson
author_sort Monteiro, Estêvão Rios
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Foam rolling (FR) is a ubiquitous intervention utilised for the purpose of acutely increasing the range of motion without subsequent decreases in performance. Thus, it is commonly used during the periworkout period—that is, prior to, during, or after an athlete's workout. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated how different FR durations applied to the quadriceps during the interset rest periods affects the numbers of repetitions in the knee extension exercise. METHODS: Twenty-five females completed four sets of knee extensions with 10 repetitions of maximum load to concentric failure on four occasions. Between each set, a 4-minute rest interval was implemented in which participants either passively rested or performed FR for different durations (60 seconds, 90 seconds, and 120 seconds). The 95% confidence intervals revealed a dose-dependent relationship in which longer durations of FR resulted in fewer completed repetitions. RESULTS: On average, the number of repetitions with PR was 13.8% greater than that in FR120, 8.6% greater than that in FR90, and 9.1% greater than that in FR60. CONCLUSION: For the purposes of performance and likely adaptation, interset FR seems to be detrimental to a person's ability to continually produce force, and should not be applied to the agonist muscle group between sets of knee extensions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6385092
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63850922019-03-29 Acute effects of different foam rolling volumes in the interset rest period on maximum repetition performance Monteiro, Estêvão Rios Vigotsky, Andrew Škarabot, Jakob Brown, Amanda Fernandes Ferreira de Melo Fiuza, Aline Gomes Gomes, Thiago Matassoli Halperin, Israel da Silva Novaes, Jefferson Hong Kong Physiother J Research Paper BACKGROUND: Foam rolling (FR) is a ubiquitous intervention utilised for the purpose of acutely increasing the range of motion without subsequent decreases in performance. Thus, it is commonly used during the periworkout period—that is, prior to, during, or after an athlete's workout. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated how different FR durations applied to the quadriceps during the interset rest periods affects the numbers of repetitions in the knee extension exercise. METHODS: Twenty-five females completed four sets of knee extensions with 10 repetitions of maximum load to concentric failure on four occasions. Between each set, a 4-minute rest interval was implemented in which participants either passively rested or performed FR for different durations (60 seconds, 90 seconds, and 120 seconds). The 95% confidence intervals revealed a dose-dependent relationship in which longer durations of FR resulted in fewer completed repetitions. RESULTS: On average, the number of repetitions with PR was 13.8% greater than that in FR120, 8.6% greater than that in FR90, and 9.1% greater than that in FR60. CONCLUSION: For the purposes of performance and likely adaptation, interset FR seems to be detrimental to a person's ability to continually produce force, and should not be applied to the agonist muscle group between sets of knee extensions. Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd 2017-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6385092/ /pubmed/30931039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hkpj.2017.03.001 Text en © 2017, Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Paper
Monteiro, Estêvão Rios
Vigotsky, Andrew
Škarabot, Jakob
Brown, Amanda Fernandes
Ferreira de Melo Fiuza, Aline Gomes
Gomes, Thiago Matassoli
Halperin, Israel
da Silva Novaes, Jefferson
Acute effects of different foam rolling volumes in the interset rest period on maximum repetition performance
title Acute effects of different foam rolling volumes in the interset rest period on maximum repetition performance
title_full Acute effects of different foam rolling volumes in the interset rest period on maximum repetition performance
title_fullStr Acute effects of different foam rolling volumes in the interset rest period on maximum repetition performance
title_full_unstemmed Acute effects of different foam rolling volumes in the interset rest period on maximum repetition performance
title_short Acute effects of different foam rolling volumes in the interset rest period on maximum repetition performance
title_sort acute effects of different foam rolling volumes in the interset rest period on maximum repetition performance
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6385092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30931039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hkpj.2017.03.001
work_keys_str_mv AT monteiroestevaorios acuteeffectsofdifferentfoamrollingvolumesintheintersetrestperiodonmaximumrepetitionperformance
AT vigotskyandrew acuteeffectsofdifferentfoamrollingvolumesintheintersetrestperiodonmaximumrepetitionperformance
AT skarabotjakob acuteeffectsofdifferentfoamrollingvolumesintheintersetrestperiodonmaximumrepetitionperformance
AT brownamandafernandes acuteeffectsofdifferentfoamrollingvolumesintheintersetrestperiodonmaximumrepetitionperformance
AT ferreirademelofiuzaalinegomes acuteeffectsofdifferentfoamrollingvolumesintheintersetrestperiodonmaximumrepetitionperformance
AT gomesthiagomatassoli acuteeffectsofdifferentfoamrollingvolumesintheintersetrestperiodonmaximumrepetitionperformance
AT halperinisrael acuteeffectsofdifferentfoamrollingvolumesintheintersetrestperiodonmaximumrepetitionperformance
AT dasilvanovaesjefferson acuteeffectsofdifferentfoamrollingvolumesintheintersetrestperiodonmaximumrepetitionperformance