Cargando…
Interpreting contemporary trends in atmospheric methane
Atmospheric methane plays a major role in controlling climate, yet contemporary methane trends (1982–2017) have defied explanation with numerous, often conflicting, hypotheses proposed in the literature. Specifically, atmospheric observations of methane from 1982 to 2017 have exhibited periods of bo...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Academy of Sciences
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6386658/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30733299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1814297116 |
_version_ | 1783397409126088704 |
---|---|
author | Turner, Alexander J. Frankenberg, Christian Kort, Eric A. |
author_facet | Turner, Alexander J. Frankenberg, Christian Kort, Eric A. |
author_sort | Turner, Alexander J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Atmospheric methane plays a major role in controlling climate, yet contemporary methane trends (1982–2017) have defied explanation with numerous, often conflicting, hypotheses proposed in the literature. Specifically, atmospheric observations of methane from 1982 to 2017 have exhibited periods of both increasing concentrations (from 1982 to 2000 and from 2007 to 2017) and stabilization (from 2000 to 2007). Explanations for the increases and stabilization have invoked changes in tropical wetlands, livestock, fossil fuels, biomass burning, and the methane sink. Contradictions in these hypotheses arise because our current observational network cannot unambiguously link recent methane variations to specific sources. This raises some fundamental questions: (i) What do we know about sources, sinks, and underlying processes driving observed trends in atmospheric methane? (ii) How will global methane respond to changes in anthropogenic emissions? And (iii), What future observations could help resolve changes in the methane budget? To address these questions, we discuss potential drivers of atmospheric methane abundances over the last four decades in light of various observational constraints as well as process-based knowledge. While uncertainties in the methane budget exist, they should not detract from the potential of methane emissions mitigation strategies. We show that net-zero cost emission reductions can lead to a declining atmospheric burden, but can take three decades to stabilize. Moving forward, we make recommendations for observations to better constrain contemporary trends in atmospheric methane and to provide mitigation support. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6386658 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | National Academy of Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63866582019-02-26 Interpreting contemporary trends in atmospheric methane Turner, Alexander J. Frankenberg, Christian Kort, Eric A. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Perspective Atmospheric methane plays a major role in controlling climate, yet contemporary methane trends (1982–2017) have defied explanation with numerous, often conflicting, hypotheses proposed in the literature. Specifically, atmospheric observations of methane from 1982 to 2017 have exhibited periods of both increasing concentrations (from 1982 to 2000 and from 2007 to 2017) and stabilization (from 2000 to 2007). Explanations for the increases and stabilization have invoked changes in tropical wetlands, livestock, fossil fuels, biomass burning, and the methane sink. Contradictions in these hypotheses arise because our current observational network cannot unambiguously link recent methane variations to specific sources. This raises some fundamental questions: (i) What do we know about sources, sinks, and underlying processes driving observed trends in atmospheric methane? (ii) How will global methane respond to changes in anthropogenic emissions? And (iii), What future observations could help resolve changes in the methane budget? To address these questions, we discuss potential drivers of atmospheric methane abundances over the last four decades in light of various observational constraints as well as process-based knowledge. While uncertainties in the methane budget exist, they should not detract from the potential of methane emissions mitigation strategies. We show that net-zero cost emission reductions can lead to a declining atmospheric burden, but can take three decades to stabilize. Moving forward, we make recommendations for observations to better constrain contemporary trends in atmospheric methane and to provide mitigation support. National Academy of Sciences 2019-02-19 2019-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6386658/ /pubmed/30733299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1814297116 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Perspective Turner, Alexander J. Frankenberg, Christian Kort, Eric A. Interpreting contemporary trends in atmospheric methane |
title | Interpreting contemporary trends in atmospheric methane |
title_full | Interpreting contemporary trends in atmospheric methane |
title_fullStr | Interpreting contemporary trends in atmospheric methane |
title_full_unstemmed | Interpreting contemporary trends in atmospheric methane |
title_short | Interpreting contemporary trends in atmospheric methane |
title_sort | interpreting contemporary trends in atmospheric methane |
topic | Perspective |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6386658/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30733299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1814297116 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT turneralexanderj interpretingcontemporarytrendsinatmosphericmethane AT frankenbergchristian interpretingcontemporarytrendsinatmosphericmethane AT korterica interpretingcontemporarytrendsinatmosphericmethane |