Cargando…

Earlier relapse detection after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation by chimerism assays: Digital PCR versus quantitative real-time PCR of insertion/deletion polymorphisms

BACKGROUND: The analysis of molecular haematopoietic chimerisms (HC) has become a well-established method to monitor the transplant evolution and to assess the risk of relapse after allogeneic stem cells transplantation (allo-STC). Different techniques and molecular markers are being used for chimer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Valero-Garcia, Jennifer, González-Espinosa, María del Carmen, Barrios, Manuel, Carmona-Antoñanzas, Greta, García-Planells, Javier, Ruiz-Lafora, Carlos, Fuentes-Gálvez, Ainhoa, Jiménez-Velasco, Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6386495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30794643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212708
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The analysis of molecular haematopoietic chimerisms (HC) has become a well-established method to monitor the transplant evolution and to assess the risk of relapse after allogeneic stem cells transplantation (allo-STC). Different techniques and molecular markers are being used for chimerism surveillance after transplantation, including quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) and the recently developed digital PCR (dPCR). This study aims to compare the sensitivity and accuracy of both methods to quantify HC and predict early relapse. METHODOLOGY: HC was evaluated using custom PCR systems for the specific detection of the Y-chromosome, null alleles and insertion-deletion polymorphisms. A total of 281 samples from 28 adult patients who underwent an allo-SCT were studied. Increasing mixed chimerism was detected prior to relapse in 100% of patients (18 relapses). RESULTS: Compared with conventional qPCR amplification, dPCR predicted relapse with a median anticipation period of 63 days versus 45.5 days by qPCR. Overall, 56% of the relapses were predicted earlier with dPCR whereas 38% of the relapses where detected simultaneously using both techniques and only in 1 case, relapse was predicted earlier with qPCR. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, chimerism determination by dPCR constitutes a suitable technique for the follow-up of patients with haematological pathologies after allo-STC, showing greater sensitivity to predict an early relapse.