Cargando…

New endoscopic ultrasonography criteria for malignant lymphadenopathy based on inter-rater agreement

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Various studies have been previously conducted on the diagnosis of lymphadenopathy as benign or malignant, but the results vary. These studies did not describe the inter-rater agreement on the EUS features of lymphadenopathy. In this study, we evaluate the inter-rater agreement...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takasaki, Yusuke, Irisawa, Atsushi, Shibukawa, Goro, Sato, Ai, Abe, Yoko, Yamabe, Akane, Arakawa, Noriyuki, Maki, Takumi, Yoshida, Yoshitsugu, Igarashi, Ryo, Yamamoto, Shogo, Ikeda, Tsunehiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6386303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30794598
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212427
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Various studies have been previously conducted on the diagnosis of lymphadenopathy as benign or malignant, but the results vary. These studies did not describe the inter-rater agreement on the EUS features of lymphadenopathy. In this study, we evaluate the inter-rater agreement on EUS features and propose EUS diagnostic norms for lymphadenopathy based on inter-rater agreement. METHOD: A total of 68 lymph nodes subjected to EUS-fine needle aspiration (FNA) were reviewed by five endoscopic experts. The EUS features evaluated lymph node size, shape, border, margin, echogenicity, homogeneity, and the hilum of the lymph node. Inter-rater agreement (multi-rater kappa statics) was performed. We established new criteria using results with a high degree of inter-rater agreement from EUS features and compared them with the former criteria. RESULT: There was a moderate agreement on shape, kappa (K) = 0.44 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.34–0.54), and fair agreement on echogenicity, homogeneity, border, and hilum of the lymph node, K (95% CI) = 0.33 (0.17–0.38), 0.34 (0.26–0.35), 0.22 (0.21–0.31), and 0.22 (0.11–0.26), respectively. This resulted in the establishment of new EUS diagnostic criteria using shape, long axis > 20 mm and short axis > 10 mm. New criteria were superior to old criteria (area under the curve 0.82 vs 0.52, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: EUS diagnostic criteria for lymphadenopathy based on inter-rater agreement were more accurate than old criteria. This result will be useful for the diagnosis of lymphadenopathy.