Cargando…

Comparison of linear model and artificial neural network using antler beam diameter and length of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) dataset

Evaluation of harvest data remains one of the most important sources of information in the development of strategies to manage regional populations of white-tailed deer. While descriptive statistics and simple linear models are utilized extensively, the use of artificial neural networks for this typ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peters, Sunday O., Sinecen, Mahmut, Gallagher, George R., Pebworth, Lauren A., Jacob, Suleima, Hatfield, Jason S., Kizilkaya, Kadir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6386314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30794631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212545
_version_ 1783397359036661760
author Peters, Sunday O.
Sinecen, Mahmut
Gallagher, George R.
Pebworth, Lauren A.
Jacob, Suleima
Hatfield, Jason S.
Kizilkaya, Kadir
author_facet Peters, Sunday O.
Sinecen, Mahmut
Gallagher, George R.
Pebworth, Lauren A.
Jacob, Suleima
Hatfield, Jason S.
Kizilkaya, Kadir
author_sort Peters, Sunday O.
collection PubMed
description Evaluation of harvest data remains one of the most important sources of information in the development of strategies to manage regional populations of white-tailed deer. While descriptive statistics and simple linear models are utilized extensively, the use of artificial neural networks for this type of data analyses is unexplored. Linear model was compared to Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) models with Levenberg–Marquardt (L-M), Bayesian Regularization (BR) and Scaled Conjugate Gradient (SCG) learning algorithms, to evaluate the relative accuracy in predicting antler beam diameter and length using age and dressed body weight in white-tailed deer. Data utilized for this study were obtained from male animals harvested by hunters between 1977–2009 at the Berry College Wildlife Management Area. Metrics for evaluating model performance indicated that linear and ANN models resulted in close match and good agreement between predicted and observed values and thus good performance for all models. However, metrics values of Mean Absolute Error and Root Mean Squared Error for linear model and the ANN-BR model indicated smaller error and lower deviation relative to the mean values of antler beam diameter and length in comparison to other ANN models, demonstrating better agreement of the predicted and observed values of antler beam diameter and length. ANN-SCG model resulted in the highest error within the models. Overall, metrics for evaluating model performance from the ANN model with BR learning algorithm and linear model indicated better agreement of the predicted and observed values of antler beam diameter and length. Results of this study suggest the use of ANN generated results that are comparable to Linear Models of harvest data to aid in the development of strategies to manage white-tailed deer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6386314
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63863142019-03-09 Comparison of linear model and artificial neural network using antler beam diameter and length of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) dataset Peters, Sunday O. Sinecen, Mahmut Gallagher, George R. Pebworth, Lauren A. Jacob, Suleima Hatfield, Jason S. Kizilkaya, Kadir PLoS One Research Article Evaluation of harvest data remains one of the most important sources of information in the development of strategies to manage regional populations of white-tailed deer. While descriptive statistics and simple linear models are utilized extensively, the use of artificial neural networks for this type of data analyses is unexplored. Linear model was compared to Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) models with Levenberg–Marquardt (L-M), Bayesian Regularization (BR) and Scaled Conjugate Gradient (SCG) learning algorithms, to evaluate the relative accuracy in predicting antler beam diameter and length using age and dressed body weight in white-tailed deer. Data utilized for this study were obtained from male animals harvested by hunters between 1977–2009 at the Berry College Wildlife Management Area. Metrics for evaluating model performance indicated that linear and ANN models resulted in close match and good agreement between predicted and observed values and thus good performance for all models. However, metrics values of Mean Absolute Error and Root Mean Squared Error for linear model and the ANN-BR model indicated smaller error and lower deviation relative to the mean values of antler beam diameter and length in comparison to other ANN models, demonstrating better agreement of the predicted and observed values of antler beam diameter and length. ANN-SCG model resulted in the highest error within the models. Overall, metrics for evaluating model performance from the ANN model with BR learning algorithm and linear model indicated better agreement of the predicted and observed values of antler beam diameter and length. Results of this study suggest the use of ANN generated results that are comparable to Linear Models of harvest data to aid in the development of strategies to manage white-tailed deer. Public Library of Science 2019-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6386314/ /pubmed/30794631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212545 Text en © 2019 Peters et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Peters, Sunday O.
Sinecen, Mahmut
Gallagher, George R.
Pebworth, Lauren A.
Jacob, Suleima
Hatfield, Jason S.
Kizilkaya, Kadir
Comparison of linear model and artificial neural network using antler beam diameter and length of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) dataset
title Comparison of linear model and artificial neural network using antler beam diameter and length of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) dataset
title_full Comparison of linear model and artificial neural network using antler beam diameter and length of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) dataset
title_fullStr Comparison of linear model and artificial neural network using antler beam diameter and length of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) dataset
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of linear model and artificial neural network using antler beam diameter and length of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) dataset
title_short Comparison of linear model and artificial neural network using antler beam diameter and length of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) dataset
title_sort comparison of linear model and artificial neural network using antler beam diameter and length of white-tailed deer (odocoileus virginianus) dataset
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6386314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30794631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212545
work_keys_str_mv AT peterssundayo comparisonoflinearmodelandartificialneuralnetworkusingantlerbeamdiameterandlengthofwhitetaileddeerodocoileusvirginianusdataset
AT sinecenmahmut comparisonoflinearmodelandartificialneuralnetworkusingantlerbeamdiameterandlengthofwhitetaileddeerodocoileusvirginianusdataset
AT gallaghergeorger comparisonoflinearmodelandartificialneuralnetworkusingantlerbeamdiameterandlengthofwhitetaileddeerodocoileusvirginianusdataset
AT pebworthlaurena comparisonoflinearmodelandartificialneuralnetworkusingantlerbeamdiameterandlengthofwhitetaileddeerodocoileusvirginianusdataset
AT jacobsuleima comparisonoflinearmodelandartificialneuralnetworkusingantlerbeamdiameterandlengthofwhitetaileddeerodocoileusvirginianusdataset
AT hatfieldjasons comparisonoflinearmodelandartificialneuralnetworkusingantlerbeamdiameterandlengthofwhitetaileddeerodocoileusvirginianusdataset
AT kizilkayakadir comparisonoflinearmodelandartificialneuralnetworkusingantlerbeamdiameterandlengthofwhitetaileddeerodocoileusvirginianusdataset