Cargando…

Interpreting contemporary trends in atmospheric methane

Atmospheric methane plays a major role in controlling climate, yet contemporary methane trends (1982–2017) have defied explanation with numerous, often conflicting, hypotheses proposed in the literature. Specifically, atmospheric observations of methane from 1982 to 2017 have exhibited periods of bo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Turner, Alexander J., Frankenberg, Christian, Kort, Eric A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Academy of Sciences 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6386658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30733299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1814297116
_version_ 1783397409126088704
author Turner, Alexander J.
Frankenberg, Christian
Kort, Eric A.
author_facet Turner, Alexander J.
Frankenberg, Christian
Kort, Eric A.
author_sort Turner, Alexander J.
collection PubMed
description Atmospheric methane plays a major role in controlling climate, yet contemporary methane trends (1982–2017) have defied explanation with numerous, often conflicting, hypotheses proposed in the literature. Specifically, atmospheric observations of methane from 1982 to 2017 have exhibited periods of both increasing concentrations (from 1982 to 2000 and from 2007 to 2017) and stabilization (from 2000 to 2007). Explanations for the increases and stabilization have invoked changes in tropical wetlands, livestock, fossil fuels, biomass burning, and the methane sink. Contradictions in these hypotheses arise because our current observational network cannot unambiguously link recent methane variations to specific sources. This raises some fundamental questions: (i) What do we know about sources, sinks, and underlying processes driving observed trends in atmospheric methane? (ii) How will global methane respond to changes in anthropogenic emissions? And (iii), What future observations could help resolve changes in the methane budget? To address these questions, we discuss potential drivers of atmospheric methane abundances over the last four decades in light of various observational constraints as well as process-based knowledge. While uncertainties in the methane budget exist, they should not detract from the potential of methane emissions mitigation strategies. We show that net-zero cost emission reductions can lead to a declining atmospheric burden, but can take three decades to stabilize. Moving forward, we make recommendations for observations to better constrain contemporary trends in atmospheric methane and to provide mitigation support.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6386658
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher National Academy of Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63866582019-02-26 Interpreting contemporary trends in atmospheric methane Turner, Alexander J. Frankenberg, Christian Kort, Eric A. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Perspective Atmospheric methane plays a major role in controlling climate, yet contemporary methane trends (1982–2017) have defied explanation with numerous, often conflicting, hypotheses proposed in the literature. Specifically, atmospheric observations of methane from 1982 to 2017 have exhibited periods of both increasing concentrations (from 1982 to 2000 and from 2007 to 2017) and stabilization (from 2000 to 2007). Explanations for the increases and stabilization have invoked changes in tropical wetlands, livestock, fossil fuels, biomass burning, and the methane sink. Contradictions in these hypotheses arise because our current observational network cannot unambiguously link recent methane variations to specific sources. This raises some fundamental questions: (i) What do we know about sources, sinks, and underlying processes driving observed trends in atmospheric methane? (ii) How will global methane respond to changes in anthropogenic emissions? And (iii), What future observations could help resolve changes in the methane budget? To address these questions, we discuss potential drivers of atmospheric methane abundances over the last four decades in light of various observational constraints as well as process-based knowledge. While uncertainties in the methane budget exist, they should not detract from the potential of methane emissions mitigation strategies. We show that net-zero cost emission reductions can lead to a declining atmospheric burden, but can take three decades to stabilize. Moving forward, we make recommendations for observations to better constrain contemporary trends in atmospheric methane and to provide mitigation support. National Academy of Sciences 2019-02-19 2019-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6386658/ /pubmed/30733299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1814297116 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Perspective
Turner, Alexander J.
Frankenberg, Christian
Kort, Eric A.
Interpreting contemporary trends in atmospheric methane
title Interpreting contemporary trends in atmospheric methane
title_full Interpreting contemporary trends in atmospheric methane
title_fullStr Interpreting contemporary trends in atmospheric methane
title_full_unstemmed Interpreting contemporary trends in atmospheric methane
title_short Interpreting contemporary trends in atmospheric methane
title_sort interpreting contemporary trends in atmospheric methane
topic Perspective
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6386658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30733299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1814297116
work_keys_str_mv AT turneralexanderj interpretingcontemporarytrendsinatmosphericmethane
AT frankenbergchristian interpretingcontemporarytrendsinatmosphericmethane
AT korterica interpretingcontemporarytrendsinatmosphericmethane