Cargando…
Effects of dominance and prestige based social status on competition for attentional resources
Social status can be attained through either dominance (coercion and intimidation) or prestige (skill and respect). Individuals high in either of these status pathways are known to more readily attract gaze and covert spatial attention compared to their low-status counterparts. However it is not kno...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6385251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30792492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39223-0 |
_version_ | 1783397160972189696 |
---|---|
author | Roberts, Ashton Palermo, Romina Visser, Troy A. W. |
author_facet | Roberts, Ashton Palermo, Romina Visser, Troy A. W. |
author_sort | Roberts, Ashton |
collection | PubMed |
description | Social status can be attained through either dominance (coercion and intimidation) or prestige (skill and respect). Individuals high in either of these status pathways are known to more readily attract gaze and covert spatial attention compared to their low-status counterparts. However it is not known if social status biases allocation of attentional resources to competing stimuli. To address this issue, we used an attentional blink paradigm to explore non-spatial attentional biases in response to face stimuli varying in dominance and prestige. Results from a series of studies consistently indicated that participants were biased towards allocating attention to low- relative to high- dominance faces. We also observed no effects of manipulating prestige on attentional bias. We attribute our results to the workings of comparatively early processing stages, separate from those mediating spatial attention shifts, which are tuned to physical features associated with low dominance. These findings challenge our current understanding of the impact of social status on attentional competition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6385251 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63852512019-02-26 Effects of dominance and prestige based social status on competition for attentional resources Roberts, Ashton Palermo, Romina Visser, Troy A. W. Sci Rep Article Social status can be attained through either dominance (coercion and intimidation) or prestige (skill and respect). Individuals high in either of these status pathways are known to more readily attract gaze and covert spatial attention compared to their low-status counterparts. However it is not known if social status biases allocation of attentional resources to competing stimuli. To address this issue, we used an attentional blink paradigm to explore non-spatial attentional biases in response to face stimuli varying in dominance and prestige. Results from a series of studies consistently indicated that participants were biased towards allocating attention to low- relative to high- dominance faces. We also observed no effects of manipulating prestige on attentional bias. We attribute our results to the workings of comparatively early processing stages, separate from those mediating spatial attention shifts, which are tuned to physical features associated with low dominance. These findings challenge our current understanding of the impact of social status on attentional competition. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6385251/ /pubmed/30792492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39223-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Roberts, Ashton Palermo, Romina Visser, Troy A. W. Effects of dominance and prestige based social status on competition for attentional resources |
title | Effects of dominance and prestige based social status on competition for attentional resources |
title_full | Effects of dominance and prestige based social status on competition for attentional resources |
title_fullStr | Effects of dominance and prestige based social status on competition for attentional resources |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of dominance and prestige based social status on competition for attentional resources |
title_short | Effects of dominance and prestige based social status on competition for attentional resources |
title_sort | effects of dominance and prestige based social status on competition for attentional resources |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6385251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30792492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39223-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT robertsashton effectsofdominanceandprestigebasedsocialstatusoncompetitionforattentionalresources AT palermoromina effectsofdominanceandprestigebasedsocialstatusoncompetitionforattentionalresources AT vissertroyaw effectsofdominanceandprestigebasedsocialstatusoncompetitionforattentionalresources |