Cargando…
The Nellix endovascular aneurysm sealing system: current perspectives
BACKGROUND: The Nellix endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) system is a novel approach for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of EVAS in the management of patients with AAA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, and bibliographic...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6385777/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30858738 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S155300 |
_version_ | 1783397270838837248 |
---|---|
author | Choo, Xin Y Hajibandeh, Shahab Hajibandeh, Shahin Antoniou, George A |
author_facet | Choo, Xin Y Hajibandeh, Shahab Hajibandeh, Shahin Antoniou, George A |
author_sort | Choo, Xin Y |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Nellix endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) system is a novel approach for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of EVAS in the management of patients with AAA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, and bibliographic reference lists to identify studies reporting clinical outcomes in patients with asymptomatic, non-ruptured AAA treated with EVAS with the Nellix device. We pooled dichotomous outcome data using random-effects models. RESULTS: We identified 14 single-arm observational studies, reporting a total of 1,510 patients. The pooled estimate of technical success was 99% (95% CI =98–100; heterogeneity: P=0.869, I(2)=0%). Adjunctive procedures were carried out in 39% (95% CI =19–63; heterogeneity: P<0.0001, I(2)=88%). Two cases of aneurysm rupture were reported within 30 days of treatment (0.7%, 95% CI =0.3–1.6; heterogeneity: P=0.923, I(2)=0%) and another five cases of rupture occurred during follow-up (0.8%, 95% CI =0.4–1.6; heterogeneity: P=0.958, I(2)=0%). The pooled estimates of early (within 30 days) and late (during follow-up) type I endoleak were 2.8 % (95% CI =1.8–4.2; heterogeneity: P=0.254, I(2)=18%) and 1.9% (95% CI =1.3–2.8; heterogeneity: P=0.887, I(2)=0%), respectively. Sac enlargement was noted in 3.1% (95% CI =1.8–5.4; heterogeneity: P=0.419, I(2)=0%) and device migration in 2.1% (95% CI =0.8–5.3; heterogeneity: P=0.004, I(2)=65%). The early and late reintervention rates were 2.7% (95% CI =1.7–4.2; heterogeneity: P=0.183, I(2)=27%) and 3.5% (95% CI =2.3–5.5; heterogeneity: P=0.061, I(2)=42%), respectively. The pooled estimate of 30-day mortality was 1.5% (95% CI =0.9–2.6; heterogeneity: P=0.559, I(2)=0%) and the pooled estimate of aneurysm-related death during follow-up was 1.0% (95% CI =0.6–1.9; heterogeneity: P=0.872, I(2)=0%). CONCLUSION: Reported outcomes of EVAS are acceptable. Type I endoleak, sac enlargement, device migration, and aneurysm rupture are recognized complications. High-level research is required to investigate potential advantages of EVAS over conventional treatments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6385777 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63857772019-03-11 The Nellix endovascular aneurysm sealing system: current perspectives Choo, Xin Y Hajibandeh, Shahab Hajibandeh, Shahin Antoniou, George A Med Devices (Auckl) Review BACKGROUND: The Nellix endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) system is a novel approach for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of EVAS in the management of patients with AAA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, and bibliographic reference lists to identify studies reporting clinical outcomes in patients with asymptomatic, non-ruptured AAA treated with EVAS with the Nellix device. We pooled dichotomous outcome data using random-effects models. RESULTS: We identified 14 single-arm observational studies, reporting a total of 1,510 patients. The pooled estimate of technical success was 99% (95% CI =98–100; heterogeneity: P=0.869, I(2)=0%). Adjunctive procedures were carried out in 39% (95% CI =19–63; heterogeneity: P<0.0001, I(2)=88%). Two cases of aneurysm rupture were reported within 30 days of treatment (0.7%, 95% CI =0.3–1.6; heterogeneity: P=0.923, I(2)=0%) and another five cases of rupture occurred during follow-up (0.8%, 95% CI =0.4–1.6; heterogeneity: P=0.958, I(2)=0%). The pooled estimates of early (within 30 days) and late (during follow-up) type I endoleak were 2.8 % (95% CI =1.8–4.2; heterogeneity: P=0.254, I(2)=18%) and 1.9% (95% CI =1.3–2.8; heterogeneity: P=0.887, I(2)=0%), respectively. Sac enlargement was noted in 3.1% (95% CI =1.8–5.4; heterogeneity: P=0.419, I(2)=0%) and device migration in 2.1% (95% CI =0.8–5.3; heterogeneity: P=0.004, I(2)=65%). The early and late reintervention rates were 2.7% (95% CI =1.7–4.2; heterogeneity: P=0.183, I(2)=27%) and 3.5% (95% CI =2.3–5.5; heterogeneity: P=0.061, I(2)=42%), respectively. The pooled estimate of 30-day mortality was 1.5% (95% CI =0.9–2.6; heterogeneity: P=0.559, I(2)=0%) and the pooled estimate of aneurysm-related death during follow-up was 1.0% (95% CI =0.6–1.9; heterogeneity: P=0.872, I(2)=0%). CONCLUSION: Reported outcomes of EVAS are acceptable. Type I endoleak, sac enlargement, device migration, and aneurysm rupture are recognized complications. High-level research is required to investigate potential advantages of EVAS over conventional treatments. Dove Medical Press 2019-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6385777/ /pubmed/30858738 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S155300 Text en © 2019 Choo et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Review Choo, Xin Y Hajibandeh, Shahab Hajibandeh, Shahin Antoniou, George A The Nellix endovascular aneurysm sealing system: current perspectives |
title | The Nellix endovascular aneurysm sealing system: current perspectives |
title_full | The Nellix endovascular aneurysm sealing system: current perspectives |
title_fullStr | The Nellix endovascular aneurysm sealing system: current perspectives |
title_full_unstemmed | The Nellix endovascular aneurysm sealing system: current perspectives |
title_short | The Nellix endovascular aneurysm sealing system: current perspectives |
title_sort | nellix endovascular aneurysm sealing system: current perspectives |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6385777/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30858738 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S155300 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chooxiny thenellixendovascularaneurysmsealingsystemcurrentperspectives AT hajibandehshahab thenellixendovascularaneurysmsealingsystemcurrentperspectives AT hajibandehshahin thenellixendovascularaneurysmsealingsystemcurrentperspectives AT antoniougeorgea thenellixendovascularaneurysmsealingsystemcurrentperspectives AT chooxiny nellixendovascularaneurysmsealingsystemcurrentperspectives AT hajibandehshahab nellixendovascularaneurysmsealingsystemcurrentperspectives AT hajibandehshahin nellixendovascularaneurysmsealingsystemcurrentperspectives AT antoniougeorgea nellixendovascularaneurysmsealingsystemcurrentperspectives |